RE: dangerous men (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


NihilusZero -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:45:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

The part where you said you hated women so naturally you wanted one to abuse is the first that comes to mind.

Just to be overly critical: was this confession coupled with a suggestion that he wanted the act(s) to be non-consensual?




Elisabella -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:46:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

So you stir the pot and then complain about the mix?
Its simple, you get what you give.

Well, not entirely. I haven't followed up on the osf saga, but there's a notable difference between finding someone's posts vapid and demeaning the posts and finding someone's posts vapid and demeaning them.

If he's been subjected to the latter, then it would be a concern.



That would only be the case if his posts weren't about himself. If his posts are all about himself, his beliefs, his desires, he's giving enough autobiographical information to be criticized for his beliefs rather than just his posts.




Lockit -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:47:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

not knowing me you dont understand my sense of humor so ill let that stand as #1 i did say that, but then it wasnt directed at anyone in particular if you can discount the whole female sex

also this is supposed to be an adult forum for those with less than socially acceptable sexual proclivities as such id say my statements are rather mild compared to what one is likely to find on collar me

and ive read many female profiles that stress a preference for being unloved and abused


Your humor has fallen flat and the only one getting a kick out of it was you. You have said horrific things about women and to women and if you call that humor, I call that sick humor.

If your comments are more mild than what is said in a place like this... then why are so many responding as they do?




osf -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:49:19 PM)

the statement was made in the open so if any woman responded favorably it would be with consent

as i said in an edit ive read may female profiles with a preference for that kind of treatment
the trap we're falling in is not believing that not every body on here wants what we want




tsatske -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:49:41 PM)

Isn't there supposed to be a block button over on this side that blocks me from seeing someone's posts? I can't find it.
(BTW - This is SO ontopic here. trust me)

ETA- found it! Yea!




Elisabella -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:49:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NihilusZero

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

The part where you said you hated women so naturally you wanted one to abuse is the first that comes to mind.

Just to be overly critical: was this confession coupled with a suggestion that he wanted the act(s) to be non-consensual?



It didn't specify, but I was actually focusing more on the 'I hate women' part as trying to start shit...maybe his "any woman who doesn't want to be a slave is a pervert" would be a better example.

Both are blanket negative statements toward all women (ETA: in the 2nd one toward all women who don't want to be slaves), and by encompassing all women they are also negative statements to any individual woman.




Elisabella -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:50:48 PM)





quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

Isn't there supposed to be a block button over on this side that blocks me from seeing someone's posts? I can't find it.
(BTW - This is SO ontopic here. trust me)


Bottom left hand corner right under the person's avatar/info is a button called "Hide."




osf -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:51:00 PM)

and this site is a paradigm of mental health lolololol




tsatske -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:52:24 PM)

Thanks Elisabella, Your a Queen :)




osf -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:53:12 PM)

the pervert statement was in response to an attack on me by some one

i did not initiate the attack

that one doesnt count




Elisabella -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:53:16 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske

Thanks Elisabella, Your a Queen :)


No worries love, I'll probably be doing the same once this thread is though...I have a problem with ignoring someone who I'm currently discussing but once I'm done...I'll be done.




zephyroftheNorth -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:53:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: zephyroftheNorth

mmmmmyeah and the one about wanting to jump a woman in an alley and attack her *waves to Bella*



Oooh I missed that one.

See how useful community efforts can be?

*waves back*
:D



Cooperation is a wonderful thing. Bet if we put our heads together we could think of a few more. *snerk*




Elisabella -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:54:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

the pervert statement was in response to an attack on me by some one

i did not initiate the attack

that one doesnt count


No, that pervert statement was a response to ME, telling you that since I have no desire to be a slave you saying "what part of shut the fuck up didn't you understand" was inappropriate.





hopelessfool -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:55:05 PM)

now that ive wasted several good minutes of my life...

Why would anyone find you offensive osf... I mean fucking really. What was that no personal attacks I see one there... and there... and there...

quote:

osf
quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

no wonder lockit, your not a real woman '
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

drifa try reading it again this time without the tin foil hat


quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

you have yet to say anything pertinent to anything ive said


quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

im curious, do you realize that your behavior here is a reflection on your sir?


quote:

ORIGINAL: osf
#1 show up

#2 shut the fuck up

#3 do as your told





NihilusZero -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:55:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

That would only be the case if his posts weren't about himself. If his posts are all about himself, his beliefs, his desires, he's giving enough autobiographical information to be criticized for his beliefs rather than just his posts.

I've just made a cursory look-over as far as threads he's started. Only one of them was phrased specifically about him. The others didn't strike me as "about him" any more than any thread where a person is obviously floating a thought out there because of having had a personal experience with it (I'm pretty sure most of the threads here are started anecdotally).

And, unless he's been talking about anything that specifically involves a non-consenting party, I don't see where any substance can be mounted to support an attack on beliefs.




lusciouslips19 -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:56:42 PM)

1 show up

#2 shut the fuck up

#3 do as your told

can any of you walk and chew gum at the same time?

sometimes question the sanity of any woman that would seek out a man to knock her about or the sanity of a man that enjoys it

any woman that doesnt want to be a slave is a pervert

I like to approach them in dark alleys. '"


You didnt make a statement to one person specifically. You insulted all of the woman equally.




WyldHrt -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:58:23 PM)

quote:

So you stir the pot and then complain about the mix?
Its simple, you get what you give.

Quoted for truth.
It always amuses me to watch forum newbies. Some take the time to get a feel for the board, read a bit before posting, and word serious posts so that they are clear and understandable. Those folks just seem to slip right in like they've always been here, regardless of the fact that many of us disagree with some, or even most, of what they say.

Others come on "bull in a china shop" style, posting nearly nonsensical crap all over the place, wording it in a way any adult should know is offensive, then whining about being 'attacked' when the responses they get are anything but positive.

I always wonder what the reaction would be should the latter try the same thing at a munch, party, or event.




osf -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 8:58:36 PM)

the first 4 were in response to attacks on me

the last so what, this is an adult site where we come to find partners with that we can relate to, if you dont fit the bill keep quiet

its as though "my kink is ok but your kink is perverted"




hopelessfool -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 9:01:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

the first 4 were in response to attacks on me

the last so what, this is an adult site where we come to find partners with that we can relate to, if you dont fit the bill keep quiet

its as though "my kink is ok but your kink is perverted"


You said YOU  personally made NO personal attacks...

You have now been proven a liar and i feel like i will be able to sleep at night. not that you affected that before I have a killer guard cat. and 26 inches of snow protecting me.




NihilusZero -> RE: dangerous men (12/19/2009 9:01:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hopelessfool

now that ive wasted several good minutes of my life...

Why would anyone find you offensive osf... I mean fucking really. What was that no personal attacks I see one there... and there... and there...

I only see 1 in all that quoting:

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

no wonder lockit, your not a real woman '
 
That is a good example of aggressive tone and insult. I'd be interested in the entire back-and-forth of that incident, though.

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

drifa try reading it again this time without the tin foil hat

That sounds abrasive, but not insulting. It's a critique of someone's actions in a specific situation, not specifically about them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

you have yet to say anything pertinent to anything ive said

That can be a perfectly valid response. It's either correct or it isn't. I don't find that offensive at all. It's either factual or not and even if it isn't factual it's not necessarily offensive.

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

im curious, do you realize that your behavior here is a reflection on your sir?

Sounds like a fair question of mindset of whomever it was directed to. How would that be offensive?

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf
#1 show up

#2 shut the fuck up

#3 do as your told

I actually pretty much agreed with that oversimplified thread he started. What's offensive about it?





Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1367188