RE: Question for For submissive females!! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity



Message


aromanholiday -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 5:17:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

I believe the profile itself, which has become the focus of this thread, is fairly irrelevant, but I suppose it wouldn't hurt to pay some attention to it. If you really are writing nice emails to submissives that attempt to get to know them, chances are your lack of success is, in part, the bitches' faults, not yours.


I want to highlight that phrase yet again....

quote:

the bitches' faults


So, because we dont fall head over heels for your first, second, 24th attempt to get a woman, then we are "bitches"?

And you wonder why these men are having no success?




[8|] Could it be you are a tad bit confused? I don't lick twat unless my master orders me to.


quote:


I can assure you no one will forget your nastiness.


If this is what you call nastiness, I am honored.

Obviously you weren't reading carefully the first time, but I'll throw to you the same question that I threw to sexyred, because I'm seriously interested in the answer. I was speaking about a general group of people, not all people, quite obviously, and the remarks certainly weren't addressed at you, they were to the OP. Why then did you, personally, identify yourself with that group? (I won't ask why you mistook me for a man; I think the answer to that is quite clear.)




sexyred1 -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 5:21:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday


quote:

ORIGINAL: sexyred1

Well, that was fun.


Glad you enjoyed yourself. [:)]

Sometimes a good portion of the submissive population does need a good bashing. I'm not quite sure why you identified yourself with that group, however. (frown)

I have seen the things I'm speaking of. I spend time "over there." There's lots of interesting things to observe.


What group do you think I am identifying with? The smart submissive group who deserves a good bashing?

Are you the designated basher of the submissive population, and if so, why? Who hurt you? Poor baby.

You spent time "over there". Where? Uranus?

Edited to add: I thought you were a dude, aromanholiday. Now I see the light.....it is all clear now, thanks.




angelikaJ -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 5:28:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: aromanholiday

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

I believe the profile itself, which has become the focus of this thread, is fairly irrelevant, but I suppose it wouldn't hurt to pay some attention to it. If you really are writing nice emails to submissives that attempt to get to know them, chances are your lack of success is, in part, the bitches' faults, not yours.


I want to highlight that phrase yet again....

quote:

the bitches' faults


So, because we dont fall head over heels for your first, second, 24th attempt to get a woman, then we are "bitches"?

And you wonder why these men are having no success?




[8|] Could it be you are a tad bit confused? I don't lick twat unless my master orders me to.


quote:


I can assure you no one will forget your nastiness.


If this is what you call nastiness, I am honored.

Obviously you weren't reading carefully the first time, but I'll throw to you the same question that I threw to sexyred, because I'm seriously interested in the answer. I was speaking about a general group of people, not all people, quite obviously, and the remarks certainly weren't addressed at you, they were to the OP. Why then did you, personally, identify yourself with that group? (I won't ask why you mistook me for a man; I think the answer to that is quite clear.)


The problem when you speak in generalities is it is rather undefined.
quote:


To address your actual question, a lot of submissive women with ads on Collarme look for any reason or excuse to reject a man who writes them. The majority do this, I personally believe, because they are giddy on the power trip of all these male dominants supplicating them for attention and trying to catch their eye. They love the feeling of rejecting somebody: it makes them feel powerful and special and far more attractive than the probably are in real life. Nowhere in real life does a woman get the quantity of flattering attention that she gets on an online dating site. All that flattery all too frequently goes to a submissive woman's head and she forgets that she's actually on here to find a man to control her. No matter how well-written your email is, a good majority of these women will find a way to reject it because of this intense inflation of ego that's going on. They'll nitpick it until they find one tiny thing: a misspelled word (the guy must be an illiterate idiot), an approach that was too aggressive, that wasn't aggressive enough, that was just right but he didn't mention my favorite fetish right off the bat so we must not be compatible, etc. ad nauseum.


Had you used the word some instead of a lot, I would not have taken offence.
A lot has very different implications; is a much wider sampling.

But I am kind of curious, I never thought of you as a male poster, but (and this is not a hostile question, I am just trying to understand), how is it that you have experience knowing how submissive females respond on the other side?




sexyred1 -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 5:37:34 PM)

I am making an assumption here....that she feels justified in bashing the sub female population because she used to do the same things she is bashing.

That is..until she met her now current Master, and now she has seen the light.

So she was doing the sub female population a public service in a very nasty and roundabout way instead of being upfront and saying, hey ladies, I was ignoring all these guys who wrote me until I found my needle in a haystack, so don't ignore all the wanking emails you get, since you too, might find your bliss.

Is that about right, aromanholiday? Because, you know, I would not want to make an assumption.




tazzygirl -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 6:55:32 PM)

quote:

Why then did you, personally, identify yourself with that group? (I won't ask why you mistook me for a man; I think the answer to that is quite clear.)


Second question first...your profile is hidden and your name lends no clue. You post like a man.

Never heard of snark, have you. You were speaking about a general group of people. We are all part of the CM group. I am part of the female group on CM. A smaller subset would be the submissive group on CM.

Since you never specified what "group", and your post was aimed at women.... take a guess sweetheart.




LanceHughes -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 6:59:54 PM)

tazzy: get back on topic.

all you girls: sheath the claws.

Regards, Lance, member VAA's possee




tazzygirl -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 7:00:48 PM)

Why you snapping at me? I was answering a question




LanceHughes -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 7:12:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze
<snipped>

Oh and a guy who quotes from this trashy website (TheFeminineWoman) but doesn't even have the balls to admit he did a copy and paste job... Classy...
<snipped>


 
And from his "Journal" where he cut-n-pasted from the site above, we have:
quote:


Women are the MOST vulnerable. As a result, they have to use masks more than anything. This is where we get bitches who push and shove and have no qualms about destroying their sisters and upsetting them. A result of using these masks to cover up our natural feminine essence is that women become indifferent and emotionless, blunt and nasty.

