quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

I have to disagree with you here. At least one of the others she has been arguing with in this thread with has a history of a harsh posting style (to each their own!) but I went and re-read her posts on other threads, just to see if you might be correct, but I didn't pick that up at all.

In fact MY posting style is far more harsh than hers; along with a good many others around here. I think she was flamed because 1. she dared to disagree with the majority concensus in this case (which in a way is ironic...she was saying maybe flaming the OP should not be the way to handle this, and she was later mocked by the op)
and 2. she did use an inflamatory style when she disagreed with the majority by calling them the "great ones" or whatever.

So maybe she deserved a little flack, but it went over the top, imo.

(just to reiterate, after reading a bunch of her other posts, I don't see how anyone could accuse her of having a harsh posting style.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

I have to disagree with you here. At least one of the others she has been arguing with in this thread with has a history of a harsh posting style (to each their own!) but I went and re-read her posts on other threads, just to see if you might be correct, but I didn't pick that up at all.

In fact MY posting style is far more harsh than hers; along with a good many others around here. I think she was flamed because 1. she dared to disagree with the majority concensus in this case (which in a way is ironic...she was saying maybe flaming the OP should not be the way to handle this, and she was later mocked by the op)
and 2. she did use an inflamatory style when she disagreed with the majority by calling them the "great ones" or whatever.

So maybe she deserved a little flack, but it went over the top, imo.

(just to reiterate, after reading a bunch of her other posts, I don't see how anyone could accuse her of having a harsh posting style.)

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx
I have to disagree with you here. At least one of the others she has been arguing with in this thread with has a history of a harsh posting style (to each their own!) but I went and re-read her posts on other threads, just to see if you might be correct, but I didn't pick that up at all.

In fact MY posting style is far more harsh than hers; along with a good many others around here. I think she was flamed because 1. she dared to disagree with the majority concensus in this case (which in a way is ironic...she was saying maybe flaming the OP should not be the way to handle this, and she was later mocked by the op)
and 2. she did use an inflamatory style when she disagreed with the majority by calling them the "great ones" or whatever.

So maybe she deserved a little flack, but it went over the top, imo.

(just to reiterate, after reading a bunch of her other posts, I don't see how anyone could accuse her of having a harsh posting style.)

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

Pointing out ones past with the mods wasnt too nice though was it? And the attack on Reds statement because of saying we are responsible for our actions except for maybe things like cancer. I knew Red was using cancer as an example . The leap Luci made from that to Insinuating that Red was accusing people of being responsible for their being a victim of a crime was a really big stretch. No doubt based on their checkered past hostilities. But those are from a time before you were here and you have to go back a couple of years to see that.

They do have a habit of flaming each other though.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx
I have to disagree with you here. At least one of the others she has been arguing with in this thread with has a history of a harsh posting style (to each their own!) but I went and re-read her posts on other threads, just to see if you might be correct, but I didn't pick that up at all.

In fact MY posting style is far more harsh than hers; along with a good many others around here. I think she was flamed because 1. she dared to disagree with the majority concensus in this case (which in a way is ironic...she was saying maybe flaming the OP should not be the way to handle this, and she was later mocked by the op)
and 2. she did use an inflamatory style when she disagreed with the majority by calling them the "great ones" or whatever.

So maybe she deserved a little flack, but it went over the top, imo.

(just to reiterate, after reading a bunch of her other posts, I don't see how anyone could accuse her of having a harsh posting style.)

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

Pointing out ones past with the mods wasnt too nice though was it? And the attack on Reds statement because of saying we are responsible for our actions except for maybe things like cancer. I knew Red was using cancer as an example . The leap Luci made from that to Insinuating that Red was accusing people of being responsible for their being a victim of a crime was a really big stretch. No doubt based on their checkered past hostilities. But those are from a time before you were here and you have to go back a couple of years to see that.

They do have a habit of flaming each other though.

Good points, luscious. It seems to me they both got a little excited, a little emotional, maybe posted without much reflection, perhaps took things too personally. I'm in no position to judge--I've certainly had my moments. (But it's always easier to recognize other people's moments.)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx

I have to disagree with you here. At least one of the others she has been arguing with in this thread with has a history of a harsh posting style (to each their own!) but I went and re-read her posts on other threads, just to see if you might be correct, but I didn't pick that up at all.

In fact MY posting style is far more harsh than hers; along with a good many others around here. I think she was flamed because 1. she dared to disagree with the majority concensus in this case (which in a way is ironic...she was saying maybe flaming the OP should not be the way to handle this, and she was later mocked by the op)
and 2. she did use an inflamatory style when she disagreed with the majority by calling them the "great ones" or whatever.

