tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle While we are on the subject some one might like to explain to me what the US gets from its massive subsidisation of Israel. I keep asking this question and no one ever offers an answer. This silence is even more surprising when one considers that the total cost (direct subsidy + indirect costs) of US support for Israel has been estimated at US $ 3 TRILLION.* I really would like an answer if there is one. So, I am sure, would many American taxpayers * http://www.ifamericansknew.org/stats/stauffer.html The figure of three trillion is utter utter utter bullshit. [...] The exact reasons for US support of Israel are complex, and its pointless discussing them as a good deal of supposition is involved. However, its clear the US in part gives a good deal of aid to Israel in order to maintain its influence over the country As usual Anax's post contains far too many wild claims and inaccuracies to respond to. So I shall deal with just a few of the more obvious ones. The $3 trillion figure is an estimate of direct costs - aid, subsidies, discounts and the like - and indirect costs. Indirect costs include such things as lost investment and trading opportunities. If this figure is disputed, people are quite free to offer an alternative figure (with credible sources please!) which they may feel more accurate but sadly this is not done. The figure is explained in detail and referenced at the link. Unless someone produces a more accurate one, it stands as the only credible one. To dismiss the $3 trillion figure, without any analysis or supporting evidence as "utter utter utter bullshit" is itself utter utter utter bullshit. Stauffer also estimates the number of American jobs lost due to this largesse for Israel. He estimates that the recurring annual cost to the American economy is 275, 000 jobs. With its current unemployment in the US at over 10%, those jobs are dearly needed in the US. If the reason for US financial support is " to maintain its influence over [Israel]" as Anax argues, then whatever the actual amount, it is a total waste. Money straight down the drain. Recently, Obama offered the Israelis a US $3 billion bribe to stop expanding the colonies/settlements temporarily so that peace talks could take place. The offer was contemptuously rejected and Israel successfully scuttled the peace talks. Not much use having a proxy army if it doesn't do as it's told is it? So much for influence ...... Obviously, a threat to withdraw all support would have forced the Israelis to see sense. In fact, such a threat could force the Israelis to the negotiating table and to conclude a meaningful peace treaty. It is difficult to see Israel surviving in the style it is accustomed to without Uncle Sam's support. Of course, none of these figures includes a price for loss of influence elsewhere in the world, the cost of diplomatic protection for a terrorist State or a cost for the anti-Americanism this misguided support for Israel inspires. How can anyone avoid the conclusion the US is being ripped off wholesale by its 'partner', being taken for the mother of all rides? Edited to add extra truth!
< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 2/26/2011 11:06:05 PM >
_____________________________
|