Arpig
Posts: 9930
Joined: 1/3/2006
From: Increasingly further from reality
Status: offline
|
Lets take this from the top, shall we?
1. You stated in your OP: the list of men interested totals in the thousands literally after a very short time.
2. In your next post you stated: telling you from first hand experience that i have received literally thousands of responses from men seeking it
So we have you saying not once, but twice, that you have received "literally" (which means you are being precise and not exagerating, BTW) thousands of positive responses. I'll be generous and say that we are talking 2000 (the minimum number that can literally be considered "thousands"), though your wording implies more.
3. In your next post you say: i kid you not,i am quite serious over a thousand
Wowzers! that's quite a backpedal in a short period of time, from a minimum of 2000+ to over a thousand. Right about here is where we begin to doubt the accuracy of your analysis and numbers.
4. When I suggested that most of those thousands/over a thousand were insincere wankers, you replied (post #17): actually the majority ask to meet and the majority seem quite real and serious.
So now we have you implying that a minimum of 501 men are serious and asked to meet (Its simple math.."Over a thousand" = a minimum of 1001. A majority of 1001 = a minimum of 501). very impressive statistics, at this point I'm thinking...OK, maybe I judged hastily, these numbers are telling.
5. A little further on (post #26) when questioned about the feasibility of answering that many responses in so short a time, you replied: i have not communicated with a thousand men i have received a thousand messages!
Ah good! I says to myself, I had wondered about that..so we now have the majority of some unspecified number less than 1000. But the next question that pops up is...just how many out of that 1000 did she communicate with? Now I'm not expecting an exact number, but a rough estimate would help us understand the numbers involved and their significance.
6. As luck would happen, in post #30 you do just that, give a rough idea of how many men you have actually communicated with. you say: i only have communicated with a few.
Oh dear! This presents a bit of a problem statistically speaking with your premise that its a very prevalent kink. We are now talking about the majority of the "few" you spoke to. Now we can assume that you did not communicate with the ones who wrote "i eet u shit pleez" or "I'm a Master but I want you to shit in my mouth", and so forth. By your own admission this is the vast majority of the responses (you only communicated with a "few", remember?).
So, where does this bring us? The majority of the responses were obviously insincere, wankers, or just plain nutjobs, and of the few that did seem like they might not be fakes, a sizeable percentage still turned out to in fact be fakes/time-wasters. Pretty much what I said would be the case.
This clarification brings up a few questions:
A. How is this different from what I said about the vast majority of those replies being wankers?
B. Since you changed your story with each post you made, what possible reason would any of us have to believe anything you say?
The floor is yours toylet...
_____________________________
Big man! Pig Man!
Ha Ha...Charade you are!
Why do they leave out the letter b on "Garage Sale" signs?
CM's #1 All-Time Also-Ran
|
RE: a never ending number of men seeking to be womans t... - 
Profile
M 
I would take it as a suggestion about things you love. M
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread