LordDarkPleasure -> RE: Percentage of submissive females in general population? (8/20/2009 4:40:05 PM)
|
This is a copy pase from a post I made a long while ago, I didn't bother editing so if some stuff sounds out of context, blame it on my lazyness. Read this: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~siona/personals.html Simply put, the Men/Women ratio on the internet is 25:1. Now here is another link on BDSM: http://www.sexsupport.org/bdsmforyoungadults.html In short: Research shows some significant differences in opinion and behavior between men and women when it comes to erotic power exchange. We singled out the respondents between 18 and 24 years of age for you, because the answers of the respondents in this age range point to some very interesting conclusions. Not a real phenomenum - in fact pretty well known in sexology - is the fact that young women are not so sure about their general sexual orientation as young men are. For example, almost the entire group of male respondents (96%) indicates their sexual orientation is heterosexual, whereas 71% of the female group indicates heterosexual and 29% is either curious about bisexuality or not sure about their orientation at all. When it comes to role pattern however, the young men seem to be much less clear about their orientation. Only half of the male group indicates a positive dominant role (52%), 14% indicates to be submissive and 34% indicates to switch roles. The vast majority (71%) of the female respondents indicates they are submissive, 19% switches roles and 10% has a dominant orientation. Also, young women appear to be much more active when it comes to erotic power exchange. A strong majority of 62% indicates they have had at least one active erotic power exchange experience, whereas only 32% of the male respondents say they have had such an active experience. So basically, on top of the 25:1 ratio, more of those women are looking for other women. Also, the ratios show that if you are a male sub, you're quite screwed! Now I got lucky since the issue that caused me to be invisible on this website (being too young) resolved itself over time. But honestly, if I knew back then that nobody was seeing me because women could afford tightening their search criterias, I probably would have given myself a few years just so that my damn profile would be seen. I'd probably not be interested in those directly looking up my profile, but at least I would've had a chance at making a contact network. Now imagine someone who's just a bit too small, height or penis wise, to have women bother initiating conversation or even seeing their profile...
|
|
|
|