RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


barelynangel -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 2:57:59 PM)

Wolf2Bear, you have a good idea there but if people are predisposed to being overweight based on genes and such -- how come the obesity concept has become an issue in only this generation and last? Some could say research abilities but i don't believe it. How come other countries haven't had such an issue before this day and age. I don't disagree some of it may be genetic but evolution takes a LONG time to create the concept of genes. So what did those before us who had this gene defy the gene?

I agree there is such a thing but its not overcomeable as past history has shown, the majority of people in the world have only recently become overweight and obese.

So there must be a way to defy the gene, what changed? Convenience of our society, choices of ease instead of working harder, etc. I am not saying this is BAD lazy, i am saying though compared to past history, our society has become a majorily lazy society one that demands convenience and ease and quick.

Also i DO agree that there are few people who have issues that even choices won't help, but not 60% of Americans hell i woudn't even say 10%.

angel




DrkJourney -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 2:59:13 PM)

since I guess I'm not allow to ask a question...guess you have to be a jerk to do that




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:01:12 PM)

quote:

ol, you aren't ths non-shallow person as steel identifies it as --- you are simply less selective in who you choose to take time to get ti know.
quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

Umm zephyr is it now? first of all STEEL ASKED me for my PERSONAL views so i gave them. If you have an issue with that speak to him. Secondly, your attempt to make this about me is pathetic --- go back and read what i have said. STEEL decided to ask for personal ideas. Secondly, you are lying if you sit here all sanctimoniusly and believe you don't judge people. based on looks, maybe you are more accepting in what physically attracts you but that doesn't make people who aren't shallow. HELL, one of my biggest issues with MEN is MY OWN EXPECTATIONS OF MYSELF wherein if they find me attractive when i am out of shape and overweight, i don't respect them for it. So this isn't a concept of i have altering expectations of myself that i do of others.

lol, you aren't ths non-shallow person as steel identifies it as --- you are simply less selective in who you choose to take time to get ti know. Whereas some people are MORE selective. But in the end, everyone is selective based upon appearance. So sorry to knock you off your look at me i am such a good person pedastal you put yourself on in order to try and make me look bad, but in the end EVERYONE is selective.

Some people are less or more than others. WHICH all this does is maximize or minimize the playing field accordingly you have to work with. You have a larger playing field due to you choose to take time for relationship seeking even if someone turns you off appearance wise, i have a smaller one due to i don't take time for relationship seeking and am perfectly content with that.

Its always so interesting when people want to make people BAD people lol in discussions like these.


Excuse me have we met? Have we ever even spoken? How could you POSSIBLY know why I make the choices I do? In fact how can you claim to know anything at all about my choices in life other than what I state here? Are you a mind reader? Do we have someone in common in our lives? All I was doing was calling you on your "I'm not shallow" comment. No I'm not less selective, I just prefer to get to know someone rather than judge them by what they look like. No I don't judge them on looks, not one of the men I've gone out with vanilla and not was good looking, there has always been something else about them that attracted me to them.

I made it about you only in as much as I was commenting on your statement.





Musicmystery -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:01:29 PM)

quote:

And for the record I am speaking to the responders and not "him"....lol


Thanks Mom.




Justme696 -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:01:46 PM)

People can look at big people in 2 ways I think...and you can't judge them for it..because it is a matter of attraction, taste, opinion.
As friend...looking beyond the weight...or as lover...then looks might be attractive.
( same counts for very thin people also, black or white....tall or short..etc)




DrkJourney -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:02:53 PM)

I wasn't being mom, I didn't say not to post, I  just said I didn't understand, which merely opens the door for an explaination...no need to sink to his level





Musicmystery -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:04:47 PM)

Uh-huh. Got it. Thanks.




Wolf2Bear -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:06:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: porcelaine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear

Granted there is a segment of the population that are obese because they failed to learn proper eating habits and portion control in the amount of food they consume. The fact is some are predisposed to being overweight, some have weigh issues related to medication for certain medical conditions, some people are addicted to food.


if i didn't know better i'd assume you expect the person to overlook what may be physically appealing to him in deference to the other factors cited. it will never occur unless his desire for her exceeds the importance that he places upon the preference/factor or whatever we're calling it now.

although now my curiosity is piqued. what other deal breakers would be considered shallow in the selection process?

porcelaine



Sorry though I don't believe that is what I was saying. Over issues such as weigh, smoking, alcohol and such, I do not expect a person to ignore what they believe is physically appealing; I just hope their basis of what they find appealing and what they don't are based upon sincere and honest opinions and not based upon a false sense of what is thought of being okay and what isn't.

