Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balanced"


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balanced" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/18/2010 7:55:07 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

yeah, i didnt think anyone would address that. There were over 300 slaves at Vernon at the time of Washinton's death. He freed them in his will... upon the death of his wife.

Why do i bring this up? Sitting Bull was a native american.
True.  He was Lakota Sioux.


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

It was His country.
I'm not so sure this was true.

What was the purpose of the Obama book?  What kind of "heroes" is the book suppose to represent?

Firm



He is indigenous to the continent. How can you be "not so sure"?


Was he an American citizen?

Canadians and Mexicans are "indigenous to the continent".  This doesn't make them American citizens.

Second, was the book about "American heroes" in some respect?  If so, while I can appreciate Sitting Bull's fight for his way of life, his fight doesn't make him an "American hero", especially as he was fighting against the US government.

Some other points, that that's enough for now.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/18/2010 8:32:16 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Born here, which makes him an american citizen.

ETA

At the time of the battle, Sitting Bull was too old to lead a battle. Crazy Horse did the honors.

I also see you dont mention the confederate soldiers who also fought against the US government.

The list of the 13 Americans Obama has in his book are as follows...


President Obama pays tribute to these 13 Americans:

Painter Georgia O'Keeffe (creative)

Albert Einstein (smart)

Jackie Robinson (brave)

Sitting Bull ("a healer")

Singer Billie Holiday ("you have your own song")

Helen Keller (strong)

Vietnam Memorial architect Maya Lin (it's important to "honor others' sacrifices")

Social worker Jane Addams (kind)

Martin Luther King Jr. ("you don't give up")

Astronaut Neil Armstrong (explorer)

Farmworkers leader Cesar Chavez (inspiring)

Abraham Lincoln ("part of a family")

George Washington ("proud to be an American")



Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/thingstodo/kids/articles/2010/11/16/20101116obama-kids-book-thee-i-sing-letter-daughters-children.html#ixzz15hVKkvQG

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 11/18/2010 8:50:28 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/18/2010 9:01:31 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
If Obama walked on water, Fox would write a headline reading something like "Obama Desecrates Christ's Works".

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/18/2010 9:08:55 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
LOL

now that i do believe, thorny!

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/18/2010 9:11:13 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
~FR

Btw, anyone who thinks this book was a bad idea, do you know what happens to the royalties?


His royalties are to go to a scholarship fund for children of soldiers killed or disabled.

Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/thingstodo/kids/articles/2010/11/16/20101116obama-kids-book-thee-i-sing-letter-daughters-children.html#ixzz15had7bVi

How DARE Obama!!!

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/18/2010 10:40:12 PM   
Brain


Posts: 3792
Joined: 2/14/2007
Status: offline

Someone need to monitor the krud they brainwash people with or they will get away with their lies.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

So don't watch it.


(in reply to FatDomDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 3:13:54 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Was he an American citizen?

14th amendment ratified in 1868, Battle of Little Bighorn was in 1876. Therefore at the time Custer illegally attacked him and his relatives he was a US citizen.

quote:

Second, was the book about "American heroes" in some respect?  If so, while I can appreciate Sitting Bull's fight for his way of life, his fight doesn't make him an "American hero", especially as he was fighting against the US government.

Wait a second there, aren't you one of the ones complaining so loudly that resisting government tyrrany, or at least claimed tyrrany, is a noble thing? Sitting Bull was simply resisting the tyrrany of the government. His people had numerous valid treaties giving them the Black Hills but the Grant administration ordered them removed to open the area up for gold mining.

What about their property rights? They legally owned their territory, again based on those valid treaties, and the US government simply took the land without recompense and gave it to others.

What about the rights of free association, freedom of religion and travel? They were forced onto reservations against their will and prevented from maintaining contact with their neighbors and friends. Sitting Bull was murdered by US government employees to prevent him from participating in a religious festivity.

