Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: The need to be rude?!?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: The need to be rude?!? Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:30:03 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
If you have ever seen men angry about being treated as walking wallets by women who want to use them for their money but don't actually care about them or want them for anything else, you will have had a look at the other side of this particular social equation. 

How many people seriously feel that a man should never become angry or annoyed at women who do this, or that a man should never feel bad or frustrated after being treated this way?

_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:31:49 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
This is part of what is wrong with the experiment.  It doesn't allow the full situation to create the experience of a female with an active profile.  One issue is, you are missing the overwhelming influx of messages when a person is on the "new user" list.  (Which is the situation of the OP being here less than two months.)  Second, it is a completely vanilla profile, which means it will not come up in any kink search that anybody does.  Third, it already has a history of people who have been blocked by the original user (being LNT).  It's not going to be the same as someone who creates a new profile, which is going to change the way people react to incoming mail on this site.

_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:34:01 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

If you have ever seen men angry about being treated as walking wallets by women who want to use them for their money but don't actually care about them or want them for anything else, you will have had a look at the other side of this particular social equation.

Yeah I've had that that's why it's not solely a female issue but I reacted differently. I didn't run from it.

You just got done saying I was dense if I couldn't see why it was solely a female issue now your telling me that if I've had "this happens to me" then I should know.

Oh and for the record..Men get used for sex as well but you'll rarely hear us bitching about it because we don't think our dicks are made of gold..steel maybe but not gold.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:35:39 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

This is part of what is wrong with the experiment.  It doesn't allow the full situation to create the experience of a female with an active profile.  One issue is, you are missing the overwhelming influx of messages when a person is on the "new user" list.  (Which is the situation of the OP being here less than two months.)  Second, it is a completely vanilla profile, which means it will not come up in any kink search that anybody does.  Third, it already has a history of people who have been blocked by the original user (being LNT).  It's not going to be the same as someone who creates a new profile, which is going to change the way people react to incoming mail on this site.

How about you create a completely new profile and give the password to the whole forum so we can monitor it. You of course will be the only one who replies to them.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:41:35 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

Telemarketers, scammers and anyone who solicits anything (sexual or otherwise) for personal gain while ignoring someone socially are not engaged in a two-way dialogue.

Where did telemarketers come into this? Oh about the time you decided to use the most extreme example to gain leverage in a debate because your positions was less than logical.


Your failure to grasp the logic is not really my problem, but let me explain it again.

Forget for a moment what the solicitor in the equation is soliciting for.  Focus on the simple fact that one person is actively soliciting the other for something that they want while completely ignoring or disregarding all of that person's communications and expressed wishes.  The person being solicited may initially be quite friendly and social, but their social existence is never acknowledged.  The sole focus of the solicitor's communication is on getting what they want, even when what they want is totally contrary to what the person being solicited has just clearly communicated.

This is an accurate analysis of the communication dynamics of either a telemarketer call or one of the most common types of solicitation that a "seeking friends only" female profile will receive on CollarMe. 




_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:45:05 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys
How about you create a completely new profile and give the password to the whole forum so we can monitor it. You of course will be the only one who replies to them.


Unfortunately, I don't think I'm able to do that.  I'd have to double check TOS, but unless I'm mistaken, it's forbidden to share a password.  Here's what I can do.  I can create a new profile, with the exact same kink interests that I list on Mine.  In doing so, I can copy/paste every message that is sent to it, with the names removed, and forward the messages to you.  I'll happily include times and dates, but not names.  I will also provide information on any pic that is sent via the email.

In return, I get you as a man of your word that you will not report the profile for spam.  That any direct copying of the messages will not be published on the message board.  Rough content, fine.  Volume, fine.  Also, I remain in complete control of any reporting for vulgar text and photos as I see fit.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:45:30 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
This is part of what is wrong with the experiment.  It doesn't allow the full situation to create the experience of a female with an active profile.  One issue is, you are missing the overwhelming influx of messages when a person is on the "new user" list.  (Which is the situation of the OP being here less than two months.)  Second, it is a completely vanilla profile, which means it will not come up in any kink search that anybody does.  Third, it already has a history of people who have been blocked by the original user (being LNT).  It's not going to be the same as someone who creates a new profile, which is going to change the way people react to incoming mail on this site.


