RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Sanity -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:12:16 PM)


DG's just a punk kid, on my ignore too. I seriously doubt he's old enough to be on here.


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


If DG is DomiGuy I take it he posted something in response to my challenge to DomKen. Wouldnt know...he's been on ignore for months.




Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:46:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff





And you still have DG's 300.00


If DG is DomiGuy I take it he posted something in response to my challenge to DomKen. Wouldnt know...he's been on ignore for months.



Thats's interesting. Since you accepted his 3-1 bet

What a douche





willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:47:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff


quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff





And you still have DG's 300.00


If DG is DomiGuy I take it he posted something in response to my challenge to DomKen. Wouldnt know...he's been on ignore for months.



Thats's interesting. Since you accepted his 3-1 bet

What a douche




I couldnt have accepted something I didnt read. You are confused. And 3:1? I wouldnt take anything less than 10:1, since DOJ can stonewall as long as Obama lets them. DomKen's 50:1 is a huge overlay though.




Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:50:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

There is no doubt that the 1965 Immigration law was designed to replace the White majority with people of color. Howard Dean rejoiced in the fact:

"The fact is that the Democratic party is made up of lots of different people, and we’re all minorities in our party. That’s the way it’s been for a long, long time. We’re the party of opportunity. So the demographic trends favor the Democrats.

If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican Party."

National Public Radio on Friday, August 15, 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee



The "post-racial" Ohblahblah administration. LMAO.


Hey fuckface....How much on the bet? You are getting 50 to 1 on a thousand from Domken. I am willing to only take a hundred off your dumb ass at 3-1.

What say yea, big mouth?






willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:53:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff


quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

There is no doubt that the 1965 Immigration law was designed to replace the White majority with people of color. Howard Dean rejoiced in the fact:

"The fact is that the Democratic party is made up of lots of different people, and we’re all minorities in our party. That’s the way it’s been for a long, long time. We’re the party of opportunity. So the demographic trends favor the Democrats.

If you look at folks of color, even women, they’re more successful in the Democratic Party than they are in the white, uh, excuse me, in the [laughs] Republican Party."

National Public Radio on Friday, August 15, 2008, Howard Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee



The "post-racial" Ohblahblah administration. LMAO.


Hey fuckface....How much on the bet? You are getting 50 to 1 on a thousand from Domken. I am willing to only take a hundred off your dumb ass at 3-1.

What say yea, big mouth?





Thats nice, now you see why he's on ignore.




Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:53:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I can't believe Wilbeur won't take the bet.

It smacks of cowardice.


I said Id take the bet. Its Kendoll thats backing out.

domiguy
Internet prick




Posts: 11037
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline my $300 against your $100.





You took 3-1 for 100.00




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 4:59:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I can't believe Wilbeur won't take the bet.

It smacks of cowardice.


I said Id take the bet. Its Kendoll thats backing out.

domiguy
Internet prick




Posts: 11037
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline my $300 against your $100.





You took 3-1 for 100.00


No, dear. what I said there was that I accepted DomKen's bet but he backed out. I never saw a proposed bet by DomiGuy, and wouldnt have taken anything less than 10:1. I'll even take him off ignore for that, assuming a third party holds it and we agree on definitions.




Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:02:34 PM)

Great wil

you look like a HUGE pussy now


Why am I not surprised?




rulemylife -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:04:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

Funny, I suppose.
Ex- cop, ex-MP, ex-sorta halfass occasional bounty hunter. If I decide to make a CA, it very likely will be made.


You do know that Andy made Gomer a part-time deputy too.

You're in stellar company.




rulemylife -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:09:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

That's because no explanation has been made. It may well be that no such explanantion is possible. They had a default judgment, and said the case was weak? Sorta like the defendant pled guilty and the DA said he didn't think he could convince a jury.
.


A default judgment is just what it says.

One party did not show up to contest the case.

It has nothing to do with the strengths or weaknesses of the case.




rulemylife -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:21:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

A few anonymous fliers turning up in Maryland is your evidence that all Republicans don't want any blacks to vote?

You're a loon.

We do however, have ample evidence that extremely powerful black Democrats in the Obama administration are turning a blind eye to the attempted intimidation of white voters by radical black militia members.

Got anything like that?



No he doesn't.

He has no idea the oppression the white man suffers in this country.

When will my people be free?




Sanity -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:24:35 PM)


How much oppression is enough? "Black Panther" Democrat douches intimidating little old ladies at polling places is enough for me, and the presidents attorney general standing behind them is over the top.




rulemylife -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:34:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


How much oppression is enough? "Black Panther" Democrat douches intimidating little old ladies at polling places is enough for me, and the presidents attorney general standing behind them is over the top.



I hear you brother Sanity.

When will the black oppressors finally allow the white man the freedoms that all humans are entitled to?




domiguy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:37:21 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I can't believe Wilbeur won't take the bet.

It smacks of cowardice.


I said Id take the bet. Its Kendoll thats backing out.

domiguy
Internet prick




Posts: 11037
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline my $300 against your $100.





You took 3-1 for 100.00


No, dear. what I said there was that I accepted DomKen's bet but he backed out. I never saw a proposed bet by DomiGuy, and wouldnt have taken anything less than 10:1. I'll even take him off ignore for that, assuming a third party holds it and we agree on definitions.


