Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Climategate


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Climategate Page: <<   < prev  23 24 25 [26] 27   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 10:19:23 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

Manipulation, exaggeration and no evidence of any significant warming in the 20th century.

Written by Joseph D'Aleo & Anthony Watts
Saturday, 23 January 2010


Authors veteran meteorologists Joe D’Aleo and Anthony Watts analyzed temperature records from all around the world for a major SPPI paper, Surface Temperature Records – Policy-driven Deception? The startling conclusion that we cannot tell whether there was any significant “global warming” at all in the 20th century is based on numerous astonishing examples of manipulation and exaggeration of the true level and rate of “global warming”.

That is to say, leading meteorological institutions in the USA and around the world have so systematically tampered with instrumental temperature data that it cannot be safely said that there has been any significant net “global warming” in the 20th century.


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 501
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 10:52:44 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, talk radio fuckheads, thats about as close as you will ever come. Trouble is, if you ever did come up with anything aproaching reality, nobody would ever believe it after all the fucktarded shit you have done here.

So you sat in a meeting, I've sat in meetings. It doesn't take alot of brain to sit down.


So to have diesel engine particulate filters and by 2023 get SOME diesel engines up to 2010 EPA code is going to lose 1 million jobs, when?

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 502
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 10:56:31 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
We have more registered vehicles on the road than registered drivers. Literally. And more competition abroad.

Manufacturers are going to suffer in this industry, no matter what. Market saturation.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 503
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 11:42:19 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah, talk radio fuckheads, thats about as close as you will ever come. Trouble is, if you ever did come up with anything aproaching reality, nobody would ever believe it after all the fucktarded shit you have done here.

So you sat in a meeting, I've sat in meetings. It doesn't take alot of brain to sit down.


So to have diesel engine particulate filters and by 2023 get SOME diesel engines up to 2010 EPA code is going to lose 1 million jobs, when?


Its an interview with a Senator. Open your brain and let some fresh air in that rotting shell.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 504
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 11:55:29 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
which senator? I thought you were the source of losing 1 million jobs quote, so its a fucking senator, and we are aware of their track record.

how about you come up with something with some basis in fact once in awhile, laffer curve and making money in Reits and financial analyst without one?

Again though, talk radio, how about you get some at least surfacely plausible facts rather than op-ed political bullshit, grow a mind in there.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 505
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 11:59:27 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
The implementation of the new standards will actually create roughly 1.15 millions jobs.


Jeff

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 506
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:27:31 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

which senator? I thought you were the source of losing 1 million jobs quote, so its a fucking senator, and we are aware of their track record.

how about you come up with something with some basis in fact once in awhile, laffer curve and making money in Reits and financial analyst without one?

Again though, talk radio, how about you get some at least surfacely plausible facts rather than op-ed political bullshit, grow a mind in there.



A Ca State Senator knows a helluva lot more than a moron from Mn.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 507
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:28:39 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Oh, thats right, big government wilbur. more of your socialst policies.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 508
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:35:08 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
I am still waiting for Wilbur to explain this one....

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Since 65% of FNC viewers are either liberal or independent, the "what they want to hear" line is bullshit.


No problem spreading the manure...Just hate to have the shit thrown back into your face.

Still waiting.....




_____________________________



(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 509
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:37:56 PM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Oh, thats right, big government wilbur. more of your socialst policies.


You mean more of the Dems socialist policies, of course.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 510
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:40:52 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
What about this?

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Since 65% of FNC viewers are either liberal or independent, the "what they want to hear" line is bullshit.


You apparently have no ability to be honest and will say anything if you think that it furthers your position.

Well, were waiting....

< Message edited by domiguy -- 1/29/2010 12:41:09 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to willbeurdaddy)
Profile   Post #: 511
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:42:50 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
angry trolls demand an answer.....

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 512
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:43:36 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Don't forget.. servant says NPR gets 48% of it's funding from the government!

46% must come from a secret slush fund.

NPR is a CIA Black Op.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 513
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 12:53:00 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
Luckydawg...You have no problem being loose with the facts as well.  You could care less about the quality of the posts you make, honesty and the truth be damned.

Why you fuckers have such a time being honest with your posts is beyond me.  It's fine to have opinions and occasionally one might say something that is not 100% accurate.

Why is it so fucking hard to admit that you were mistaken? 


_____________________________



(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 514
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 3:33:49 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

I am still waiting for Wilbur to explain this one....

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy

Since 65% of FNC viewers are either liberal or independent, the "what they want to hear" line is bullshit.


No problem spreading the manure...Just hate to have the shit thrown back into your face.

Still waiting.....





I've heard Bob Beckel, as a guest on Hannity, say something very similar, but I cannot remember the exact percentages. He was developing the idea that by appearing on FNC on one night that he was speaking to more independent voters than by spending a week on PMSNBC.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 515
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 5:38:02 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
Ok ill play with the domitroll for a bit.

Mistaken about what?

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 516
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 5:53:40 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
And domitroll does have a point. the 65% number is not correct. The correct number is 55%. Most fox viewers self identify as Independant or Democrat. Only 39% as Republicans.


Willbes point, that most Fox viewers are Democrat or Independant is 100% correct. And the premise that Fox just preaches to the Choir as an arm of the Republican party is false. And shown to be false by the numbers. Even though he got the exact % wrong.

Domitroll is so excited to have finally found a small point to be correct about, he is spamming the boards, like the nasty little troll he is. While not beign smart enough to see the willbes point was essentially correct.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 517
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 6:14:27 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Among regular Fox News Channel viewers, 39% identified as Republican, 33% as Democrats and 22% as independents. Among regular CNN viewers, 51% identified as Democrats, 23% were independents and just 18% were Republicans. In short, Democrats comprise a larger share of the Fox News audience than Republicans do of CNN's audience.
However, it should be noted that there are more Democrats than independents or Republicans in the general public. In the 2008 news consumption survey on which this analysis is based, 36% identified as Democrats, 29% as independents and 25% as Republicans.
 
 
Here are the numbers from Pew.  Luckydawg, in a forum where the tiniest details are nit picked to death 9 percentage points is way off.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 518
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 6:26:07 PM   
luckydawg


Posts: 2448
Joined: 9/2/2009
Status: offline
well some folks nit pick at tiny details......yet as I stated his point was correct


and you ruined it. I didn't link tot he real numbers because I wanted domitroll to insult me and call me a liar, before I posted em.

Like I did with RML and the Kerry filming issues.

_____________________________

I was posting as Right Wing Hippie, but that account got messed up.

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 519
RE: Climategate - 1/29/2010 6:32:29 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
Yeah, those swift boaters sure are something.

You also totally ignored Ron's link about their respective records.

You won't ever get it, but you are sad.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to luckydawg)
Profile   Post #: 520
Page:   <<   < prev  23 24 25 [26] 27   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Climategate Page: <<   < prev  23 24 25 [26] 27   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.133