All true.  This isn't really what you could call a particularly meaningful experiment in terms of gathering data, and the profile is to some extent pre-filtered because I made it almost entirely vanilla and listed no kink interests at all.  So theoretically I should not be getting much if any really icky mail...except that I think I will anyway, no matter how well it's filtered. 


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 12:54:42 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

Unfortunately, I don't think I'm able to do that. I'd have to double check TOS, but unless I'm mistaken, it's forbidden to share a password. Here's what I can do. I can create a new profile, with the exact same kink interests that I list on Mine. In doing so, I can copy/paste every message that is sent to it, with the names removed, and forward the messages to you. I'll happily include times and dates, but not names. I will also provide information on any pic that is sent via the email.

In return, I get you as a man of your word that you will not report the profile for spam. That any direct copying of the messages will not be published on the message board. Rough content, fine. Volume, fine. Also, I remain in complete control of any reporting for vulgar text and photos as I see fit.

Agreed with one add-on. Make that one Dominate female profile and one submissive profile. If you feel uneasy about the submissive profile ethically then maybe someone like sunshinemiss or )Damn I can't think of the blond headed girls name that posts often) wouldn't mind doing it. The one that made a comment about all the negativity lately.

I'll need to see your response as well if you answer them back but you have my word.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 1:13:09 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
I had a guy about a month ago that I was talking to. He lived in Canada and because of where I want to move..I decided to start a conversation with him..Thought he was pretty cool and everything seemed kosher..I made a remark about on of his pictures about how nice it was because it was a lake surrounded by woods..He then said " Yeah and it's secluded, you can have all types of fun there"..something along those lines...What I wasn't aware of at the time because I hadn't panned down below the message was that he had sent a picture of a female in a canoe spread wider than a canyon. Did I mention to him that it wasn't cool and it was unsolicited..Yep sure did...Did I get upset...No.

He said to me that you have to expect it almost because this was kinky dating site. I do and don't agree with him to a point.
I personally wouldn't mind for various reasons if they gave more options for mail control. It really wouldn't be that hard to add those either.


< Message edited by Icarys -- 10/8/2010 1:14:45 PM >


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 1:13:33 PM   
LadyNTrainer


Posts: 1584
Joined: 5/20/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys
You said earlier that I was taking something personal..How could you tell that?


Because you seem to be the only person on this end of the thread who actually has their panties in a wad about anything that's going on here.


_____________________________

Your dominant Personal Trainer for fitness and body shaping in the lifestyle. Let my fetish be your motivation.

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 1:15:37 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

Because you seem to be the only person on this end of the thread who actually has their panties in a wad about anything that's going on here.

No your trying to make it personal but I go commando.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to LadyNTrainer)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 3:16:25 PM   
CaringandReal


Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

Out of curiosity, why do you seem to have a problem with how other people feel and where they set their personal boundaries?

What I guess I have a problem with is someone whining from my point of view or people that in my mind are supposed to be of strong minds letting things like that get to them..



It's logical to think of it as small potatos. But since when are emotions logical?

This intense male hatred and angry repsonses are not a little thing at all if you have a long history of rape, attempted rape, or non-bdsm abuse at the hands of men. The rude sexual responses to a complete stranger, the insane (the ones I get are so extreme that I think the writers are insane) angry retorts and insults and hatemail when she says "no" or "go away please," the repeated attempts to "get" to her, by making new profiles from which you write detailed rants, the creepy stalking that goes on, particularly when a guy finds out something about your past and tries to threaten you/out you with it, tend to remind one of the bad old days when all of this was expressed physically. The more you reveal about yourself, the more honest you are, the more you get treated with hatred, it seems. The guys that I think of as dom in desire only see the profile, think that just because they read it that you belong to them already, and act accordingly, including outraged when you aren't attracted to what they are and refuse to pander to that delusion. If you have a personal photo up, the hate mail increases by a tenfold, which is why I now display a tree instead of me--when I display me at all.

