RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


VaguelyCurious -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:42:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

No i didnt change the question. The question is still the same. They ran an ad that wasnt fully upfront about what they were seeking... a bilingual can mean english and french... or dutch and german. Someone who has knowledge of acohol turns into a bartender, which again is not in the ad.

You added a load of hypotheticals after the question.

They ran an ad that was upfront - you had the option of ringing up in advance and asking if they meant bilingual in any direction, or if there was a specific requirement (because bilingual on its own sounds a bit odd.) That's certainly what I would have done, and what I'd do with any similarly vague requirements.

If this theoretical you didn't do that, then you haven't researched the job properly. That's your failure, not theirs.




tazzygirl -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:43:55 PM)

Care to guess how many companies state not to call them about the job offering? But, its cool, you have your mind made up.

Enjoy the lol debate!




VaguelyCurious -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:45:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Since your reply was to me, yes.


Umm, it wasn't. I'm not sure how you figured it was. It was a very general piss-take of the topic, I wasn't directing it at anyone.


Ah, I thought you were being funny, Sugar. I'm kind of sad now. That would have been a good joke.

If you post using the box at the bottom of the screen then it lists your post as being in reply to the one before it when you started typing. (Look at the little 'in reply to' brackets on the right of the post.)

Etiquette says that if you're responding in general then you put 'FR' (meaning 'fast response') at the start of the post.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:47:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Care to guess how many companies state not to call them about the job offering?

If they're so heavily subscribed that they won't chat to you then you're firing into the dark anyway, and all the listed requirements in the world won't make a difference.

But it's cool, we clearly define discrimination differently.




Arpig -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:47:24 PM)

Awww, what's the matter? Did you run out of ideas as to how to move the goal posts again, can't figure out a way of pretending you didn't say what you said in order to avoid actually answering what a respondent wrote?

I'm disappointed, you can usually drag these sort of  shenanigans out for 6 or 7 pages,





CreepyStalker -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:53:14 PM)

quote:


They ran an ad that w
quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreepyStalker

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Since your reply was to me, yes.


Umm, it wasn't. I'm not sure how you figured it was. It was a very general piss-take of the topic, I wasn't directing it at anyone.


Ah, I thought you were being funny, Sugar. I'm kind of sad now. That would have been a good joke.

If you post using the box at the bottom of the screen then it lists your post as being in reply to the one before it when you started typing. (Look at the little 'in reply to' brackets on the right of the post.)

Etiquette says that if you're responding in general then you put 'FR' (meaning 'fast response') at the start of the post.



Sorry to disappoint. Just pretend I was being intentionally hilarious, yeah?

I've never noticed the bracketed thing before, that makes more sense now. Although your system is ridiculous. If it's aimed at someone, that someone gets quoted, if not it's obviously a general comment. Simples.




tazzygirl -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 5:58:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

Awww, what's the matter? Did you run out of ideas as to how to move the goal posts again, can't figure out a way of pretending you didn't say what you said in order to avoid actually answering what a respondent wrote?

I'm disappointed, you can usually drag these sort of  shenanigans out for 6 or 7 pages,




Come on! surely you cant be done! Im just your latest target. Have at it... the floor is all yours.

Does this make you feel like a big man?




gungadin09 -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 6:14:31 PM)

They should have said it was a job requirement, but, no, i don't think it's discrimination. i also think that Spanish should be required curriculum in certain states, but that's another thread.

ETA: i just read the clarification. No, i don't think that listing bilingualism (or any other skill that the employer feels is necessary for the job) is discrimination. i guess the exception would be advertising for skills that are clearly illegal (breaking and entering) or advertising for skills that really indicate a preference based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc. (disqualifying an applicant for wearing a burka, for example). i do NOT think that bilingualism falls into that category.

pam




LinnaeaBorealis -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 6:17:33 PM)

If I were looking for a job today, I would of necessity brush up on my Spanish. I also used to speak French, but I think for the most part, when they say "bilingual" without specifying which languages in this country, it usually means English & Spanish. I agree with those who have said that it's a skill set, a requirement of that particular job, like typing a certain number of words per minute.




gungadin09 -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 6:39:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Would anyone consider is discrimination if an ad stated someone to be bilingual, and the other language they are seeking is never specified until you go to the interview?


Certainly not. i would consider it stupidity, but not discrimination. Around here, i would also probably assume that "bilingual" mean bilingual English-Spanish, unless it were otherwise specified.

pam




gungadin09 -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 6:55:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig
Get it straight, there is NO official language in the U.S... You are from Washington state, which not only does not have an official language, it passed a English Plus resolution back in 89. So you are completely wrong and have absolutely no basis on which to base a claim of discrimination on the State or Federal level.