What I personally find are deal breakers are aspects to a person's personality which are not reasonably compatible with my own. I also want to state that I have never in this thread made use of the term 'shallow' whatsoever.




SteelofUtah -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:08:10 PM)

Sorry the definition of Shallow that I use is from Websters and it is the same as it is defined in Funk and Wagnall so at very least it is the same definition that at least 90% of the english speaking world use.

See said definition on page 8.

It should be understood that Shallow is not a NEGATIVE word it is JUST a word one that many preceive to be Negative. I see it as a choice but it tells me a lot about the person who makes those choices.

Steel




barelynangel -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:09:50 PM)

shakes my head Steel, all you are doing is giving YOUR opinion of how people should choose a mate. and what you are saying is YOUR OPINION is what makes it shallow or not for EVERYONE. Sorry, its not. Your own arrogance in believing you should set the standard of what everyone should consider in finding a mate or Dom or sub. Sorry but all you have are YOUR opinions. Just because i don't find you attractive for a Dom for ME because yes MY NEEDS, and yeah being 40 years old almost, i kinda know what those are and what does and doesn't turn me off in a Man especially one who wants to be my Master.

If you HONESTLY cannot see how a person's appearance could effect a WHOLE PERCEPTION OF A PERSON wherein NEEDS ARE NOT being met, and want to hold on to its shallow, then you are too tunnelvisioned to remotely see beyond your own DETERMINATIONS FOR WHY YOU CHOOSE PEOPLE FOR A RELATIONSHIP. And are trying to say no one else can have their own or they are WRONG, because of how it effects you personally.

You asked for needs i told you -- now you are trying to tell me that what i stated AREN'T NEEDS. What the hell Steel, who are YOU to determine what NEEDS of people are or should be based on your own prejudice?

angel




Musicmystery -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:09:52 PM)

Circles, Steel.




SteelofUtah -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:11:18 PM)

My Stance on IMAGE is that if you only base it on the physical then you miss out on the person.

People become BEAUTIFUL to me from the INSIDE OUT.

Pretty is an Outward Image that has little to do with attraction to me. Pretty comes and goes, I have yet to meet a Pretty person who is Sick with the flu. The outside appearance just isn't there. When I date I look to the inside before I decide how I feel about the outside. It is suprising how BEAUTIFUL someone who isn't PRETTY can become when you get to know them as a PERSON.

Steel




Musicmystery -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:13:14 PM)

Are you under the impression anyone disagrees with that?

The point is the day-to-day practicality of ideal situations with people you're just now encountering.




sirsholly -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:14:23 PM)

quote:

It is suprising how BEAUTIFUL someone who isn't PRETTY can become when you get to know them as a PERSON.
given the chance. In a perfect world appearance would not matter. But this is not a perfect world.




porcelaine -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:14:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wolf2Bear

Sorry though I don't believe that is what I was saying. Over issues such as weigh, smoking, alcohol and such, I do not expect a person to ignore what they believe is physically appealing; I just hope their basis of what they find appealing and what they don't are based upon sincere and honest opinions and not based upon a false sense of what is thought of being okay and what isn't.

What I personally find are deal breakers are aspects to a person's personality which are not reasonably compatible with my own. I also want to state that I have never in this thread made use of the term 'shallow' whatsoever.


but the very things you have mentioned as sincere and honest are subjective and can't quantified. we each afford different definitions to those concepts. deal breakers are individual and no two lists will ever be the same. what one person willingly accepts another wouldn't dream of tolerating. for some the inner person is paramount, others begin with the outer portion, some weigh them both. i don't think either approach is wrong.

porcelaine




kittinSol -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:17:13 PM)

Fat threads rock, and there hasn't been a good one in yonks [:(] . Cheers, blacklion [&:].




SteelofUtah -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:17:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

shakes my head Steel, all you are doing is giving YOUR opinion of how people should choose a mate. and what you are saying is YOUR OPINION is what makes it shallow or not for EVERYONE. Sorry, its not. Your own arrogance in believing you should set the standard of what everyone should consider in finding a mate or Dom or sub. Sorry but all you have are YOUR opinions. Just because i don't find you attractive for a Dom for ME because yes MY NEEDS, and yeah being 40 years old almost, i kinda know what those are and what does and doesn't turn me off in a Man especially one who wants to be my Master.

