NihilusZero
Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008 From: Nashville, TN Status: offline
|
Obviously much of the issue would rest in the demeanor and intent behind this topping-from-the-bottom...but it's not something I'd find attractive under most of the presumptions you've outlined. This is essentially an offshoot thread to a recent one started by DemonKia about how well "testing" is received (which strikes me as interesting as more people seem comfortable with the same premise made here, just being described in a different way). And while I argued, there, that such testing, when put into play at the beginning of the interaction phase between two people, can help uncover compatibilities, I made specific mention that such testing becomes an attempt at covert manipulation once the relationship has started. Once a sub/slave is in a relationship with me, I would not tolerate for them to create scenarios so they can determine stuff with subterfuge...things that, if they really needed to know, they should have ascertained before entering into a formal relationship with me. A sub doing these things because she is whimsically playful and has no ulterior motive is one thing. A sub initiating these things becasuse they think they are charged with the task to temper/test/mold/maneuver my wishes and thoughts, on the other hand, would quickly get the boot from me. Sure, we all learn things from the people closest to us in our lives...but I don't need those very people to be in my life (certainly not what should be an obedient sub/slave) presuming they are meant to take up the secret role of educating me on me through randomly fabricated scenarios meant to elicit my Dom reactions.
_____________________________
"I know it's all a game I know they're all insane I know it's all in vain I know that I'm to blame." ~Siouxsie & the Banshees NihilusZero.com CM Sex God du Jour CM Hall Monitor
|