RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department

RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/6/2010 6:12:42 PM)
Why would anyone believe anything to ever type?

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/6/2010 7:06:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Why would anyone believe anything to ever type? At least my posts have substance, not stalking someone like you stalk me. Have a take on a topic other than me for a change.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/6/2010 7:14:07 PM)
No they don't. You make silly ass proclamations. When you are called out, you never offer any evidence. You just walk away.

Sanity -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/6/2010 8:14:03 PM)
There would be riots, and FOX News wouldn't be the only channel covering it. quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse We all know what woul happen if a white supremacist group was on tape intimidating minority voters. All hell would break loose.

Brain -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/6/2010 8:32:12 PM)
I said before in other threads that the law is not for everyone and you can't fight City Hall. I learned a long time ago they do whatever they want. This story really doesn't do much for me after all the discrimination and injustice black people have had to deal with. quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity I'm sure Keith Olbermann and Chris Mathews were all over this one - Democrat racists are running the country: quote: Ex-Official Accuses Justice Department of Racial Bias in Black Panther Case In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white victims. J. Christian Adams, testifying Tuesday before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, said that "over and over and over again," the department showed "hostility" toward those cases. He described the Black Panther case as one example of that -- he defended the legitimacy of the suit and said his "blood boiled" when he heard a Justice official claim the case wasn't solid. "It is false," Adams said of the claim. "We abetted wrongdoing and abandoned law-abiding citizens," he later testified. The department abandoned the New Black Panther case last year. It stemmed from an incident on Election Day in 2008 in Philadelphia, where members of the party were videotaped in front of a polling place, dressed in military-style uniforms and allegedly hurling racial slurs while one brandished a night stick. The Bush Justice Department brought the first case against three members of the group, accusing them in a civil complaint of violating the Voter Rights Act. The Obama administration initially pursued the case, winning a default judgment in federal court in April 2009 when the Black Panther members did not appear in court. But then the administration moved to dismiss the charges the following month after getting one of the New Black Panther members to agree to not carry a "deadly weapon" near a polling place until 2012. Full article at: Http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/06/ex-official-accuses-justice-department-racial-bias-black-panther-case/

Owner59 -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/6/2010 9:27:08 PM)
This non-story isn`t new.The cons have been trying to bat this into the news for months.This is just a stunt. There`s no new news.None.Nothing`s changed as far case goes. Except for the bushie pushing the case, quiting. Big whop.Yawn. Now what do you call it when a bunch of conservative political operatives, push a bogus story of racism in the Obama administration.Using all the hot buttons,armed black men,Black Panthers,back Attorney General,etc.,and those images of angry,scary black men.And the leap that because they are all black,the AG cutting the Panthers a break. That`s the definition of race baiting.This is as disgusting as it gets. These are the kinds of dirty tricks cons need to do.This is what racists do and what racists repeat. The other hallmarks of con dirty tricks this story has:........ preposition that the story is true(see ACORN/climate change emails),that the main stream media is ignoring the story(see conspiracy nuts) and the over-reach,that because this little bushie quits the AG has to step down.

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 12:14:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff No they don't. You make silly ass proclamations. When you are called out, you never offer any evidence. You just walk away. I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else.

Elisabella -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 12:56:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else. Don't fucking say shit if you're not going to back it up. It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, the fact that you made a positive assertation means that the burden of proof is on you. You have to demonstrate that your fact is true, not just sit there like a fucking tard saying "nuh-uh, you go prove me wrong instead." The people you disagree with are too busy doing their own googling to do yours for you, don't be a lazy creep. fucking rant pet peeve blah blah blah

willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 1:27:08 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else. Don't fucking say shit if you're not going to back it up. It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, the fact that you made a positive assertation means that the burden of proof is on you. You have to demonstrate that your fact is true, not just sit there like a fucking tard saying "nuh-uh, you go prove me wrong instead." The people you disagree with are too busy doing their own googling to do yours for you, don't be a lazy creep. fucking rant pet peeve blah blah blah Sorry about your pet peeve. I dont "google" for most of my posts. Its work I do and have done for nearly 35 years. I dont have to demonstrate a fucking thing....Ive done a lot more "homework" on these issues then every poster here combined. Dont like what I say, prove it wrong, ignore it, or stfu.

