RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

ResidentSadist -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 3:43:26 PM)

You bitch, how dare you imply I have a bad side!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seriously, I only commented because the replies didn’t have more than partial quotes from the Acid Test in them. Seeing the word count in your reply, at 100 words a minute meant you spent 5 minutes typing it and I thought you might wanna invest equal time actually reading the test since it is proof of the anti-christ.

… bad side … pfffft … only anteaters get on my bad side.
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet
There for a moment I thought I'd gotten on your bad side and I sooooo am not remotely ready for that! LOL Now the bad side of your good side....weeeeelllllll...... [:)]

lovingpet



Rochsub2009 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 3:44:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

quote:

While not every aspect of the article is true, the D side of the D/s dynamic IS a magnet for fakes.

Hmmmm . . . from my side of the fence, it always seemed that the other wau around.

It was somewhere in the the AOL chat room era that lonely net savvy men and women discovered a new bait to attract partners. Submissives numbers far outweigh the Dominants, so if proportionate numbers of fakes were on both sides of the fence, there woud be more fake subs wouldn't there?



i think you may have replied before you finished reading my comment.  In the next paragraph, i went on to talk about the multitude of fake subs out there.



ResidentSadist -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 4:05:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RedMagic1
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
quote:

While not every aspect of the article is true, the D side of the D/s dynamic IS a magnet for fakes.

Hmmmm . . . from my side of the fence, it always seemed that the other wau around.

I have to agree with this, even though RS's kinks and mine are extremely different. Actually, I don't, quite, because I pretty much never deal with doms directly, though I have met ResidentSadist in real life.
… These blame-the-dom posts, like the OP's, are really missing the point. Subs are just as responsible for the BS in online (and real life) BDSM.

Surely you aren’t implying that Doms & subs are equally accountable for the BS ? Why that would be . . . well, it would be realistic.

[image]http://residentsadist.com/pics/FU-im-on-acid.jpg[/image]



Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 4:27:34 PM)

I sincerely started to read that god aweful dribble, found my eyes rolling up in the back of my head. Started to Skim read through the rest of it. Lord, I feel like I should take a hit of acid to straighten out my mind.

In some regards I myself, fail, that test. I get the intentions and points the author was trying to make. But come on here, we are first and foremost human beings.

There's way too many things to comment on, and from what I'm seeing others are covering it somewhat well.

The Last time I was called "Demanding and Pushy and wanting things done my way", I paused for a moment on the phone, and said, "Why Yes, you are absolutely right" and reminded them that I also have Dominant checked marked off on my profile and that I was not on eHarmony either.

Look a stupid article does not provide a solid framework to cover all cases and circumstances, let alone define what is or is not a true DOM or submissive. D/s is a relationship structure, not something that is defined by character or personality traits. If this were true, you might as well throw the concepts of "kicked back Doms" out the window, along with "Extraverted submissives" and etc...

D/s is a relationship structure. D/s is a relationhip structure.. a structure I tell you...

Take some Acid or do whatever it is to do, to expand the mind...



Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 4:34:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: everythingzen
You guys are hilarious...anyway what prompted me to post it was I talk to many girls who get taken advantage of on CM and other sites, and the acid test provides some basic guidelines that would help avoid a lot of that negativity.  It is by no means an 'end all be all' guide to dominants, and if you don't pass that test you aren't a 'true' dominant or anything like that.  It is mainly useful for younger and less experienced submissives, which is why I think there are page long responses against the acid test written by older and more experienced ladies and gentlemen.  


Yeah, well even us guys get taken advantage of on CM (believe it or not). First and foremost, It's important to give them the basic Acid Tests. Gender confirmation, what they really look like, small little honesty tests along the way... The Basic stuff.



lovingpet -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 4:40:49 PM)

Ohhhhhh!!!!!  So you's a cute, cuddly, softer kind of sadist.  I get it now.....  [;)]

Oh, and call me a bitch again, Sir, because I think I just might like that sort of thing!  LOL

As for the article, I am a bit sadistic myself, so if I have to suffer, then Imma takin my partner with me!  There were so many parts quoted throughout the thread, I at least had some clue.  I will take a few truly masochistic moments and read it laters on.

And I agree.  It's them nasty ole anteaters that are mean! 

lovingpet

quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

You bitch, how dare you imply I have a bad side!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Seriously, I only commented because the replies didn’t have more than partial quotes from the Acid Test in them. Seeing the word count in your reply, at 100 words a minute meant you spent 5 minutes typing it and I thought you might wanna invest equal time actually reading the test since it is proof of the anti-christ.