If she were in a state that did officially declare English as it's language, would that make it any more discriminatory to hire only bilingual employees?

pam




mummyman321 -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 7:33:40 PM)

To the OP
I have to say the USA is way behind the times in schooling. Most foreign countries require a 2nd language for children in school. The economy today is no longer a national economy. Its a global economy. If you want to be in business, stay in business, and compete in business you better have people in your company that speaks multiple languages.

Up to 5 years ago I only spoke English. Now I know a little German, and picking up Spanish and Portuguese. I do not think I will ever get the hang of Mandarin (Chineese)! If you want your children to have an advatange in the job market, make them learn a 2nd and 3rd language. The 2 largest growing economies are predicted to be China and India in the next 10 years.

And back to your other question, yes they should have mentioned it if it was a requirement.




LinnaeaBorealis -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 7:41:07 PM)

When I went to school a foreign language was required, but not until High School, unfortunately. I find language easy to learn, but most people do not. Much easier to learn when one is younger than high school age. In fact, languages were so easy for me that I took 2 & planned to be a French & Spanish teacher. Until I remembered that kids intimidated me, especially in large groups.




HeatherMcLeather -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 7:51:04 PM)

French is required in school here right up to grade 10. But its really quite a joke. The Canadians who post on here aren't really a representative group, most English Canadians speak French worse than me.

But speaking a minimum of at least a little French is pretty much required for almost any job, even retail or waiting tables nowadays. That's why I'm studying it at home, and why Hanners and I spend part of each day speaking French, and why I'm going to take some in-depth French courses when I go back to school next fall, even though I have all the required French credits.

Its a skill employers want, so if I want any sort of job beyond the totally unskilled, then its up to me to acquire that skill, that's how I see it at any rate.




NuevaVida -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (5/31/2011 9:30:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AlwaysLisa

Has anyone else gone for a job, had the interview go exceedingly well, then, after all is said and done, they ask if your bilingual?   No mention of it being required or even desired in the ad.  Not to mention the dozens that ARE listed as bilingual only...isn't that discrimination? 




Just curious, if part of their client base was deaf, and they required their candidates to know ASL (American Sign Language), would you consider that to be discrimination?






sunshinemiss -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (6/1/2011 4:00:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: AlwaysLisa

I say, let those who take up residence in this country, learn the language.  



I'd like to weigh in on this debate if I may.

First of all - learning another language at an intermediate level even is difficult at a certain age (like Linnea I pick up languages relatively easily, but there are some that I just can't - Korean being one of them). I do live in a foreign country. I do not speak the language. I know enough to get by, but NOT enough to even have a conversation. What I do though is talk to the Koreans who speak Spanish and English - works out well (except that whole Espana lisping /s/ thing which boggles my mind).

What should we do with the people that are fleeing poverty, death, war, etc? Require them to learn English while they are trying to save their lives? Of course not. And I know there are people who will go down the rosy path of, live here, learn our language... Well it's not all that easy. Besides the money, time, travel, etc. expense of it all (and dealing with family issues that come up as a part of that), learning another language is HARD and FRUSTRATING with very little bang for your buck.

Anyway, prior to living abroad, I worked with a lot of people of many different nationalities who spoke many languages. In fact the people who needed translators were always given to me becaause I enjoyed the process and the connecting - even when we couldn't use words.

In that previous job I worked with people who spoke Cambodian, Vietnamese, French, Spanish, or ASL predominantly. There were certainly other languages, but those are the ones that I worked with FREQUENTLY. It would do me not a dang bit of good to have a French speaker with me if the person were from Cambodia and spoke only their local language.
Requiring bi-lingualism, say for the Cambodian Refugee Program, that is - someone who speaks that language, just plain makes sense.

I also want to add that I have no intention of learning to speak Korean. I get along just fine without it. Sure, I miss out on 25% off deals, and I sometimes end up on the wrong part of town because I hopped on the wrong bus, and yes, I need my doctor / dentist / optician to speak English (and by the way, they DO), and I don't get the opportunity to speak with some of the every day people, but I can live with that. I have learned that all over the world, people are very open to non-verbal communication and interaction. Only in the USA (and some in France) have I encountered this deep-seated disdain for people who don't learn the native language.

I am no different in Korea than the Mexican woman who lives in her barrio and doesn't venture into the English speaking world across the road. I'm no different than the African man who stays with his children who are bilingual and watches the French television station because it's the only one he understands.

I am quite content in my inability to speak the language of the country where I live. It is not worth the effort to try to learn. And for people learning English in the USA, the Americans sure don't make it worth the effort - the nastiness over mistakes, the ridicule and mean spiritedness that Americans often display toward people who actually ARE learning the language would make me never want to learn English over there. Americans forget that learning a language is a process. Do you know why it is forgotten? Too many of them don't speak more than English. They have no experience, they have no compassion.

Nueva Vida -
I would like to clarify something based on what you asked.

quote:

Just curious, if part of their client base was deaf, and they required their candidates to know ASL (American Sign Language), would you consider that to be discrimination?