Sometimes men get this treatment, too. I have a male dom friend who hides his charming and brilliant profile because it consistently attracts a very creepy sort of female sub who becomes obsessed by him and cyber stalks him (this type contacts all of his "friends" to try to dig out details about him, tries to determine from casual things he says where he lives and works, and so on; one of them pumped me for information once in a very dishonest flattering way--it was extremely creepy). I don't think men are subject to this sort of behavior nearly as frequently as women though because they never write on their profiles on in message posts complaining about it. They complain about the scammers instead. Back to my friend. He's not hear to pick up subs, he's got his hands full in that area, but he likes to make friends and have entertaining discussions. The chicks who tend to write him are intellectual, but in a bad way, usually, their intellects have made their persoanlities skewed.

It's very werid. This is the only personals site where I experience this sort of thing. Atl.com is fine. The men who write are mostly casual and just want to have sex with me. Big deal, it's a swinger's place and that is to be expected there. But a few are real gems. :) OkCupid, which contains a lot of stealth pervs, is more than fine. I enjoy that place a lot. They have good "outlets" and "busywork" for obsessives that keep them too busy for their normal stalkerish behaviors. ;) Maybe once in a blue moon I'll get some angry ranter, usually just a random drive-by shooting having nothing to do with me. Here, when my profile is on, I get 3-5 per week. 3-5 angry emails, and more frequently they come in even before I've said a single word to them. They just pick something out of my long profile (sometimes the fact that is is long, sometimes the fact that I don't have a photo up) and go ballistic on me. I've gotten long emails from total strangers scolding me and accusing me of being an arrogant stuck-up twit for having a long profile. I think I have a long profile because I am trying to communicate, as accurately as I can, what I am, the bare minimum I need to be happily enslaved, and also give an idea of the huge amount of stuff I don't need but that many consider essential. I'm not trying to show off, I'm writing in my natural style, but a certain sort of anti-intellectual always assumes I'm trying one-up him with my words.

I do have problems with male anger. My childhood was full of it and I've never gotten over the intimdation and fear of men due to it. I am very timid, even after all these years, as a result. So the toxic environment here can be very hard to deal with. My feelings get hurt...a lot and I start to blame myself and wonder what i am doing wrong to cause all these men to hate me.

...

And then I read a thread like this and it's an enormous relief because I realize I'm not the only one to whom this happens and maybe I am not so awful and despicable after all. As I said earlier in this thread, I absorb, like a sponge, anything that comes at me. I have very few emotional defenses. They would have been counterproductive to have in my last relationship, and I think they will be counterproductive in a future one, so, since they've been so thoroughly rooted out of me, I maintain the weeding: I do not allow them to take root. So I try to set up other kinds of defenses. Some days I'm so weary of the mail and fearful of what will be in it that I'll delete everything on my screen that is unread because I cannot face what might be in them. :( That's my best defense it seems: if I don't read it, it can't hurt me. I know very well I could be throwing out the very rare wonderful contact email that way, but sometimes I'm just too weary/shocked by it all to care. I also am very careful to read the profile first before opening an email. Sometimes I can guess by what the profile says that this person enjoys randomly spewing hatred and has descided that women on here are The Enemy, but not always.

Collarme, I'm sure, has its male dom gems too. I very occasionally see a profile that is so good it floors me. But that's another bizarre thing about this place: it's often the men with perfectly fine profiles who write the most hateful things in their first emails. This makes me very wary of writing any profiles I like for fear, not of rejection--I don't see imcompatibility as rejection--but of hate being poured at me because I had the gall to write them.

_____________________________

"A friend who bleeds is better" --placebo

"How seldom we recognize the sound when the bolt of our fate slides home." --thomas harris

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 3:33:24 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
That's a lot to respond to and since I'm a man of fewer words I'll just say this. I've read your profile and what I get from that is someone who is doing her best to hold up defenses as you've said and "may be doing a much better job at it" than she thinks..so much so that it's working against you. You've also eluded to that..Which is why I don't understand how you would continue doing those things.

I've always thought that you close yourself off way too much to do any good for you or a possible mate. "People that are stuck behind brick walls slowly starve to death."

Here recently it seems like your down on men and maybe think the other side holds better options..Which isn't true...Good people aren't gender specific. Just saying.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 3:53:08 PM   
WyldHrt


Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

The nice nice approach doesn't work with everyone. Truthfully I've tried that to a much greater degree a while back but that was getting nasty responses so with certain people..I use a different tactic..especially when I see bullshit like she said.

