xssve
Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009 Status: offline
|
There is a real debate going on that reflects the clash between "identity" and role assignment - to riff off of domiguy here, having an "unusual" gender identity is a choice, we do choose our roles, but in the sense that we tend to choose that with with which we are happy and comfortable, and we are happiest with that which reflects our identity. Often, even if it happens to be inconvenient for ourselves or others, or even subject to considerable opposition - because role assignment is what "society" does, and they assign roles that are convenient for them, whether it's racial, socio-economic, or gender stereotyping, your "happiness" or to what extent it reflects your internal identity is really not their concern. In fact, you can get away with being as queer as a Three dollar bill as long as you play the outward role of denouncing it for the convenience of "society"- shit, it's practically become the definition of the republican party, they're very much obsessed with the appearance of things, and are apparent; more comfortable with this elaborate, practically farcical facade, than they are with just dealing with things as they are, and allowing people to be who they are - why "society" would collapse - chaos - cats fucking dogs, the whole thing.
< Message edited by xssve -- 2/20/2010 9:41:52 AM >
|