The question can't even be asked without this clarification - where is the person? If the person is in the USA, that's one answer. If the person is elsewhere, it is another answer. It is a common mistaken belief that deaf people speak ASL. Deaf AMERICANS do, but not DEAF people.

One night I was at a bar here in Korea, and a group of deaf people came in with some guy from OZ who just happened to meet them. They were able to communicate enough for him to invite them to join him for a beer. Well, it became clear almost immediately that the group were all deaf Koreans (they worked for LG - the plant hired only deaf people in the noisiest part of the factory. That makes practical sense to me, by the way.... but I digress). Anyway, when the Ozzie introduced me, I naturally started speaking in ASL with them. Their eyes lit up. One guy, as it turned out could speak both American Sign Language AND Korean Sign Language. He interpreted my ASL into KSL. So here's how it went.

People around the bar speaking English -> Sunny translating into ASL-> Deaf man translating into KSL -> Other deaf people responding to original statement-> Deaf man translating KSL into ASL -> Sunny translating ASL into English.

Everyone gave us a wide berth that night so we could all talk. One of my fondest memories of my first year in Korea.

best,
sunshine

(I know it was long, but it's a topic dear to my heart)




LadyConstanze -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (6/1/2011 4:28:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Would anyone consider is discrimination if an ad stated someone to be bilingual, and the other language they are seeking is never specified until you go to the interview?



I'd consider it perfectly stupid, the company is wasting time and resources by interviewing people who might not have the skills to do the job, it gives you an idea how they run their day to day business and personally I would walk out unless I was in dire need of a job.




JstAnotherSub -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (6/1/2011 4:45:14 AM)

Sunny I love you!

I am in the position of having to hire a food service assistant this summer, due to one of my ladies retiring. We have a large Latino population, and many of our parents do not speak English. Even though we have a parent liason to interpret, and several other employees who have English as their second language, I would love to hire someone who is bilingual, just to save me the hassle of using my broken Spanish and sign language.

Bilingual is not a job requirement, but, if all other things are close to equal, I would choose someone who spoke Spanish over someone who did not. It just makes sense, given the situation.

As for this.....
quote:

People around the bar speaking English -> Sunny translating into ASL-> Deaf man translating into KSL -> Other deaf people responding to original statement-> Deaf man translating KSL into ASL -> Sunny translating ASL into English.


I have this image in my head of someone starting with the line of "So a priest, a rabbi, and satan walk in to a bar", and, as the joke progresses, people laughing in shifts as they finally get the punch line.

It is funny as hell in my head anyhow-lol.




sunshinemiss -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (6/1/2011 4:54:31 AM)

quote:

I have this image in my head of someone starting with the line of "So a priest, a rabbi, and satan walk in to a bar", and, as the joke progresses, people laughing in shifts as they finally get the punch line.

It is funny as hell in my head anyhow-lol.


That's actually not too far off the mark!

Welcome to my world. :)

I will often put jokes as homework / extra credit for my students so that they have to look it up online or they have to talk to a foreigner - they are not always obvious answers. (today it was pouring buckets o' rain, so the question was: EXTRA CREDIT: April showers bring May flowers. What do May flowers bring?)

I love doing that. They will find out the answer, and then they explain it to their friends in Korean. The friends are all "blink blink" and then they are like "English joke". I saw a woman signing once who was doing the interpretation for a lesbian comedienne. The comedienne's punchline was, "OH, I thought you said she was Lebanese." What made me really laugh was the interpretor's expression. She interpreted it exactly and then added "hearing joke".... and all the deaf people said, "ah".

:)




AlwaysLisa -> RE: I didn't need a passport to get here...... (6/1/2011 6:25:54 AM)

quote:

Get it straight, there is NO official language in the U.S... You are from Washington state, which not only does not have an official language, it passed a English Plus resolution back in 89. So you are completely wrong and have absolutely no basis on which to base a claim of discrimination on the State or Federal level.


Obviously, you missed our Presidents speech, in which he declared English this countries language and strongly urged EVERYONE to learn it.   Thats ok, I understand not everyone listens when he speaks.

We live in WA state, that part is true.   We also reside in a largely agriculture area, meaning lots of migrant workers.  This doesn't change the fact that people who reside in this country should make the effort to speak English.  When I lived in CA, I witnessed the government forms and documents go from English, to English/Spanish, then they morphed into English/Spanish/Chinese/and Korean.   You may agree with this, I don't happen to.  My choice.

I also don't believe in free health care, or benefits from this country for illegal immigrants, but that is another topic.  You want to live here and make a better life for your family?  Great, thats what this country was founded on.  But learn the language and don't expect hand outs.

I tried to post a link, but it wouldn't take, regarding the Obama speech I referenced.  You can find it easily enough on Google. 









Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125