Sooooo, it's ok for you to make belittling, snarkily aggressive posts after receiving 'nasty responses' to being 'nice nice'; but it's not ok for women to stop being nice or simply not respond after getting similar treatment from the men who jump nasty when politely rejected.
Pot, meet kettle.

Edited to keep me from getting modspanked.

< Message edited by WyldHrt -- 10/8/2010 4:02:56 PM >


_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 4:15:58 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
Well, I guess I'm a man of more words than Icarys, so I'll throw out two observations here

1) Whatever we're doing on this site- doesn't seem to be working real well if this thread is any indication. There's just way too much anger. From a male perspective, being regarded as a potential stalker makes me think about going elsewhere- or at least nosing around some other places more. From my own perspective- I'm not a stalker and I don't like being treated as one- even potentially. My default assumption is that the human beings I come into contact with are reasonable individuals until they prove otherwise. If I regard them with suspicion, that just leads to a downward spiral. I think I've heard the female perspective- that there are creeps out there and the safest way not to run into them is to not reply to anything.

2) Humans often act in a manner which is counterproductive- occasionally because to do otherwise would be counterintuitive. What's been happening on this site is a great example of this downward spiral.

Examples of counterintuitive behavior- your children are probably safer with strangers than with the people they know. There are maybe 100-200 stranger kidnappings/yr- family abuse and child molestation is orders of magnitude higher. Yet we are taught to fear strangers...

People take their car because they're afraid of public transport- but buses, trains, and commercial aircraft are far safer statistically than your own car.

We think we can spot liars- but everything lies or is lunch. Being able to lie successfully is a survival trait-most humans can lie successfully. Cops are better at spotting liars- but worse at spotting people telling the truth. Overall, their accuracy is worse than a non-law enforcement professional.

To the relevant example- women on this site think that by not responding to polite emails, they will be safer from nasty responses. In actuality, by discouraging reasonable men, the individuals who are left are the ones responsible for the unpleasant behavior. Furthermore, by tarring all men with the brush of potential stalkers or their ilk, reasonable individuals are disheartened and go elsewhere. By remaining cowed into not responding to profiles, the aggressive men who do not seek a real time interaction with a woman feel victorious and empowered and continue their behavior. What's worse- the idea that by reading a profile, a woman could spot a potential stalker/nasty person. Clearly, this doesn't work- many of the nasty folks have learned to camouflage themselves well enough so that they don't stand out in a crowd. For the same reason that you cannot look at a group of individuals and identify the murderer by visual inspection, you cannot identify all the nasty folks on the basis of their profile. Failing to answer polite emails merely defeats the primary purpose of this site, i.e. to meet like minded individuals. (Message boards alone will not keep this site viable.)

A somewhat troubled and disheartened Sam

(in reply to Icarys)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 4:48:54 PM   
Icarys


Posts: 5757
Status: offline
quote:

Sooooo, it's ok for you to make belittling, snarkily aggressive posts after receiving 'nasty responses' to being 'nice nice'; but it's not ok for women to stop being nice or simply not respond after getting similar treatment from the men who jump nasty when politely rejected.
Pot, meet kettle.

Don't talk to me about Pots and Kettles when your cookware yourself.
Have I ever said it was okay? As a matter of fact I've said the opposite...the difference being that I know that it's wrong and that I'm giving people what I and others get while others are choosing to tuck tail and run.

I realize the futility in things but I don't always do them for the same reasons.


_____________________________

submission - the feeling of patient, submissive humbleness - the state of being submissive or compliant; meekness.

Alaska Bound-The Official Countdown Has Started!
http://tinyurl.com/872mcu3
http://alturl.com/mog7m

(in reply to WyldHrt)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 5:23:07 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

From a male perspective, being regarded as a potential stalker makes me think about going elsewhere- or at least nosing around some other places more. From my own perspective- I'm not a stalker and I don't like being treated as one- even potentially. My default assumption is that the human beings I come into contact with are reasonable individuals until they prove otherwise.