Seems to me the Lakota and Sitting Bull deserve to honored.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 6:39:47 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Born here, which makes him an american citizen.

Not necessarily true (despite DK's post):

Indian Citizenship Act of 1924

The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, also known as the Snyder Act, was proposed by Representative Homer P. Snyder (R) of New York and granted full U.S. citizenship to America's indigenous peoples, called "Indians" in this Act. (The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to persons born in the U.S., but only if "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"; this latter clause excludes certain indigenous peoples.) The act was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge on June 2, 1924.

...

The Act granted citizenship to about 125,000 of 300,000 indigenous people in the United States (Those indigenous people that were not included in citizenship numbers had already become citizens by other means; entering the armed forces, giving up tribal affiliations, and assimilating into mainstream American life were ways this was done (Peterson 121). Citizenship was granted in a piecemeal fashion before the Act, which was the first more inclusive method of granting Native American citizenship. The Act did not include citizens born before the effective date of the 1924 act, or outside of the United States as an indigenous person, however, and it wasn’t until the Nationality Act of 1940 that all born on U.S. soil were citizens (Haas 16, Haney 29).

So, I do not know if Sitting Bull had met any of the earlier requirements for American citizenship, although it is possible.

So, I still have the question: was he even an American citizen?

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I also see you dont mention the confederate soldiers who also fought against the US government.

The list of the 13 Americans Obama has in his book are as follows...


President Obama pays tribute to these 13 Americans:

Painter Georgia O'Keeffe (creative)

Albert Einstein (smart)

Jackie Robinson (brave)

Sitting Bull ("a healer")

Singer Billie Holiday ("you have your own song")

Helen Keller (strong)

Vietnam Memorial architect Maya Lin (it's important to "honor others' sacrifices")

Social worker Jane Addams (kind)

Martin Luther King Jr. ("you don't give up")

Astronaut Neil Armstrong (explorer)

Farmworkers leader Cesar Chavez (inspiring)

Abraham Lincoln ("part of a family")

George Washington ("proud to be an American")

I don't see any "confederate soldiers who also fought against the US government"  in the list.

Don't misunderstand.  I really don't care one way or the other about the book, or even the controversy. I simply asked a couple of questions.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 6:49:52 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, also known as the Snyder Act, was proposed by Representative Homer P. Snyder (R) of New York and granted full U.S. citizenship to America's indigenous peoples, called "Indians" in this Act. (The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to persons born in the U.S., but only if "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"; this latter clause excludes certain indigenous peoples.) The act was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge on June 2, 1924.


The part excluding indigenous people didnt come about until the SC ruling in 1884, Elk vs Wilkins.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:12:32 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, also known as the Snyder Act, was proposed by Representative Homer P. Snyder (R) of New York and granted full U.S. citizenship to America's indigenous peoples, called "Indians" in this Act. (The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship to persons born in the U.S., but only if "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"; this latter clause excludes certain indigenous peoples.) The act was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge on June 2, 1924.


The part excluding indigenous people didnt come about until the SC ruling in 1884, Elk vs Wilkins.

Still doesn't answer the question of whether or not SB was an American citizen.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:30:23 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

So, I do not know if Sitting Bull had met any of the earlier requirements for American citizenship, although it is possible.

So, I still have the question: was he even an American citizen?



Uhhhhhh..........what difference does it make?

His people were obviously here before there ever was a United States.

So what point are you trying to make?

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:31:18 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
what would?? Im asking out of curiosity


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:38:09 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

what would?? Im asking out of curiosity

What would what?  Prove that he was an American citizen?

I suspect that someone has answered the question, in scholarly research.  So far, all we have, and all I've found is a tangled history of citizenship rules and programs for native Americans, but nothing that says this specific man was ever an American citizen.

Some people have claimed he is, so the burden is on them to prove it.  I have simply said that I'm unsure that he was an American citizen, and so far, no one has provided anything that gives a preponderance of proof that he likely was.

