Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: What would it take to actually secure the border with Mexico?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: What would it take to actually secure the border with Mexico? Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/28/2010 7:49:31 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

That because they don't grow good pot in the North duh.


Without a doubt that is the most ignorant thing I have ever heard in my life.


Then you must not read your own posts

You have obviously never sampled "california's finest"



(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 281
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/28/2010 8:16:16 PM   
xBullx


Posts: 4206
Joined: 10/8/2005
Status: offline
Ok, I've been ponderin' this and I think the only answer is to make Mexico the 51st state.

Beggin' the pardon of anyone who may have already mentioned this.

_____________________________

Live well,

Bull



I'm not an asshole; I'm simply resolute...

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It."

Caution: My humor is a bit skewed.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 282
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/28/2010 8:42:57 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

Ok, I've been ponderin' this and I think the only answer is to make Mexico the 51st state.

Beggin' the pardon of anyone who may have already mentioned this.


That was tried once and shot down in the congress because the bigots thought that that many non white people would "dilute" the purity of the "white race"

…it is without example or precedent, wither to hold Mexico as a province, or to incorporate her into our Union. No example of such a line of policy can be found. We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection—never of incorporating them into our Union. They have either been left as an independent people amongst us, or been driven into the forests.

I know further, sir, that we have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race—the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race. The greatest misfortunes of Spanish America are to be traced to the fatal error of placing these colored races on an equality with the white race. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of society. The Portuguese and ourselves have escaped—the Portuguese at least to some extent—and we are the only people on this continent which have made revolutions without being followed by anarchy. And yet it is professed and talked about to erect these Mexicans into a Territorial Government, and place them on an equality with the people of the United States. I protest utterly against such a project.

Sir, it is a remarkable fact, that in the whole history of man, as far as my knowledge extends, there is no instance whatever of any civilized colored races being found equal to the establishment of free popular government, although by far the largest portion of the human family is composed of these races. And even in the savage state we scarcely find them anywhere with such government, except it be our noble savages—for noble I will call them. They, for the most part, had free institutions, but they are easily sustained among a savage people. Are we to overlook this fact? Are we to associate with ourselves as equals, companions, and fellow-citizens, the Indians and mixed race of Mexico? Sir, I should consider such a thing as fatal to our institutions.


Ironically this can be found here

http://www.davidduke.com/general/john-c-calhoun-vetoes-annexation-of-mexico_948.html

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 7/28/2010 9:12:16 PM >

(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 283
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 1:41:48 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Cadenas, S. Korea doesn't have all those problems , they have minefields. Those are Totally effective.


Doesn't seem to be all that effective. South Korea had to cut Hanawon, their integration program for North Korean defectors because there were more than the program could handle. 2952 North Korean defectors arrived in South Korea in 2009.

Most apparently bypass the DMZ altogether and instead use the China-Laos-Thailand route. And that's even though the Chinese will return North Korean illegal immigrants (if they find them) back to North Korea, where they potentially face the death penalty.

Which goes to show that we have to fortify 20,000 miles of border and coastline, not just 2000 miles of land borders.


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 284
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 1:53:31 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

We have been through this, thompson. Its not that cut and dry and you know it. As Master said to me last night "prove to me you are a US citizen". Anyone could gain access to a birth certificate, SS card, marriage license, ect. Thats all it takes to have "proof" and the employer is in the clear without having to know or admit a thing.

You only hit one that is acceptable to verify that you are a US citizen for your I-9.  That's your social security card.  The birth certificate and marriage license won't do you any good.  The other form of ID has to be a picture ID issued by a local, state or federal agency.  A state ID card, Driver's License, or active Military or dependent ID card is supposed to be your primary identification when filling out your tax forms with your employer.  There's even a nice little box on the I-9 form that goes into "what if my name doesn't match the one on the social security card/what if I don't have a printed social security card?"  Before you are even permitted to work, it is the responsibility of the potential employee to take themselves to the Social Security office to request a new card.  In return, they receive a letter stamped by that office saying that their card is being mailed to them.  That letter can serve as a temporary verification that they are eligible to be employed in the US.


As far as I know, there is no such letter. Getting a replacement Social Security card can actually take months to do. For most people, it will be done in a matter of days. The problem is that Social Security workers don't have the expertise in immigration law. For instance, they sometimes falsely reject a Social Security application because the visa has expired (even though they should be looking at the I-94 instead. Would you have known that?)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
An immigrant/non US citizen is required to provied a Permanent Resident Card and Work permit number.


No. It's EITHER a Permanent Resident Card (aka Green Card), OR an Employment Authorization Card OR a foreign passport plus an I-94 authorizing employment, or one of a couple of other documents.


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 285
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 2:08:19 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
They came the same way as any other group... work visas that expired and they never went home. Makes me think the work visa program needs to be redesigned.


Visa overstays happen with all kinds of visas, tourist, student, and any kind of work visa (it's not "A work visa program" - there several dozen of them. The total number of non-immigrant visas is somewhere around 80 or so).

By the way, very often visa overstays are not the person's fault, but rather due to bureaucracy. Shortly after 9/11, INS tried to implement a zero-tolerance policy on overstays. That failed utterly because it turned out that the vast majority of overstays occurred because they themselves took too long to process cases. For instance, most tourists can stay for up to six months, and are allowed to request an extension by another six months. But it took them about nine months to process the request to an extension. To make matters worse, if you left the USA before the case was decided, INS would retroactively consider you an illegal immigrant! Talk about a catch-22.

But you are fundamentally right, the whole system needs to be redesigned. The way immigration law is designed is that most people who come to the USA to work are supposed to get Green Cards. That worked well until the 1980s, when it was possible to get a Green Card in less than 90 days. Since then, the immigration system had a major meltdown; we are now at ten years+ (my own, in the 1990s, took "only" eight years. As a high-level engineer).

That's why people started using temporary work visas more heavily, and that in turn lead to both a meltdown with these visas, and to overstays.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 286
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 2:12:42 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
Actually, illegal immigration from Canada is pretty substantial, too. I believe it is among the top ten countries of origin.

quote:

ORIGINAL: realwhiteknight
The amount of people coming in from the north illegally is marginal compared to the southern border. Anyone have numbers on this? I should research it later... How could it possibly not be? In Canada the infrastructure is nowhere near as terrible as it is in so many places in Mexico, so why *would* people be leaving there to come here? It doesn't make any sense. THAT is OBVIOUSLY why no one cares about protecting the border there as much- there's no problem with illegal immigration.

(in reply to realwhiteknight)
Profile   Post #: 287
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 4:54:16 AM   
cadenas


Posts: 517
Joined: 11/27/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Of course, there is one aspect that has not been addressed, the environmental impact of such a structure. The impact on local animals species would be considerable.


Actually, it has been addressed. Congress decided that the wall is exempt from most environmental regulations. Here in San Diego, they are planning to (or already did, I'm not sure) fill an environmentally sensitive canyon just to be able to build the fence.


(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 288
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 10:21:53 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: cadenas

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
Of course, there is one aspect that has not been addressed, the environmental impact of such a structure. The impact on local animals species would be considerable.


Actually, it has been addressed. Congress decided that the wall is exempt from most environmental regulations. Here in San Diego, they are planning to (or already did, I'm not sure) fill an environmentally sensitive canyon just to be able to build the fence.





Well, then it solves one problem.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 289
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 10:25:09 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cadenas
As far as I know, there is no such letter. Getting a replacement Social Security card can actually take months to do. For most people, it will be done in a matter of days. The problem is that Social Security workers don't have the expertise in immigration law. For instance, they sometimes falsely reject a Social Security application because the visa has expired (even though they should be looking at the I-94 instead. Would you have known that?)

My reply was to Tazzy specifically regarding United States citizens.  The original comment was about proving a person being a citizen.  The letter from the Social Security office absolutely can verify your eligibility to work in this country if you have a situation such as a name change due to marriage and your old Social Security card still has your prior name listed.  You can obtain the letter to show that you have applied for your new card so that the employer can hire you legally and permit you to work before actually receiving the new card in the mail.  You do have to actually visit the Social Security office to do so.  You can't use the online method for a verficiation of name change document.  I've done this personally, so I know it's a fact.

I've replaced My own Social Security card three times and those of My children once.  Twice due to name changes and once due to My wallet being stolen.  (Yes, they are right.  Don't carry those cards with you.  It's a bitch when you no longer have a picture ID and have to start from scratch.  I'm thankful to this day for the man who knew Me that worked at the DLB in Co Spgs at the time.)  The "months" you refer to are when there are problems with documentation, but usually, it's two to three weeks.

A rejected social security number will generate a "no match" letter sent to the employer by the SSA.  That can be something as simple as a key stroke error.

A United States citizen should have no reason to ever deal with an I-94 when it comes to verfifying their right to work within this country.  It's specifically used for non citizens who are applying for work here.  (By "apply" I am meaning apply for a position with an employer.)  Without whom, many of this country's citizens wouldn't have to go through half of this.


Edited as I did not mean to confuse the term "apply".  I'm actually meaning applying for a particular position as in walking in with a job application.


< Message edited by LadyPact -- 7/29/2010 10:28:33 AM >


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 290
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 10:26:50 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cadenas

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
Cadenas, S. Korea doesn't have all those problems , they have minefields. Those are Totally effective.


Doesn't seem to be all that effective. South Korea had to cut Hanawon, their integration program for North Korean defectors because there were more than the program could handle. 2952 North Korean defectors arrived in South Korea in 2009.

Most apparently bypass the DMZ altogether and instead use the China-Laos-Thailand route. And that's even though the Chinese will return North Korean illegal immigrants (if they find them) back to North Korea, where they potentially face the death penalty.

Which goes to show that we have to fortify 20,000 miles of border and coastline, not just 2000 miles of land borders.




Well gee Cadenas, when they're caught just deport them like they're *supposed* to be doing.
Thompson is right, we should be going after anyone who hires them. And not just "fines" but Prison sentances, someone does 3-5 years in a federal pen, gets out and is a convicted felon, can't get bonded, business liscences, insurances, loses their home and property and ends up bagging groceries for $12 bucks an hour for the rest of their lives, hated by their friends and neighbors, do you think they're going to do it again?

< Message edited by popeye1250 -- 7/29/2010 10:32:11 AM >


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to cadenas)
Profile   Post #: 291
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 3:07:24 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
There was a topic dealing with prison time for someone hiring illegals from the Phillipines

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 292
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 3:16:04 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Popeye are you okay? They do deport them when they are caught....the issue is thhat there are just too damm many of them here for these deporttions to make any impact on their numbers.....Isn't that why you are constantly obsessing on the issue?
How did you manage to miss Cadenas main point ? That your propoesed wall....your fantasy strip of land mines....would still fall short of stopping the entry of illegals.....unless you are willing to mine the shore lines too.
Of course that just might piss off all of those surfer dudes.....Can't you just imagine the new lyrics that can be sung to old Beach Boys hits?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 293
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 3:19:33 PM   
xBullx


Posts: 4206
Joined: 10/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

Ok, I've been ponderin' this and I think the only answer is to make Mexico the 51st state.

Beggin' the pardon of anyone who may have already mentioned this.


That was tried once and shot down in the congress because the bigots thought that that many non white people would "dilute" the purity of the "white race"

…it is without example or precedent, wither to hold Mexico as a province, or to incorporate her into our Union. No example of such a line of policy can be found. We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection—never of incorporating them into our Union. They have either been left as an independent people amongst us, or been driven into the forests.

I know further, sir, that we have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race—the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race. The greatest misfortunes of Spanish America are to be traced to the fatal error of placing these colored races on an equality with the white race. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of society. The Portuguese and ourselves have escaped—the Portuguese at least to some extent—and we are the only people on this continent which have made revolutions without being followed by anarchy. And yet it is professed and talked about to erect these Mexicans into a Territorial Government, and place them on an equality with the people of the United States. I protest utterly against such a project.

Sir, it is a remarkable fact, that in the whole history of man, as far as my knowledge extends, there is no instance whatever of any civilized colored races being found equal to the establishment of free popular government, although by far the largest portion of the human family is composed of these races. And even in the savage state we scarcely find them anywhere with such government, except it be our noble savages—for noble I will call them. They, for the most part, had free institutions, but they are easily sustained among a savage people. Are we to overlook this fact? Are we to associate with ourselves as equals, companions, and fellow-citizens, the Indians and mixed race of Mexico? Sir, I should consider such a thing as fatal to our institutions.


Ironically this can be found here

http://www.davidduke.com/general/john-c-calhoun-vetoes-annexation-of-mexico_948.html



These insecure, self righteous dicks drive me crazy, I suspect they only allow us useless German/Mic/Catholic types in on the white skin technicality then.....

Fuck David Duke, just for your knowledge, I support anyone coming here that does it legally, and thereby wants to contribute to the common good.



_____________________________

Live well,

Bull



I'm not an asshole; I'm simply resolute...

"A Republic, If You Can Keep It."

Caution: My humor is a bit skewed.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 294
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 4:22:32 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
quote:

(CBS) The number of illegal immigrants in the U.S. has dropped by nearly 1 million, renewing the debate over what to do with those still in the country, according to a Los Angeles Times report Thursday.

The Department of Homeland Security reported that illegal immigrant population dropped to 10.8 million in 2009 compared to 11.6 million in 2008. It was the second consecutive annual decline and the largest in at least three decades.

"This represents a sharp break from the past, when pretty much the illegal population has continually grown," Steven Camarota, of the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington, D.C., think-tank that favors immigration restrictions, told the paper. "It shows illegal immigration is not inexorable."


Number of Illegal Immigrants Plunges by 1M

And the best guess is that 1400 illegals enter the US each day, many of them along the southern border.

According to one report, in 2005, 57% of illegal immigrants were from Mexico; 24% were from other Latin American countries, primarily from Central America; 9% were from Asia; 6% were from Europe; and 4% were from the rest of the world.

Illegal immigration to the United States

That is the only information that seems to be unbiased. One website has illegal immigrants at 20,000,000 while another has it less than 10 million.

My personal opinion is that it is somewhere in the middle.

There are a large number of illegals hiring 'coyotes' to get them across the border and most border crossings occur in metropolitan areas, where they can easily assimilate into the population.

There are groups who try to cross the desert in California, Arizona and New Mexico as well as wade across the Rio Grand river, which makes the whole problem of securing the border a complicated one at best.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 295
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/29/2010 4:27:21 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: xBullx

Ok, I've been ponderin' this and I think the only answer is to make Mexico the 51st state.

Beggin' the pardon of anyone who may have already mentioned this.


That was tried once and shot down in the congress because the bigots thought that that many non white people would "dilute" the purity of the "white race"

…it is without example or precedent, wither to hold Mexico as a province, or to incorporate her into our Union. No example of such a line of policy can be found. We have conquered many of the neighboring tribes of Indians, but we have never thought of holding them in subjection—never of incorporating them into our Union. They have either been left as an independent people amongst us, or been driven into the forests.

I know further, sir, that we have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race—the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race. The greatest misfortunes of Spanish America are to be traced to the fatal error of placing these colored races on an equality with the white race. That error destroyed the social arrangement which formed the basis of society. The Portuguese and ourselves have escaped—the Portuguese at least to some extent—and we are the only people on this continent which have made revolutions without being followed by anarchy. And yet it is professed and talked about to erect these Mexicans into a Territorial Government, and place them on an equality with the people of the United States. I protest utterly against such a project.

Sir, it is a remarkable fact, that in the whole history of man, as far as my knowledge extends, there is no instance whatever of any civilized colored races being found equal to the establishment of free popular government, although by far the largest portion of the human family is composed of these races. And even in the savage state we scarcely find them anywhere with such government, except it be our noble savages—for noble I will call them. They, for the most part, had free institutions, but they are easily sustained among a savage people. Are we to overlook this fact? Are we to associate with ourselves as equals, companions, and fellow-citizens, the Indians and mixed race of Mexico? Sir, I should consider such a thing as fatal to our institutions.