Sam,

I honestly think that misses a fundamental point.  I do believe that most women divide the male sex as a whole into pretty distinct groups in a particular way that men don't when they consider women.  I have the sense that they divide them, roughly, into three.  The first group is 'non-creepy guy on my level' - someone they can talk to.  The second is 'possibly creepy, possibly not, but doesn't connect'  These write the one-liners, get too sexual too early, and don't read profiles.  The third is 'creepy, could be nasty to an unknown degree'.  These are the ones who show signs of aggression.  Women - I think - have a distinctly different policy for each of these groups.  That's been my experience, anyway.   

I'd be surprised if your cmails regularly were to get slotted into women's second or third category.  But it'll happen occasionally because mistakes get made and for a tonne of reasons to do with the recipients' former experiences. . . . 

How often have you actually been made to feel like a stalker, so far, may I ask?




_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 6:53:11 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
1) Whatever we're doing on this site- doesn't seem to be working real well if this thread is any indication. There's just way too much anger.

The only thing that has had any negative reaction from Me has been the fact that you don't listen.  Several women have tried to tell you what the email experience is like here.  It's taken nine pages of this thread (and by the way, this isn't the only thread on the subject) to convince you that a) we get way more email than most males b) some of that email deserves no response and c) the fact that you don't write rude emails doesn't mean you deserve a response.  I'd love to know just how many women have to say the same thing before it gets through.

2) Humans often act in a manner which is counterproductive- occasionally because to do otherwise would be counterintuitive. What's been happening on this site is a great example of this downward spiral.

Actually, My method is pretty effective.  That includes the number of people that I delete and block their emails.  I did it before I move here from GA (including many folks from CA at that time) and I'm not running short on new people that I meet on a very regular basis.  

To the relevant example- women on this site think that by not responding to polite emails, they will be safer from nasty responses.

No, that isn't what we said.  What we've said is, in some cases, a polite first email doesn't mean that person is a good person to correspond with.  Many men here think that, just because they get a response, that we want to continue.  I had one guy who thought I was "not a good mentor for him" when I had said nothing of the sort.  These are the kinds of leaps that males on this site make.  That any woman who responds to an email (any email) wants to continue conversing with them.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 7:03:57 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct
To the relevant example- women on this site think that by not responding to polite emails, they will be safer from nasty responses.


Sam, you don't get it. It isn't that I think, but am wrong in my perception. I really am safer from getting nasty responses by not responding.

I've shared with you some of the nasty responses I have gotten from sending a "thanks but no thanks". I have never gotten a nasty response from not responding.

However, I do agree that it's a shame this is the way it is. The Man sent me a one liner when I was new on another site, saying he'd read my profile and thought we had some stuff in common. I read his profile and responded with a question, a two liner. We went from there. Today, hell even two months after being online, I would not have responded. I would have missed the finest man I've ever known. But had I adopted a policy of not responding instead of rejecting people, I would also have missed the threat to cut me in two.

Moreover, we decide which risks we are comfortable with and which we aren't, and what the price to pay for each is. Buses are safer than cars but less convenient which also plays into our choice. But arguing that we shouldn't feel the way we do isn't helping your cause. You're telling us that we don't have the right to feel the way we do. And you don't have the right to tell us how to feel.


_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: The need to be rude?!? - 10/8/2010 7:13:45 PM   
LadyHibiscus


Posts: 27124
Joined: 8/15/2005
From: Island Of Misfit Toys
Status: offline
Peon, your categories are really pretty accurate! I never quantified it in that way before, but yeah, men I talk to, men I ignore, and men I block.

LP, hats off to you for trying. I think it's a lost cause.

For what it's worth, I talk to a lot of decent men on the other side. Because *I* wrote to them. If I see a nice picture, I drop him a line to say so. I comment on journals and profiles, too. None of those men is a match for me as far as dating goes, but so what? (My home page is set to Michigan men, 35-55)

I get lots of compliments, too, from all over, and every one gets a "thank you". Since I took off the sexy pics, I get much less of the icky mai, and much less scattershot spam. that's all good. I resurrected an old profile, for a change of pace, and bam! The mailbox was full in spite of there being no picture. Who was viewi ng me? Allllll kinds of guys who were "owned and collared".

Interesting place, collarme. I've made what I hope are lifetime friends here, and acquired one enemy. The rest...

_____________________________

[page 23 girl]



(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Submissive >> RE: The need to be rude?!? Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047