quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

WRONG. My dad did six combat tours in Iraq. I've seen some of the paperwork my dad saved from his Navy days. Included in that paperwork were award orders for one of the tours he did in Vietnam. He was based out of Coronado and Subic.

Again, unlike you, my dad's service was real. You never served in Vietnam.

You said your dad was dead if so how did he do six tours in Iraq?
I did not say your squid daddy did not serve I said he did not do six years in viet nam.

For someone that goes out of his way to act like my post says something other than what I actually meant; you do a piss poor job deviating from what I wrote to interpret it consistent with what I've argued. This is where reading comprehension comes in. Throughout this thread, I've repeatedly said that my dad did six combat tours in Vietnam. That one brain cell of yours should've seen what I actually meant. The fact that you could see things in the rest of my posts that I didn't communicate should translate into your being able to see in my post what I actually meant.

Dude you seem to be the only mind reader here. You post that your dead squid daddy did six tours in iraq. I asked how that was possible.

Not only does this indicate that you have piss poor reading comprehension abilities, you have zero common sense. This goes in the same category as your needing to read what I write with the intentions of understanding what I'm saying.

So now it is our job to read your mind when you can't even post your own thoughts clearly.

I countered your unqualified claims about my dad's combat tours to Vietnam. My dad did do six combat tours in Vietnam. Notice that I didn't say that he did 6 years, I said he did six tours.

So this is your admission that your squid daddy did not do six years in viet nam as you implied. Perhaps you might be so kind as to tell us how many years your squid daddy did in viet nam?

My mentioning the fact that my dad served is just me comparing him to you. Unlike my dad, you didn't serve in Vietnam,

Now you are a mind reader and an all knowing savant of what is and is not.

and you more than likely didn't serve in the military. If you "did" in fact, "serve," your posts are doing you a terrible injustice.

Actually my post are causing your knickers to be in such a bunch you can't even sit down.

quote:

What? Are you that arrogant that you're telling me that everybody on the opposition has somebody that they've designated to meet other people for themselves? And how the fuck can you peg these people from a website?

quote:

Everybody used to believe that the sun orbited the Earth. Since everybody believed this, did it automatically follow that the Sun actually orbited the Earth, simply because everybody believed it did? YES [ ] NO [ ].

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

Also, "since you got out"? Are you fucking kidding me? The best case scenario for you is that you did "serve," but never combat deployed. The worst case scenario is that you never served. Based on your hatred for the troops, I'd say that you never served.

Now that is a interesting jump in your logic process....where do you get that I hate the troops.
I may feel that many are ignorant and ill informed some may be as dumb as a stone but nowhere have I mentioned any hatred for them...are you projecting?

That's not a jump, but consistent with what I get from reading your posts. This isn't the first thread where you and I have clashed. Your demeanor, as demonstrated in your posts, show that you hate the troops. You could say that you "don't" hate the troops all you want, I look at your conduct on these boards. You're not the only one that hates the troops here. What I've bolded in red in your quote? That gives your true position away, you hate the military.

The reality is that the troops have a first-hand account of what's going on in the military. When it comes to Iraq and Afghanistan? Those troops that deployed to those countries have a first hand account of what takes place in those countries. Military service gives them a vantage point that someone that isn't in the military doesn't have. What I've bolded in red above shows your reactions to the facts that they express based on their first hand experiences.

You, having only received filtered information from the frontlines, have no legs to stand on when accusing many service members being "dumb" or "ill informed." Based on what you've said here, I know for a fact that you're seriously ill informed. If I were to come up with one word describing your knowledge on the topic we're debating, I'd say, "clueless."

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

This is where you drop the ball.

The OP has a groovier appendage. One can only dream of life on a face chair.

That would be another mega difference of opinion.

Stated based on your bias and disagreement with my position. The reality?

Every woman that has sat on my face had a great time. Women who have sat on my face outside of BDSM, aka vanilla, got possessive of me and reacted like they've never gotten their snatch eaten out before. Every woman that has sat on my face had no regrets. It didn't matter if these women were straight, bi, American, etc.

It is so cute when little boys brag about their talents.

Do you see how ridiculous you sound when I add the conversation back in? Look at the highlighted conversation. A poster jumped in and talked about the advantages of a face chair. Lady Boom Boom jumped in and tried to talk that down, based on her extreme bias against my argument. I jump in and edged toward specifics on how a face chair gives a better advantage to a woman, than, say, your limp friend.

Your response is just another example of you with your head shoved up your ass. What's really funny is watching you struggle to shove your head further up your ass, rather than the other direction. Trying to keep the strawman company?

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I knew 3 guys in Iraq.   They sure are nothing like the OP.  They are not as detailed.

All 3 could sum up Iraq in less then a paragraph.

Hunkie...that is because they are "poseurs". That is if they disagree with the o.p. I am sure you have gleaned that from the past 60 + pages of rant by the "soldier" who knows all there is to know about the sand box. He is an enlisted man who has traveled the length and breadth of the country noting all and bringing all of it's detail back to share with us ignorati.
The next time you have one of those soldier boys with his feet up in the air, ask him how much of the country they were able to see. Of course they would all speak arabic so they would be able to communicate with all of the locals that they visited. I wonder how fluent our "soldier" is in arabic...I am sure that would have made his gulivarian escapades in iraq much easier thus allowing him to bring us spoon fed fools the "twue scoop" on what is going on over there because all of the news people are "liberals" who hate amerika but the officers who control them are helpless because the government hates amerika also.