Ironically this can be found here

http://www.davidduke.com/general/john-c-calhoun-vetoes-annexation-of-mexico_948.html



These insecure, self righteous dicks drive me crazy, I suspect they only allow us useless German/Mic/Catholic types in on the white skin technicality then.....

Fuck David Duke, just for your knowledge, I support anyone coming here that does it legally, and thereby wants to contribute to the common good.


I have posted numerous times that I am not in favor of illegal immigration.
I have also pointed out that with the limited resources of the authorities the easiest and least expensive way to stop it is to sanction the employers.
Tazzy posted up that if one employes someone who has illegally entered the country that the penality is quite draconian. Something on the order of $250,000 and/or 5 years in the federal pen for each illegal hired.
Please note we are not talking about someone who hires someone, in good faith, with what appears to be proper documentation but those who after having been notified by the s/s that the paperwork is suspect do not take the proper measures to remediate the problem.





(in reply to xBullx)
Profile   Post #: 296
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/30/2010 12:02:41 PM   
Yourscum


Posts: 57
Joined: 6/29/2010
Status: offline
I imagine those things you mentioned would stop illegal immigration from mexico, but no one will ever go for land mined areas and the like. I think a more practical solution would be to actually enforce our laws about hiring undocumented workers. In my college job I worked with several illegal aliens, meanwhile watching american citizens applying for the job and not getting them. It was not great. Also, we need to change our citizenship laws. Currently if someone is born on US soil, they are american, regardless of their parents nationality. So all a mexican woman, or any other illegal immigrant, has to do is give birth to a child on our soil and the child gets citizenship status. And lets face it, when aren't mexican gals pregnant? It should be changed so that at least one parent must be a citizen of the US. In my opinion at least.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 297
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/30/2010 12:08:50 PM   
E3


Posts: 47
Joined: 4/10/2005
Status: offline
Or prehaps, let anchor babies gain citizenship AFTER (and if) the parent obtains it, but the anchor baby does expedite the parents chance of gaining citizenship (not automatic.  Doesnt american citizenship require criteria be met, etc?).

(in reply to Yourscum)
Profile   Post #: 298
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/30/2010 12:09:08 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Yourscum

I imagine those things you mentioned would stop illegal immigration from mexico, but no one will ever go for land mined areas and the like. I think a more practical solution would be to actually enforce our laws about hiring undocumented workers. In my college job I worked with several illegal aliens, meanwhile watching american citizens applying for the job and not getting them. It was not great. Also, we need to change our citizenship laws. Currently if someone is born on US soil, they are american, regardless of their parents nationality. So all a mexican woman, or any other illegal immigrant, has to do is give birth to a child on our soil and the child gets citizenship status. And lets face it, when aren't mexican gals pregnant? It should be changed so that at least one parent must be a citizen of the US. In my opinion at least.


"Noone will ever go for landmines?"
Ah,....they've gone for landmines for the last 57 years or so in S. Korea!
Those are OUR landmines!

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Yourscum)
Profile   Post #: 299
RE: What would it take to actually secure the border wi... - 7/30/2010 12:13:42 PM   
Yourscum


Posts: 57
Joined: 6/29/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250




"Noone will ever go for landmines?"
Ah,....they've gone for landmines for the last 57 years or so in S. Korea!
Those are OUR landmines!


But we're talking about American soil. Somehow I don't see people going for it. I'm not saying it wouldn't work, or that it doesn't have a certain merit, but realistically can you imagine the US doing that? After all the US likes to pretend its a moral country, while simultaneously committing genocides and invading other sovereign countries. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.


< Message edited by Yourscum -- 7/30/2010 12:14:51 PM >

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: What would it take to actually secure the border with Mexico? Page: <<   < prev  13 14 [15] 16 17   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.148