RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


pahunkboy -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 11:07:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charnegui

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

we do not have titles in the US.   None.   

No, your aristocracy is based on wealth, political influence and fame instead.

In wich "old money" is the nearest you have to aristocracy. Something like the Kennedy's.
I'd like to know how these families are influencing American politics and society.....

What is irritating me, is the media making DSK look guilty, before he's stands trial.


Actually, I'm a limey as well.
I just get a bit fed of hunky's constant: "we don't have a class system, all Americans are equal" blather. He's a nice guy, and it's rather touching that he's willing to believe that in the face of a lot of evidence to the contrary, but it's not a very convincing claim outside of a Horatio Alger novel. If anything, the American class system is even more entrenched and inflexible than ours is, which is no mean feat. It's just based on money, influence and notoriety rather than somebody's father having a seat in the House of Lords.


We have a Constitution.   You don't.




Moonhead -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 1:12:15 PM)

As a matter of fact, we do.
(Wiki's description, for all the fucking good it'll do.)





calamitysandra -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 1:13:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

We have a Constitution.   You don't.



But we have a Grundgesetz.




FullCircle -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 1:24:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
The whole thing kinda makes me proud to be an American, where we evidently believe more in equal justice than in Europe.

Sez the man with the system that invented plea bargaining.

No plea bargaining regarding the sentencing here.




Charnegui -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 1:41:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: calamitysandra

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

We have a Constitution.   You don't.



But we have a Grundgesetz.



We are not the United States of Europe, that's why we don't have a constitution.
But we do have a Convenant

In which not all states have agreed I must say. Or at least.. The dutch people didnt agree with it, but with some sneeky ways... our government did sign it.




Phoenixpower -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 1:52:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: calamitysandra

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

We have a Constitution.   You don't.



But we have a Grundgesetz.



Actually during my studies in the UK our law tutor mentioned the fact that the UK doesn't grant within their law their citizens certain rights unlike other countries do....such as Germany [:)] in their Grundgesetz [:)]

That was a nice invitation from him for another verbal headbutting between some uni mates and me [:D]

...amongst other situations as some lessons caused quite an outcry when they learned the legal responsibility starts at the age of 14 in Germany...not age of 10 as it is in England.

this newspaper article actually shows a bit the difference of that respect within Europe:

quote:

from: http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics-news/2009/01/07/age-of-criminal-responsibility-could-be-raised-from-eight-to-12-86908-21021838/

Age of criminal responsibility could be raised from eight to 12
Jan 7 2009 By Magnus Gardham

MINISTERS are considering raising the age of criminal responsibility from eight to 12, it emerged yesterday.

The move would mean primary school pupils could no longer face prosecution if they broke the law.

Scotland is under pressure from the United Nations to raise the age.

The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child want all countries to stop prosecuting children younger than 14.

Last year, Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini told MSPs that eight was too young for a child to be taken before the criminal courts. No final decision has been taken on the move, government sources said yesterday.

A spokesman said: "Ministers have made clear our commitment to the UNCRC and to promoting and supporting the rights of all children in Scotland.

"As the cabinet secretaries for education and justice confirmed to MSPs in November, we are considering this issue.

"Together with the views of stakeholders, these will help inform our thinking on any changes to legislation."

It is understood 12 is being considered as a new age of criminal responsibility.

Labour said they would look at proposals on lowering the age "constructively".

Scotland has one of the lowest ages of criminal responsibility in Europe.

In England - where ministers are also under pressure to make a change - it is 10.

The age is 13 in France, 14 in Germany and Italy, 15 in Denmark and 16 in Spain.

However, figures show nearly 5000 crimes are committed by eight-to 11-year-olds in Scotland each year.

And last year, 130 kids under the age of eight, including a number of three-year-old vandals, were recorded for committing crimes.





pahunkboy -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 7:09:29 PM)

quote:

Grundgesetz
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

As a matter of fact, we do.
(Wiki's description, for all the fucking good it'll do.)




All men are not created equal over there-  unlike in the US where all men are created equal- and it is documented by our constitution.




WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 7:33:47 PM)

So true in the UK and Europe babies are created specifically to occupy different tiers in society. At the bottom of soiciety are simple labor volk happy but too stupid to be otherwise.

[image]http://aristi.net/DYOS/Products/MOVCOM012/Steptoe2.jpg[/image]




willbeurdaddy -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/27/2011 7:36:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

So true in the UK and Europe babies are created specifically to occupy different tiers in society. At the bottom of soiciety are simple labor volk happy but too stupid to be otherwise.




Not too stupid to use a computer, as evidenced by the UK participants on this board!




Moonhead -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 5:27:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

Grundgesetz
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

As a matter of fact, we do.
(Wiki's description, for all the fucking good it'll do.)




All men are not created equal over there-  unlike in the US where all men are created equal- and it is documented by our constitution.


I hate to have to be the one to tell you this, but they're not created equal in your country, either. Sorry.




Aylee -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 6:09:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

The whole thing kinda makes me proud to be an American, where we evidently believe more in equal justice than in Europe.

Pity we don't seem to believe that people are innocent until proven guilty anymore.

K.


That is not what presumption of innocence means.

It means that a jury has not yet been persuaded of DSK's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, so he cannot lawfully be punished. It does NOT mean that the rest of us, inside or outside the legal system, are required to pretend that the he's completely innocent of any crime whatsoever, and that the charges against him are false or fabricated.