Wilbur is such an asshat. Throws out a bet with impossible stipulations to be met.....He knows no one is going to send a fellow CMer $1,000 bucks to hold and wilbur is fully aware of this fact, so wilbur can continue spewing his useless rhetoric and never be held accountable for his own words.

If he only thinks that there is a 10 -1 shot that Holder will be fired then why did he even bother mentioning that he thinks that Holder will be fired over these allegations? What a douchebag!!!

It goes to show how much of a cocksucker, liar and dishonest wilbur is, He continually spews out shit as if it holds merit and then when called onto the carpet he admits that there is only a minimal if any chance of what he thinks actually occurring.

I don't put him on block. I like to be reminded of how stupid people can be......Someone might want to quote this so the piece of shit can read it.





domiguy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 5:41:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


How much oppression is enough? "Black Panther" Democrat douches intimidating little old ladies at polling places is enough for me, and the presidents attorney general standing behind them is over the top.



I hear you brother Sanity.

When will the black oppressors finally allow the white man the freedoms that all humans are entitled to?



but for some reason Sanity and that piece of shit, wilbur, were not up in arms when the justice dept and J. Christian Adams chose not to pursue the case against the minutemen.

Only because they are centrists....lol.

hypocritical asshats. the lot of them.




jin99 -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:02:21 PM)

Riiiiiight, the Dept of Justice is so racist, whites are several times more likely to be convicted of a crime, arrested for minor drug use, and gets the death. Oh wait, it's the blacks who're disproportionately punished for the same crime.




Sanity -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:19:45 PM)


Heres a clue for the clueless - they call it the department of justice because those words are supposed to mean something. If the powers that be only protect certain people its not justice its a perversion. There is a reason lady justice is depicted as blindfolded,

[image]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hNaK5D_YZYk/R8axZThvPxI/AAAAAAAAA4E/dUEHMaf-gfg/s320/_LadyJustice.jpg[/image]


but again such ideals as that represents are so far over your head as to make this conversation pointless.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
I hear you brother Sanity.

When will the black oppressors finally allow the white man the freedoms that all humans are entitled to?





domiguy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:34:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Heres a clue for the clueless - they call it the department of justice because those words are supposed to mean something. If the powers that be only protect certain people its not justice its a perversion. There is a reason lady justice is depicted as blindfolded,

[image]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_hNaK5D_YZYk/R8axZThvPxI/AAAAAAAAA4E/dUEHMaf-gfg/s320/_LadyJustice.jpg[/image]


but again such ideals as that represents are so far over your head as to make this conversation pointless.


quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
I hear you brother Sanity.

When will the black oppressors finally allow the white man the freedoms that all humans are entitled to?




http://mediamatters.org/blog/201007010023

n May 15 testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Thomas Perez, assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, refuted the charge that the decision was a political one, testifying that the decision not to pursue charges amounted to "career people disagreeing with career people," which Perez said "happens very often."

To illustrate his point, Perez highlighted the Department of Justice's decision in 2006 not to pursue charges against members of the Minutemen for allegedly intimidating Hispanic voters in Pima, Arizona -- with one member of the group allegedly carrying a gun:

In another case, in Arizona, the complaint was received by a national civil rights organization regarding events in Pima, Arizona in the 2006 election when three well-known anti-immigrant advocates affiliated with the Minutemen, one of whom was carrying a gun, allegedly intimidated Latino voters at a polling place by approaching several persons, filming them, and advocating and printing voting materials in Spanish.

In that instance, the Department declined to bring any action for alleged voter intimidation, notwithstanding the requests of the complaining parties.


Where was Sanity then?....Wasn't so concerned about how blind justice was at that point in time.

political puppet. Complete hypocrite.




Jeffff -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 6:46:14 PM)

Here you go



quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

quote:

ORIGINAL: willbeurdaddy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I can't believe Wilbeur won't take the bet.

It smacks of cowardice.


I said Id take the bet. Its Kendoll thats backing out.

domiguy
Internet prick




Posts: 11037
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline my $300 against your $100.





You took 3-1 for 100.00


No, dear. what I said there was that I accepted DomKen's bet but he backed out. I never saw a proposed bet by DomiGuy, and wouldnt have taken anything less than 10:1. I'll even take him off ignore for that, assuming a third party holds it and we agree on definitions.


Wilbur is such an asshat. Throws out a bet with impossible stipulations to be met.....He knows no one is going to send a fellow CMer $1,000 bucks to hold and wilbur is fully aware of this fact, so wilbur can continue spewing his useless rhetoric and never be held accountable for his own words.

If he only thinks that there is a 10 -1 shot that Holder will be fired then why did he even bother mentioning that he thinks that Holder will be fired over these allegations? What a douchebag!!!

It goes to show how much of a cocksucker, liar and dishonest wilbur is, He continually spews out shit as if it holds merit and then when called onto the carpet he admits that there is only a minimal if any chance of what he thinks actually occurring.

I don't put him on block. I like to be reminded of how stupid people can be......Someone might want to quote this so the piece of shit can read i
t.






willbeurdaddy -> RE: Racial Bias At The Justice Department (7/7/2010 8:37:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

Great wil

you look like a HUGE pussy now


Why am I not surprised?


And you prove your reading comprehension is zero. Why am I not surprised?




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
2.734375E-02