Emphasis added.  That is, he didn't even modify it one iota.
I had seen that typo<?> when I first read "his" journal, but figured the guy was loony.  Thanks, LadyC, for pointing ou that he had copied it full-cloth.     




ILustAfterPeon -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 7:12:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

Damnit. I *know* that a certain woman, a long time ago, told me that she had both a pair of black gloves, and a pair of red gloves. Now who *was* that woman?
Nods. She told you many many things.

You make me laugh, and when I find out who you are, you can say goodbye to your ribs, because I'm going to hug you to death.
Are you saying that if I exposed myself to you, there will be guaranteed fondling? [:D]






Lockit -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 7:22:38 PM)

This place is funny, in a scary kind of way. [:D]

*shakes head, shrugs, laughs and keeps on reading... * [8|]




LanceHughes -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 7:23:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Why you snapping at me? I was answering a question

tazzy, when I saw "RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11" in your signature block, I had hope that your habit of dragging most threads down into a "he-said, she-said" mode had died.
 
I "snapped" at you because you ARE off topic.  See my post above to see how to stay ON topic.

Please stop with the "questions" about who meant what to whom by which post.
 
PLEASE learn to use the quote feature more regularly.  The reason I say this is that I can ONLY assume that YOUR post <quoted at the top of this one> was directed to me.
 
Some of the recent posters might easily have thought you meant them.
   
Now, back to our regularly scheduled thread which is about the new user Douche, his first and (still) only post, and his weird profile and what might be wrong with his approach.
 
ETA: <hopefully before tazzy "calls" me on it>  Don't worry, folks, I'll figure how the "gloves for Peon" fits in.... give me a few.    




LanceHughes -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 7:34:38 PM)

Let's see.... ILustForPeon is one of them-there 99 year old Female submissives.  Her latest post has a question for Peon.  Maybe if he replies with a question, we're "covered" under the thread name of "Question for For submissive females!!"  Probably have to get rid of those double exclamation marks though since that's a big clue as to douche's style. LOL!
 
CLUE: Purple text!

ETA: Didn't notice this typo "Question for For submissive females!!"  until I cut-n-pasted it above.  :::sigh:::




tazzygirl -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 9:14:59 PM)

quote:

tazzy, when I saw "RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11" in your signature block, I had hope that your habit of dragging most threads down into a "he-said, she-said" mode had died.


First, my demon child was my dog who we recently had to put down.

Second, you dont like my posting style, feel free to ignore me. But dont even start believing you have the authority to tell me what to do.

quote:

I "snapped" at you because you ARE off topic. See my post above to see how to stay ON topic.


Your opinion doesnt mean squat to me. Again, you are free to ignore me.

quote:

Please stop with the "questions" about who meant what to whom by which post.


Please stop assuming you have any right to tell me how to post anywhere.

quote:

PLEASE learn to use the quote feature more regularly. The reason I say this is that I can ONLY assume that YOUR post <quoted at the top of this one> was directed to me.


Since, in the bottom corner of my reply was your name, I did assume you were smart enough to realize that post was directed specifically at you. Otherwise, it would have started with ~FR

quote:

Some of the recent posters might easily have thought you meant them.


And if they had asked, I would have made it quite clear who I was posting too. I posted correctly. Just because it wasnt how you wanted me to post... again... doesnt mean squat.

Why dont you worry about your posts and leave me to mine. [:D]





LanceHughes -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 10:27:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

tazzy, when I saw "RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11" in your signature block, I had hope that your habit of dragging most threads down into a "he-said, she-said" mode had died.

First, my demon child was my dog who we recently had to put down.
<snipped>

Sorry to hear of the death of your dog.  Putting a pet down is always difficult. 




tazzygirl -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 10:39:49 PM)

18 years old. Long haired black lab. Looked meaner than a rattle snake and wouldn't hurt a kitten. Had to rescue him once from a toddler who was pulling the hair out of his balls.

He is so missed.




Awareness -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (5/31/2011 11:59:55 PM)

  You're weak and your profile makes that clear.  There's nothing else to say.




DeviantlyD -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (6/1/2011 12:06:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

  You're weak and your profile makes that clear.  There's nothing else to say.



I'm not saying I support douchebagfirefox's point of view, but what's your point in making a personal insult here, 24 hours later?




Awareness -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (6/1/2011 12:32:56 AM)

   I'm telling him the truth.  Nothing more, nothing less.

Or did you miss the memo about submissive women being attracted to strength.




DeviantlyD -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (6/1/2011 12:58:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

   I'm telling him the truth.  Nothing more, nothing less.

Or did you miss the memo about submissive women being attracted to strength.


You're telling him your opinion. Opinions are not always truths.




Awareness -> RE: Question for For submissive females!! (6/1/2011 1:11:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD
You're telling him your opinion. Opinions are not always truths.
   Correct.  I'm telling him my truth.  And it's going to be a hell of a lot more useful to him than anything else he's reading in this thread.

We've got those who are just mocking him, those who are giving him advice, those who are entertaining themselves at his expense.  LaTigresse probably came close to the most useful response, but she's not really in a position to deliver it well and she really has no basis for some of her conclusions.

The root of his problem is his weakness.  His insecurity, neediness and reactionary personality all derive from this fundamental flaw.  Without addressing this, any activity will simply be wallpapering over a rotting framework.




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875