… bad side … pfffft … only anteaters get on my bad side.
quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet
There for a moment I thought I'd gotten on your bad side and I sooooo am not remotely ready for that! LOL Now the bad side of your good side....weeeeelllllll...... [:)]

lovingpet



Whiplashsmile4 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 4:48:38 PM)

To Quote the article "Real BDSM is not for dilettantes or amateurs"... Guess anybody New on the scene is screwed. lol..

I'm just wanting to laugh my fracking ass off here...

First and foremost, this article is geared towards S&M.. and if you are not into S&M I guess it's just vanilla sex. Hello World, BDSM consists of four letters all of which mean something.

Guess people are screwed for wanting a sexually based D/s relationship that does not include S&M.. Frack... they better move on to eHarmony or Match for a hookup. lol



littlewonder -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:08:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: everythingzen

You guys are hilarious...anyway what prompted me to post it was I talk to many girls who get taken advantage of on CM and other sites, and the acid test provides some basic guidelines that would help avoid a lot of that negativity.  It is by no means an 'end all be all' guide to dominants, and if you don't pass that test you aren't a 'true' dominant or anything like that.  It is mainly useful for younger and less experienced submissives, which is why I think there are page long responses against the acid test written by older and more experienced ladies and gentlemen.  


This is even more ludicrous than the original post.
If the women you are running into are this naive and well...not very bright...you really need to get out more dude!





ResidentSadist -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:13:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Whiplashsmile4
... Guess people are screwed for wanting a sexually based D/s relationship that does not include S&M.. Frack... they better move on to eHarmony or Match for a hookup. lol

[image]http://residentsadist.com/pics/FU-eharmony.jpg[/image]



LadyAngelika -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:18:10 PM)

quote:

To Quote the article "Real BDSM is not for dilettantes or amateurs"...


Origin of the word dilettante 1733, borrowing of It. dilettante "lover of music or painting," from dilettare "to delight," from L. delectare (see delight). Originally without negative connotation, "devoted amateur," the pejorative sense emerged late

Origin of the word amateur 1784, "one who has a taste for (something)," from Fr. amateur "lover of," from O.Fr., from L. amatorem (nom. amator) "lover," from amatus, pp. of amare "to love"

But for what other reason would we do it, if not for the pure delight an love of it? ;-)

Both of these terms, dilettante and amateur only became pejorative in opposition to professional in the late 18th century, coinciding I guess with the Revolutions (French, American) and a call for less hedonism and more seriousness.

Well I already have a profession, and I'm a Master in that one too. So in this, in WIITWD, I gloriously exclaim that i'm a dilletante and an amateure and that I follow nobody's rules but mine ;-)

- LA



ResidentSadist -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:36:20 PM)

[image]http://residentsadist.com/pics/FU-legs.jpg[/image]



lusciouslips19 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:43:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

[image]http://residentsadist.com/pics/FU-legs.jpg[/image]



[sm=LMAO.gif]

Daddy Warbuckle,

I love ya![:)]



LadyAngelika -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:46:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist

[image]http://residentsadist.com/pics/FU-legs.jpg[/image]



Oh my goodness!!! I love it! ;-) You know yesterday I opened up a can of whoopass on some man who stole my pic and put it on his profile... but you? Oh no... you get a smooooooch!

Now can you autograph it for me please? I'll cherish it forever!!

- LA



osf -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 5:59:27 PM)

if your dissed on cm message boards your a true dominant



littlewonder -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 6:00:29 PM)

bites tongue...really tries not to say it...someone else say it please..save me.



RedMagic1 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 6:01:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: littlewonder
someone else say it please..save me.

If you're praised on the message boards, you're a true horny net geek?



osf -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 6:02:35 PM)

how about a dominant is anybody she thinks is



sexyred1 -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 6:02:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

if your dissed on cm message boards your a true dominant


Or, you could be dissed on CM message boards if you are a vapid, banal, stupid, holier than thou sub OR Dom or anything in between.

Believe me osf, you are tame compared to some of the hypocritical crap being thrown around lately.

How is Miss Cillie btw?



ResidentSadist -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 6:05:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19
[sm=LMAO.gif]

Daddy Warbuckle,

I love ya![:)]

[image]http://residentsadist.com/pics/FU-lushy.jpg[/image]



osf -> RE: Acid Test for True Dominants (2/2/2010 6:10:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: osf

if your dissed on cm message boards your a true dominant


Or, you could be dissed on CM message boards if you are a vapid, banal, stupid, holier than thou sub OR Dom or anything in between.

Believe me osf, you are tame compared to some of the hypocritical crap being thrown around lately.

How is Miss Cillie btw?


miss cillie is as dominant as ever, i may have to break down and go get her the food she likes, she isnt eating the last bag i got , she just picks up a pellet and shakes her head



Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875