In fact, he's already been arraigned. In other words, the legal system has made a preliminary determination that it's NOT terribly likely that DSK is an innocent victim of circumstance. Or put another way, if any significant percentage of the people sitting in Rikers for months on end awaiting trial are, in reality, completely and totally innocent of any crime whatsoever, there's something really, really wrong with our legal system.





WantsOfTheFlesh -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 6:32:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
The whole thing kinda makes me proud to be an American, where we evidently believe more in equal justice than in Europe.

Pity we don't seem to believe that people are innocent until proven guilty anymore.

K.


That is not what presumption of innocence means.

It means that a jury has not yet been persuaded of DSK's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, so he cannot lawfully be punished. It does NOT mean that the rest of us, inside or outside the legal system, are required to pretend that the he's completely innocent of any crime whatsoever, and that the charges against him are false or fabricated.

In fact, he's already been arraigned. In other words, the legal system has made a preliminary determination that it's NOT terribly likely that DSK is an innocent victim of circumstance. Or put another way, if any significant percentage of the people sitting in Rikers for months on end awaiting trial are, in reality, completely and totally innocent of any crime whatsoever, there's something really, really wrong with our legal system.

Interesting points but not sure I completely agree with that. In the eyes of the law rather than personal opinion someone must be either guilty or innocent. There can't be any grey area or centre ground of probable guilt but there was insufficient evidence to prove it. Thought arraignment just set formal proceedings in place cept in exceptional circumstance.




Aylee -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 7:01:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WantsOfTheFlesh

Interesting points but not sure I completely agree with that. In the eyes of the law rather than personal opinion someone must be either guilty or innocent. There can't be any grey area or centre ground of probable guilt but there was insufficient evidence to prove it. Thought arraignment just set formal proceedings in place cept in exceptional circumstance.


No.

He has been accused. He has been informed of the accusation. Steps have been taken to make sure that he shows up for the trial to determine innocence or guilt.

Presumption of innocence means that "The Law" does not just shoot him outright.

You should really look up the terms 'arraignment' and 'trial'.




FullCircle -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 8:02:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
He first denies the sex at all and then says she wanted it. Tell me how the previous sentence is any different from your run of the mill rapist?

At first he was trying to save his reputation and career and now he is trying to retain his freedom. I don't find it that odd that people initially will admit to nothing (especially people in high ranking positions) and then they slowly change their story.

This change of story doesn't really prove guilt, it only proves that he was trying the handle to whole matter another way (deny it to the media and secretly pay her off). It would be just as wrong for people not aware of the actual evidence to present the picture that she knew he was wealthy, had sex with him, tried to extort money from him before going into hiding.

There will not be many facts in this case it'll come down to how convincing they both are in what they say or perhaps what other independent witnesses, that dealt with the immediate aftermath, say.




pahunkboy -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 9:51:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

Grundgesetz
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

As a matter of fact, we do.
(Wiki's description, for all the fucking good it'll do.)




All men are not created equal over there-  unlike in the US where all men are created equal- and it is documented by our constitution.


I hate to have to be the one to tell you this, but they're not created equal in your country, either. Sorry.


We have no titles here.  All men are created equal.    The Constitution trumps all other laws.




FullCircle -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 10:00:41 AM)

Firstly: they aren't created, unless you think some random sperm meeting some random egg is the act of creation? Let me get a few random nuts and bolts, I'll throw them into a bucket and see if a supercomputer comes out.

Secondly: They aren't at any stage equal, if they were equal everyone would have the same haircut and nobody would face persecution because of it.

In terms of the wider question as to if you believe the potential exists for anyone to succeed: yes it does.




Moonhead -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 10:03:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle
In terms of the wider question as to if you believe the potential exists for anyone to succeed: yes it does.

I'd question that, to be honest. Plenty of people are damned by their circumstances.




FullCircle -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 10:08:34 AM)

There are the few exceptions where people from a challenging background create a much better life for themselves but in the majority of cases you'd be right to be pessimistic because working backwards from outcomes you only have opportunities, education and background.




hlen5 -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 10:15:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FullCircle

quote:

ORIGINAL: hlen5
He first denies the sex at all and then says she wanted it. Tell me how the previous sentence is any different from your run of the mill rapist?

At first he was trying to save his reputation and career and now he is trying to retain his freedom. I don't find it that odd that people initially will admit to nothing (especially people in high ranking positions) and then they slowly change their story.

This change of story doesn't really prove guilt, it only proves that he was trying the handle to whole matter another way (deny it to the media and secretly pay her off). It would be just as wrong for people not aware of the actual evidence to present the picture that she knew he was wealthy, had sex with him, tried to extort money from him before going into hiding.

There will not be many facts in this case it'll come down to how convincing they both are in what they say or perhaps what other independent witnesses, that dealt with the immediate aftermath, say.



I admit I tend to take the victim's side in such cases. I'm admit there's a possibility he could have been set up.

There have been allegations against him in the past. Where there's smoke there's fire, usually.

I have a question for those who are offended by his "perp walk" (If there's anyone reading the boards that was offended). Would any rape suspect in France have been subjected to a perp walk, or was it just because he's powerful that it was so offensive?




FullCircle -> RE: A question for Europeans about DSK. (5/28/2011 10:21:28 AM)

I'm not really offended by that so I can't answer. If people think someone in handcuffs and unshaven looks guilty of anything but being processed by the authorities then that has implications for who you can still find out there with an open mind to sit on the jury but that's about all.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125