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: EbonyWood

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

Every woman that has sat on my face had a great time.

Any of them ever take the opportunity to take a huge dump?

They must have been tempted.

It's amusing how liberals react to someone exercising their freedom of speech. For instance, Al Pieda throwing custard cream pies at An Coulter. What's this clown's contribution? He reacts to the facts by symbolically throwing feces at me. Liberals are all about "the free exchange of ideas," as long as it's their ideas that get shared, and nothing dares challenge it. Dare challenge a liberal, and they'll try to find ways to "shut you up."

This clown isn't the only one though. I recently received a PM from a frustrated liberal attempting to shut me down; his message had a veiled threat.

quote:

I've combat deployed to that country

quote:

Hence the fact that you're dense. She expressed her opinion that we were "involved" in a "pissing" contest. You, being a reject in real life, with women not wanting to have anything to do with you, started perving after her. That's the second woman on this thread that you perved after, wouldn't be surprised if you perved after many more woman on this board. Perhaps a change of attitude, as well as a change in focus in the bedroom, would let women overlook your ED problems.

quote:

You'd have to be "blind" to make that comment. I read what you quoted from the UN charter. It didn't prove my argument wrong, all you did was show text written to address symmetrical warfare. The people writing that charter didn't realize that this was what they were doing. But in terms of 21st Century Warfare, that's precisely what they were doing.

quote:

REAL Veterans know that I'm being truthful, and what I say happens in the military is actually what happens.

So only those vets who agree with you are "twue veterans" and all who disagree with you are nothing but lying posers.
That certainly makes it easier for you to claim you have proved something

quote:

[color=black}
"Can you tell all of us ignorant children what it means when you say that halliburton is no longer supplying logistic services in iraq?" -- thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

thompsonx: Just like your squid daddy leaving his post to show a certified welder how to do his job... REPEAT POINT

A fire watch assigned to a welder would be in that welder's vicinity, with a fire extinguisher. He has to be near the welder in order to quickly put a fire out if the welder starts a fire. When my dad did the welder's job, he was still in his station. This should've been obvious to you if you served. I just love the way you prove me right with your actions. If you served, your posts don't do you any justice.

You seem to know as little about welding as you do about being a soldier.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I knew 3 guys in Iraq.   They sure are nothing like the OP.  They are not as detailed.

All 3 could sum up Iraq in less then a paragraph.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

thompsonx: So are you now saying that knocking an offecer on his azz was wrong and the enlisted man doing the punching should and did go to the brig? No you are just dancing as usual.

Are you THAT dense that even after I keep telling you the same thing, you're going to have two different interpretations of what I said? I've constantly shown you this exchange:

"Officer issues stupid orders
Someone's, or his own, wisdom indicates a better option, but he goes against better judgment.
His orders are followed.
Soldiers get killed, injured as a result.
Information is received that indicated that the mission didn't have to happen.
Officer gets knocked on his azz."

Both of these are your responses to my showing the above scenario, and challenging you to find where I said what you allegedly said:

"So in your military it is ok for enlisted men to punch out officers as long as they actually follow his orders" --thompsonx

"So are you now saying that knocking an offecer on his azz was wrong and the enlisted man doing the punching should and did go to the brig?" --thompsonx

If anybody is dancing around, it's you. God I love making this braindead poser look stupid with his own words!

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
…has pegged everyones meeter.

What? Are you that arrogant that you’re telling me that everybody on the opposition has somebody that they’ve designated to meet other people for themselves? And how the fuck can you peg these people from a website?

Meeter: Attendant, a person who is present and participates in a meeting; one who meets. (Princeton, wordnetweb)

My posts must be pretty damn good to be able to peg a meeter from within this message board.

Doesn’t your own medicine taste great?

But you see, unlike you, I have common sense. I knew, from reading comprehension abilities far superior to yours, what you were talking about. Even though you mentioned an actual job position, for a person, I had the intelligence to determine that you were talking about something else.

When people have no argument they jump on spelling errors...I like to leave bait out for people like that...it's nice to know that you did not disapoint me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: herfacechair
Entire statement added back in to put things back into context.


Here's a saying from one of the leadership courses they teach in the military:

"What's wrong is wrong, even if the majority think it's right."

And

"What's right is right, even if the majority think it's wrong."

These describe certain instances, like the opposition's argument here. What's wrong is wrong describes the majority posters thinking that I'm "full of shit." What's right in this instance? The argument that I'm advancing against your drivel, as well as those that you call, "the majority on this board." Your statement amounts to inductive fallacy. It doesn't reflect the facts, and it assumes that your argument is "right" because the majority that post here essentially said the same thing as you.

So, to test your inductive fallacy, here's the same question again:

Everybody used to believe that the sun orbited the Earth. Since everybody believed this, did it automatically follow that the Sun actually orbited the Earth, simply because everybody believed it did? YES [ ] NO [ ]. (NOTE: thompsonx only quoted this part so that he could take me out of context.)

Simply copy and paste that question, put an "X" in the appropriate box and spare me your BS.

Your failure to answer this question will prove that you have no confidence in your statement. It also causes you to forfeit asking me questions, or expecting me to answer your questions.

So your point is that the majority is never right and the minority is always right?