VaguelyCurious
Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009 From: United Kingdom Status: offline
|
Sorry for the long delay-blame the time difference. quote:
ORIGINAL: Psychonaut23 quote:
I also think you're just winding Lucienne up, but I'm going to assume you believe what you just wrote: that there is no longer any agreement on what is masculine and what is feminine. What you said before, and what started this whole argument, was that you thought submission could not be masculine. Leaving aside the validity of the two statements, if the first one holds then surely the second one is meaningless. No? No. There may be no agreement, but that doesn't mean that masculine and feminine don't mean anything. It just means that most people have gone crazy on stupid juice. But if we have all gone crazy on stupid juice (nice expression, shame you insist on expressing the sentiment-I wouldn't call the feminist fight for equality crazy), doesn't that mean there is no point in having the original argument at all? If we can't find common ground on what constitutes masculinity or femininity (and the more of your posts I read the more I am convinced this is the case-you are coming at this from a very different angle to anyone else here, which is your prerogative, but it does make it difficult to see things from your point of view) then is there any point in discussing whether or not submission can be masculine, domination feminine, etc? quote:
I mean basically I think you're all just wrong, and kinda dumb to boot. Sorry if that offends anyone. (I'm not really sorry.) You said in another post that a) I was intelligent (although I don't see why you're singling me out and still insulting RedMagic, Lockit et al), and b) you had never insulted me. I just want to flag this part of your post up in that context. quote:
I get along best with people who either a) know what they're talking about or b) know they don't know anything and thus adopt a student mind. It's the people (I won't name names. I won't name names. I won't name names.) who don't realize that they don't know anything and should be learning, but insist on telling those who know more that they are wrong, who provoke incivility from me. Please could you read that statement again? Do you think that if you weren't you, you would get along with yourself? (I know the syntax of that sentence is painful, something for which I apologize, but I was woken up at wtf am by some idiot setting off the fire alarm with their shower, and I haven't quite recovered yet.) quote:
I'm very Zen. In Zen, the roshi (master) simply slaps stupid students upside the head until they learn to adopt a student mind. Many roshi even have long sticks they lay next to them as they teach, so they can smack students without having to get up. I'd also point out that in Zen the students have accepted the roshi as their master. They have come to him to ask for learning. He doesn't have the right to whap anyone upside the head who has not submitted to him. We have come to you for learning on the topic of masculinity and femininity, we have come to discuss Lady A's penchant for training up gentlemanly submissives. While that analogy is cute, I don't think it is particularly applicable here.
_____________________________
Sthetic on FetLife.
|