If you HONESTLY cannot see how a person's appearance could effect a WHOLE PERCEPTION OF A PERSON wherein NEEDS ARE NOT being met, and want to hold on to its shallow, then you are too tunnelvisioned to remotely see beyond your own DETERMINATIONS FOR WHY YOU CHOOSE PEOPLE FOR A RELATIONSHIP. And are trying to say no one else can have their own or they are WRONG, because of how it effects you personally.

You asked for needs i told you -- now you are trying to tell me that what i stated AREN'T NEEDS. What the hell Steel, who are YOU to determine what NEEDS of people are or should be based on your own prejudice?

angel


Not My Opinion. A Definiotion. Websters and Funk & Wagnals to be exact.

As for My stance on how you see the world. I'll be honest. I could give a shit if you thought I was attractive or not. Your Personality would stop any interest I had in you LONG before I gave a fuck what you looked like.

You are Shallow not because I say so but because you meet the definition of the word that carries your actions. If that makes me Arrogant. I will say that I would rather be arrogant than shallow. I would rather hold myself to a Higher Moral Standard than basing my partners on Body Image.

I am not asking you to do anything. I have a wonderful life and have no problem finding partners. I am just pointing out the OP's shallowness in beliving that someones weight could have anything to do with their ability to meet their needs unless those needs were also shallow and superficial.

Not Opinion. Logical Process.

Steel





Musicmystery -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:19:57 PM)

I don't think "arrogant" is the word you're looking for. Naive, perhaps.




barelynangel -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeightHowDoYouExpectaDomToBelieveYouCanMeetHisNeedsWhenYouNeglectYourOwnHealth? (10/17/2009 3:21:15 PM)

Laugh zephyr you need to go back and read your own post and then you may get mine. You addressed me, i can't help it you don't like the answer. Your post speaks that you somehow are all good and perfect and never judge, i simply am calling you on the BS.

So are you saying you DO judge like i do and others do and have to find someone physically attractive in order to pursue a relationship (NOT FRIENDSHIP) with them -- as i have indicated i do -- or you aren't selective at all and a person's appearance has no bearing in seeking a potential relationship with them?

I don't know what meetihg or talking has to do with this -- i responded to your post where you said

quote:

Here's a thought angel. SOME of us look past the exterior and get to know the person before judging, it isn't being PC we just prefer to judge someone by who and what they are rather than just on what they look like. Steel is right, that you don't means that you are indeed shallow. That you don't like relationships with fat people is fine, honestly I don't care what your preferences are, just don't say you aren't shallow when you judge based on what you see.


I presume i am the angel you are referring to -- if not, the sorry you didn't clarify. Second, i have bolded some pertinent words for you which allows me to draw the conclusions about you i have . Perhaps you were lying or misstating your position for yourself, but when someone says us and we -- it tends to allow the conclusion to be drawn that you are speaking of yourself also.


So you never have looked at a person and said, damn i would LOVE to get to know him, or have some stranger give you the once over who isn't physically attractive to you and make advances and you blew him off? Being selective doesn't just go one way.


angel





Wolf2Bear -> RE: IfYouAreOverWeight (10/17/2009 3:21:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: barelynangel

Wolf2Bear, you have a good idea there but if people are predisposed to being overweight based on genes and such -- how come the obesity concept has become an issue in only this generation and last? Some could say research abilities but i don't believe it. How come other countries haven't had such an issue before this day and age. I don't disagree some of it may be genetic but evolution takes a LONG time to create the concept of genes. So what did those before us who had this gene defy the gene?

I agree there is such a thing but its not overcomeable as past history has shown, the majority of people in the world have only recently become overweight and obese.

So there must be a way to defy the gene, what changed? Convenience of our society, choices of ease instead of working harder, etc. I am not saying this is BAD lazy, i am saying though compared to past history, our society has become a majorly lazy society one that demands convenience and ease and quick.

Also i DO agree that there are few people who have issues that even choices won't help, but not 60% of Americans hell i wouldn't even say 10%.

angel


To answer your first question...I do not have a satisfactory answer and would be grasping at straws attempting to answer it.

Looking at the stats for Canada, 23.1% of Canadians aged 18 or older, an estimated 5.5 million adults, had a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more, indicating that they were obese. So yes....modern society has become a society that is lazy in this sense.




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125