Elisabella
Posts: 3939
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: allthatjaz I agree with this. Before I found the scene I used to use men. I didn't know how to channel my dominance and although the men I was with obviously enjoyed it to an extent, they didn't really understand it and neither did I. Retaliations where the norm from vanilla men I dated. They would allow me to push so much before their conscience pricked them. It didn't matter if they enjoyed it or not because it came under the heading 'this isn't normal is it?' Those were still very kinky times but not happy ones. I didn't understand why I wanted to hurt a man and make him suffer when I became sexually turned on. I knew I didn't hate men but I think it sometimes came over that way. We were just confused. One vanilla dominant man comes to mind, though this was many years ago. He would always look out for women who he called 'sexual sluts'. He tended to attract submissive minds but they were submissive minds that were very much in the vanilla world and he would use them, talk about them and spit them out. I believe if a man like that had found the scene, he could of channeled what he liked and learnt to embrace it and respect the women he was with. Between my break up and meeting Steve I dated a couple of vanilla guys. I discovered a kinky side very quickly but thats only because I have no inhibitions when it comes to talking openly about it. Its only living the lifestyle that has enabled me to go down a route with a vanilla guy where other women dare not tread. -FR- My best friend is like that, she's very dominant, and even sadistic in her relationships, but doesn't identify as a domme or dominatrix or "BDSM" or any of that. Maybe she'd say "kinky" but not seriously, more as a joke. She seems to view her relationships in the framework of what the guy can do for her, but I don't know if she'd be happier identifying as "domme" - in fact I don't think she'd enjoy or be comfortable with that label, or with men who come to her begging to submit, because she's the kind of person who wants them to submit because of who SHE is, not because of who THEY are. I doubt she'd be attracted at all to a self identified submissive man. As for myself, I don't identify as BDSM at all, the only time I call myself "submissive" or "switchy" is on this site, because it's a quick way to get across a general concept, but I don't view myself as "a submissive" when I'm not posting here, I just consider myself a devoted wife and a woman who loves her man. And I don't know if the fact that it turns me on to imagine myself having power over another person (mostly a woman, occasionally a man) would make me a "switch" because I don't see myself that way, I just see myself as a princess :P To me, identifying with BDSM tends to be more kink-oriented, and identifying with D/s or M/s tends to be more lifestyle oriented, and I would say I'm neither. I'm "kinky" in the sense that I like more than just missionary sex or over romantic sex all the time, but I don't identify *myself* as kinky. I'm not a "kinky person" or a "kinkster" or a "BDSM'er" or any of that. I'm just a woman who likes some spice in the bedroom.
|