RE: Tea Party Crashers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


FirmhandKY -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:47:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol


quote:

ORIGINAL: RacerJim
That Doctor did not advertise he'd refuse to treat patients who voted for a POTUS he disagrees with.


He fucking well did, and you know it - he wrote, texto: "If you voted for Obama, seek urology care elsewhere."

Now, you can start pontificating about semantics if you like. Nobody's fooled.

Liar.


New political word definition:

Liar: what you call someone when you disagree about something, and can't, or don't want to actually engage them in an honest debate.  Especially useful when you've lost the argument on it's merits.

Since I've been called this, in this thread already, and have seen it in enough threads from all sides of the political spectrum, I thought I'd clarify what it now actually meant, as the dictionary definition is so outa date. [:)]

Firm




kittinSol -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:49:38 AM)

Oh, go away, will you - the hijack comes from that Jim guy. Play cops and robbers with him [8|].





mnottertail -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:50:48 AM)

Why is kittinSol involved here?  Her point was on topic and very much involved with Tea Party Crashers (where, by way of illustration she gave 2 positions that countervaled logical thought between them) and Racie went flying off the gutwagon. She has a right to defend.

Talk to Racer, and Racer only if we are being punctilious about this sort of thing.

Ron  




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:51:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: brainiacsub

You are 6 pages behind the 8 ball. This has already been posted and discussed in this thread.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=3159931


Actually, he's bringing the story up to date.  It is not redundant.

Firm


You mean there's more? Oh terrific...9 more pages of this crap...can't wait.




Jeffff -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:54:13 AM)

If I did pray, I would pray everyday that this forum is not a microcosm of America.




Lucylastic -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:54:39 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Why is kittinSol involved here?  Her point was on topic and very much involved with Tea Party Crashers (where, by way of illustration she gave 2 positions that countervaled logical thought between them) and Racie went flying off the gutwagon. She has a right to defend.

Talk to Racer, and Racer only if we are being punctilious about this sort of thing.

Ron  

Ditto
Well said





kittinSol -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 9:56:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Why is kittinSol involved here?  Her point was on topic and very much involved with Tea Party Crashers (where, by way of illustration she gave 2 positions that countervaled logical thought between them) and Racie went flying off the gutwagon. She has a right to defend.

Talk to Racer, and Racer only if we are being punctilious about this sort of thing.

Ron  


Thank you, Ron - although I have a feeling this will fall on deaf ears [:D] .




brainiacsub -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 10:00:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

If I did pray, I would pray everyday that this forum is not a microcosm of America.

There is no God you twit. I'm watching CNN right now and it's the same shit...only this is funnier.




mnottertail -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 10:02:56 AM)

Well, in any case....If the guy is doing this crap on public sector computers and it is not in anyway connected with his job, I hope they fire the fuckhead.

We have enough challenges in education that we need to grapple with, and don't need guys like me scanning porn or blogging political bullshit or any number of other things with public property, when we need them to do their job.

I don't really give a fuck if he is infiltrating or regurgitating the teabaggers.  Do it on his own shit, on his own time.

Ron (ps. I own this fucking computer, and my time, paid for myself). 




Lucylastic -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 10:06:09 AM)

So how now are the tea baggers gonna rely on their numbers at rallies if these terrible terrible traitors(crashers) are "infiltrating" their ranks??
I mean they cant be reliable numbers  can they?
tens of millions turns out to be tens of hundreds?
course there are  shit disturbers on both sides
this board is a prime example!!!
hehh




kittinSol -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 10:06:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I don't really give a fuck if he is infiltrating or regurgitating the teabaggers.  Do it on his own shit, on his own time.



I couldn't agree more.




Sanity -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 12:04:00 PM)



Hmmm.... I wonder which ones are the phonies....   [;)]



[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston1.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston2.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston3.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston4.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston9.jpg[/image]


[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston10.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston11.jpg[/image]

[image]http://www.wnd.com/images/boston12.jpg[/image]




mnottertail -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 12:16:15 PM)

I don't know for sure, they all look fuckin' stoooooooooooooooooopid though.

Ron 




subrob1967 -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 12:28:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

show me anything where it says in that poll that the teabaggers are not overly racist?


You can't prove a negative, but you knew that.




slvemike4u -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 12:34:49 PM)

Right subrob...sometimes you just have to sit back and let a man's own words indict them....yep...you betcha!




Lucylastic -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 12:45:31 PM)

Not one misspelled word either...apart from Taxis...but being as Taxis its a play on a word.. and a piss take..
so Servant WAS wrong, snicker
Now I wonder what baggers are going to use when it seems that taxes are less now ??? According to the CBO

[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/fun/giggles/teaparty1.jpg[/image]
and
[image]http://www.lucylasticslair.com/fun/giggles/teaparty2.jpg[/image]





kittinSol -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 1:32:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I don't know for sure, they all look fuckin' stoooooooooooooooooopid though.

Ron 



The dude with the "More fun, less taxis" is cute [8D] .




FirmhandKY -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 1:36:27 PM)

FR:

You know, reading some other stuff about the TEA parties, it has occurred to me that this "infiltration" stuff may actually be a good thing for the parties.

First, it's pretty evident to anyone who isn't screeching their obvious hatred to and about the parties, that the level of animosity that is being directed towards the party are by people who will never, ever sympathize or support either them or their objectives.

But, by their very attacks, their attempts to discredit, and their gang style reactions to the parties, they are actually doing the parties some favors.

First, they are giving them attention, and helping people who might not have gotten involved the opportunity to find out for themselves, and increase their supporters.

Second, it tends to inculcate a sense of group membership, and strengthen the bonds of belief (the old "us versus them"), thereby strengthening the will and ideology of the movement.

Finally, it will likely force the parties to a more centralized organization, with it's own "strike forces" and counter-action plans to discredit the people and organizations who are trying to besmirch, belittle and destroy them.

Maybe this "infiltration" crap and the type of hatred and animosity - such as displayed on these very forums - is a good thing, in the long run, if you are a TEA partier, or support their goals.

Things to think about, anyway.

Firm




Lucylastic -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 1:38:16 PM)

I could certainly spend a few hours enjoying  his offerings...maybe with a gag...but definitely not hard on the eyes




FirmhandKY -> RE: Tea Party Crashers (4/15/2010 1:39:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Not one misspelled word either...apart from Taxis...but being as Taxis its a play on a word.. and a piss take..
so Servant WAS wrong, snicker
Now I wonder what baggers are going to use when it seems that taxes are less now ??? According to the CBO

"The other 95% say thanks for our tax cuts , Obama!"


The second photo ("The other 95% say thanks for our tax cuts , Obama!") is interesting.

Obviously, his spelling is pretty good.  And his logic and math skills are pretty bad.

Firm




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875