So maybe she deserved a little flack, but it went over the top, imo.

(just to reiterate, after reading a bunch of her other posts, I don't see how anyone could accuse her of having a harsh posting style.)

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: lusciouslips19

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: xxblushesxx
I have to disagree with you here. At least one of the others she has been arguing with in this thread with has a history of a harsh posting style (to each their own!) but I went and re-read her posts on other threads, just to see if you might be correct, but I didn't pick that up at all.

In fact MY posting style is far more harsh than hers; along with a good many others around here. I think she was flamed because 1. she dared to disagree with the majority concensus in this case (which in a way is ironic...she was saying maybe flaming the OP should not be the way to handle this, and she was later mocked by the op)
and 2. she did use an inflamatory style when she disagreed with the majority by calling them the "great ones" or whatever.

So maybe she deserved a little flack, but it went over the top, imo.

(just to reiterate, after reading a bunch of her other posts, I don't see how anyone could accuse her of having a harsh posting style.)

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

Pointing out ones past with the mods wasnt too nice though was it? And the attack on Reds statement because of saying we are responsible for our actions except for maybe things like cancer. I knew Red was using cancer as an example . The leap Luci made from that to Insinuating that Red was accusing people of being responsible for their being a victim of a crime was a really big stretch. No doubt based on their checkered past hostilities. But those are from a time before you were here and you have to go back a couple of years to see that.

They do have a habit of flaming each other though.

Good points, luscious. It seems to me they both got a little excited, a little emotional, maybe posted without much reflection, perhaps took things too personally. I'm in no position to judge--I've certainly had my moments. (But it's always easier to recognize other people's moments.)

Since I apparently am being mentioned after days away from this thread, I thought I would simply say to Luscious, thanks for backing me up and to xxblushesxx and lucylucy, neither of you know me or my posting style or what goes on behind the scenes, and I have seen both of you snarky quite a bit, but would not bring myself into your shit, as you did mine, here.

I guess it is ok to be snarky when you both are doing it and you have no idea of history.

I would appreciate if you ladies, as well as slaveluci, put me on hide and ignore my posts should they prove so provocative to you.

I will say this, I am somewhat surprised that you both would jump on me when the other party was just as much at fault.

But I always consider the source, so with all the important things going on in my life right now, I won't go further at the risk of more flaming.

Have a fab day ladies.

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

Like I said earlier... when one goes around digging up stinky fish, the stanky juice tends to get all over the person "digging" it up...

I hope you are well today red, and you are in my thoughts

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

Detective work? What on EARTH does this have to do with either of you. Like to instigate much?

quote:

Where is that hot cleavage shot??

quote:

It wouldn't have anything to do with me except that it unfolded on a public board and to read the thread, I had to wade through all that stuff. If you want something to remain private, I recommend conducting it in private. I don't see how what I said is instigating anything at all.

I'm sorry you're stressed and on pain meds. That sucks. But please don't take it out on me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: lucylucy

xx, nice detective work. I agree with your take on all this, for what it's worth.

Detective work? What on EARTH does this have to do with either of you. Like to instigate much?

It wouldn't have anything to do with me except that it unfolded on a public board and to read the thread, I had to wade through all that stuff. If you want something to remain private, I recommend conducting it in private. I don't see how what I said is instigating anything at all.

I'm sorry you're stressed and on pain meds. That sucks. But please don't take it out on me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

It wouldn't have anything to do with me except that it unfolded on a public board and to read the thread, I had to wade through all that stuff. If you want something to remain private, I recommend conducting it in private. I don't see how what I said is instigating anything at all.

I'm sorry you're stressed and on pain meds. That sucks. But please don't take it out on me.

As someone that was around when all this shit originally hit the fan, well it is OLD ANCIENT shit... like petrified shit. Why drag it up? Why keep it going? Why not let it die without the commentary?

At that time sexyred wasn't all that happy with me either... but you know what, we have big girl pants, and we put them on, and we try not to soil them too much...

Peace out man! Let it go!

quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

quote:

It wouldn't have anything to do with me except that it unfolded on a public board and to read the thread, I had to wade through all that stuff. If you want something to remain private, I recommend conducting it in private. I don't see how what I said is instigating anything at all.

I'm sorry you're stressed and on pain meds. That sucks. But please don't take it out on me.

As someone that was around when all this shit originally hit the fan, well it is OLD ANCIENT shit... like petrified shit. Why drag it up? Why keep it going? Why not let it die without the commentary?

At that time sexyred wasn't all that happy with me either... but you know what, we have big girl pants, and we put them on, and we try not to soil them too much...

Peace out man! Let it go!

Yeah!! Me and julia are BFF's now, so there!!