Firm

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:43:17 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

So, I do not know if Sitting Bull had met any of the earlier requirements for American citizenship, although it is possible.

So, I still have the question: was he even an American citizen?


Uhhhhhh..........what difference does it make?

His people were obviously here before there ever was a United States.

So what point are you trying to make?

That if he wasn't an American citizen, then a book of "American Heroes" shouldn't necessarily include him.

I haven't read the book, but it could be covered as to the justification within it's pages.

I have no dispute that native Americans were treated shabbily at best, and even that - from one prospective - SB was a "heroic figure".

I even think Fox is pretty much over the line in the way and manner that they broached the subject.

But the question of whether he really belongs in the pantheon of "American Heroes" is a valid one, I think.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:45:03 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Now your playing semantics... lol

The 14th admendment stated anyone who was born here was a citizen... still states that. Some wanted the exclusion to native americans. That exclusion did not exist until after the battle. Until that court decision he was an american citizen by law.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 7:48:16 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

what would?? Im asking out of curiosity

What would what?  Prove that he was an American citizen?

I suspect that someone has answered the question, in scholarly research.  So far, all we have, and all I've found is a tangled history of citizenship rules and programs for native Americans, but nothing that says this specific man was ever an American citizen.

Some people have claimed he is, so the burden is on them to prove it.  I have simply said that I'm unsure that he was an American citizen, and so far, no one has provided anything that gives a preponderance of proof that he likely was.

Firm


And I'll ask again, what difference does it make?

You seem to be trying to make the argument that the U.S. government needed to legitimatize him when his people were here long before the United States ever existed.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 8:01:27 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
yeah Ill put him down as more American than any immigrant or their progeny
The book isnt entitled  American Citizen Heroes
just American Heroes...
and he isnt anything else but american.
LOL semantics, always with the "catchy outie" semantics
I think Obama is allowed his opinion still isnt he?
Im sure Custers family are furious





_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 8:06:52 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Now your playing semantics... lol

The 14th admendment stated anyone who was born here was a citizen... still states that. Some wanted the exclusion to native americans. That exclusion did not exist until after the battle. Until that court decision he was an american citizen by law.

Sometimes law is semantics.

If you accept one law that says he might have been a citizen, then why won't you accept another law that says he wasn't?

What did he think he was?  Did he ever acknowledge "his" citizenship?

In regards to the 14th amendment and Elk v Wilkins that you mentioned:

In Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884), the clause's meaning was tested regarding whether birth in the United States automatically extended national citizenship. The Supreme Court held that Native Americans who voluntarily quit their tribes did not automatically gain national citizenship.

The clause's meaning was tested again in the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark 169 U.S. 649 (1898).

These suits still did not settle the question, as it took the 1924 Indian Citizenship Law to clarify some of the court rulings, and Congressional intent.

Time line:

Sitting Bull was born in 1831.

The 14th amendment was in 1868.

The Little Big Horn was in 1876.

Elk v Wilkins was in 1884.

Sitting Bull died in 1890.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark was in 1898.

Indian Citizenship Law was in 1924.

Some native Americans were citizens throughout the entire time.  Some were not.

Was the specific native American "Sitting Bull" an American citizen at any time?

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 8:10:36 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

yeah Ill put him down as more American than any immigrant or their progeny
The book isnt entitled  American Citizen Heroes
just American Heroes...
and he isnt anything else but american.
LOL semantics, always with the "catchy outie" semantics
I think Obama is allowed his opinion still isnt he?
Im sure Custers family are furious

So ... the birth of an ancestor at any physical location makes all the descendants of such an individual part of the current society and government?

I've got ancestors from Wales, England, Virginia, Germany, Poland, France and several other current nations.  And more, I'm sure.

Why do I not get to vote in those nations or states?

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 11/19/2010 8:31:47 AM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balan... - 11/19/2010 8:13:54 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
You havent invaded them.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: You have to love FOX, they are "fair and balanced" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.770