Elisabella -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 2:12:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Sorry about your pet peeve. I dont "google" for most of my posts. Its work I do and have done for nearly 35 years. I dont have to demonstrate a fucking thing....Ive done a lot more "homework" on these issues then every poster here combined. Dont like what I say, prove it wrong, ignore it, or stfu. Fair enough. Ignored.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 3:15:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff No they don't. You make silly ass proclamations. When you are called out, you never offer any evidence. You just walk away. I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else. You said that 3 times in history supply side economics created jobs. Wrong and I posted the charts. You said the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle did NOT say that a particle's speed and location can not be known at the same time. You are a liar and a douche

Politesub53 -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:52:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy Sorry about your pet peeve. I dont "google" for most of my posts. Its work I do and have done for nearly 35 years. I dont have to demonstrate a fucking thing....Ive done a lot more "homework" on these issues then every poster here combined. Dont like what I say, prove it wrong, ignore it, or stfu. One would think that after 35 years you could get your facts right. This is a public form, so if you make wild claims you can expect to be called on them.

truckinslave -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:28:59 AM)
Going forward, there is only one acceptable course of action for similar events. Citizen arrests, followed by private civil suits. When the government will not enforce the law, citizens must. (See: Arizona, immigration)

Sanity -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:34:15 AM)
Your logic is really fucked up. What about white people who worked to help blacks and other persecuted people? How do they deserve the Obama justice department. And after so much of this, will white racism be excusable too? quote: ORIGINAL: Brain I said before in other threads that the law is not for everyone and you can't fight City Hall. I learned a long time ago they do whatever they want. This story really doesn't do much for me after all the discrimination and injustice black people have had to deal with.

Moonhead -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:37:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity Your logic is really fucked up. What about white people who worked to help blacks and other persecuted people? How do they deserve the Obama justice department. And after so much of this, will white racism be excusable too? It will be the next time Sir Nose D'void OfFunk starts trying to intimidate the residents in Chocolate City into not voting. As I recall there was a lot less fuss over Bush's GOP spreading ludicrous scare stories to keep the blacks away from the polls a couple of times than there was over the current storm in a teacup. Then there's all of the fuss from the GOP over Acorn's evil agenda of encouraging those Americans who aren't likely to be invited to join a golf club to vote as well. For some reason the GOP doesn't seen to like the notion of black people voting. Can't imagine why that should be. So in brief: white racism is always excusable, if you happen to be a Republican. Great, isn't it?

rulemylife -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:38:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff No they don't. You make silly ass proclamations. When you are called out, you never offer any evidence. You just walk away. I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else. Who the fuck are you trying to kid? You don't even do research to prove your own points. You throw out whatever lame idea pops into your head and then you challenge everyone to prove it is wrong. Edited to add that you have been proven wrong on numerous occasions, you just tuck your tail between your legs when it happens and never bother to respond further. I guess if you ignore it it then it never really happened. Is that how it works Willbeur?

Moonhead -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:43:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff No they don't. You make silly ass proclamations. When you are called out, you never offer any evidence. You just walk away. I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else. Who the fuck are you trying to kid? You don't even do research to prove your own points. You throw out whatever lame idea pops into your head and then you challenge everyone to prove it is wrong. Edited to add that you have been proven wrong on numerous occasions, you just tuck your tail between your legs when it happens and never bother to respond further. I guess if you ignore it it then it never really happened. Is that how it works Willbeur? If he hadn't stated above that he's held down his current job for thirty five years, I'd suspect him of being the Pope. Who else is infallible?

Aynne88 -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:44:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy I dont do peoples research for them. Its not my responsibility. Not a single fact I have ever posted has ever been proven wrong. Now go stalk someone else. Don't fucking say shit if you're not going to back it up. It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, the fact that you made a positive assertation means that the burden of proof is on you. You have to demonstrate that your fact is true, not just sit there like a fucking tard saying "nuh-uh, you go prove me wrong instead." The people you disagree with are too busy doing their own googling to do yours for you, don't be a lazy creep. fucking rant pet peeve blah blah blah QFT Elisabella. Wilbur, you are so fucking lame in these assertions it's sad. Jesus man, learn how to at least pretend you know what you are talking about.....that "I won't do your homework for you" bullshit, did you seriously try and pull that? I am embarrassed for you.

Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:47:07 AM)
And yet, he gets up set when I question why anyone would pay attention to him? Hell, even Pops and Sanity ignore him.

rulemylife -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:51:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: truckinslave Going forward, there is only one acceptable course of action for similar events. Citizen arrests, followed by private civil suits. When the government will not enforce the law, citizens must. (See: Arizona, immigration) [image]http://www.google.com/images/icons/sectionized_ui/play_c.gif[/image]Citizens Arrest

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875