RE: moderation interpretation?

RE: moderation interpretation? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

tazzygirl -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/25/2011 12:58:26 AM)
[sm=rofl.gif]

sirsholly -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/25/2011 12:59:33 AM)
[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/25/2011 7:25:59 PM)
sunny.... That mouse happens to reside where?? IN ORLANDO< FLORIDA.......and what the hell were you talking about in January????

tazzygirl -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 12:55:41 AM)
sunny is in trouble!!!!! ~like thats a surprise ~edited because I wanted it to be Holly so badly... but I wuz wrong~

Hippiekinkster -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 1:16:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sirsholly Mouse, Sunny. Mickey is a mouse. Mouse posts on FL and B.cum.

sunshinemiss -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 4:47:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha sunny.... That mouse happens to reside where?? IN ORLANDO< FLORIDA.......and what the hell were you talking about in January???? Come on then wild woman! Bring your underoos! I'll be waiting. I'll be the gal with the sign that says.... Please don't hurt me. too much.

RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 4:53:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha sunny.... That mouse happens to reside where?? IN ORLANDO< FLORIDA.......and what the hell were you talking about in January???? Come on then wild woman! Bring your underoos! I'll be waiting. I'll be the gal with the sign that says.... Please don't hurt me. too much. This thread is proof that threads can go as off-topic as one could imagine ... so long as one or more mods are taking part in the off-topic postings. Personally, I like off-topic thread drift, but I do wish it was either a) allowed or b) not. As it stands, it's applied so inconsistently it's a bit of a joke.

DavidLee44UK -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 5:21:48 AM)
one rule for one one rule for another its like man untd vs anyone anyone gets a red card but when man utd do it its ok i mod a forum and im tougher on myself than anyone else oh well

LaTigresse -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 5:28:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha sunny.... That mouse happens to reside where?? IN ORLANDO< FLORIDA.......and what the hell were you talking about in January???? Come on then wild woman! Bring your underoos! I'll be waiting. I'll be the gal with the sign that says.... Please don't hurt me. too much. This thread is proof that threads can go as off-topic as one could imagine ... so long as one or more mods are taking part in the off-topic postings. Personally, I like off-topic thread drift, but I do wish it was either a) allowed or b) not. As it stands, it's applied so inconsistently it's a bit of a joke. Rather bad parenting eh[:D]

sunshinemiss -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 5:33:27 AM)
just not clever tonight

HannahLynHeather -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 10:28:19 AM)
quote: This thread is proof that threads can go as off-topic as one could imagine ... so long as one or more mods are taking part in the off-topic postings. Personally, I like off-topic thread drift, but I do wish it was either a) allowed or b) not. As it stands, it's applied so inconsistently it's a bit of a joke. [sm=boohoo.gif]waaah! waaaah! fucking waaah![sm=boohoo.gif]

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 10:44:20 AM)
RF- My apologies, I had assumed that everything that could be said about the moderation had, and you are correct; I was off topic.Let's see if there is anything left to say on topic, as I was the one guilty of leading it astray.

RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 10:55:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VideoAdminAlpha RF- My apologies, I had assumed that everything that could be said about the moderation had, and you are correct; I was off topic.Let's see if there is anything left to say on topic, as I was the one guilty of leading it astray. Please understand - I'm not anti off-topic, quite the reverse. I enjoy thread drift and I also find I learn more about people through reading the direction they take a thread (for good or bad, depending on the person) than if things stay rigidly on-topic. Also, I've learned more about certain subjects when they're on the fringe than if they'd stayed "in the centre". I'd vote for allowing threads to drift a great deal more than is currently the case, for the above reasons. My experience also is (on more generalist, non-BDSM forums of various types) that the forums that are very narrow in their interpretation of drift tend to be the more dull and stilted. Now that could merely be because the sort of people who only want to contribute to narrow-interest threads are more dull people, but I suspect it’s that online conversations, like real-life ones, are better and more interesting when they follow a broader path. Just a thought, that’s all.

Icarys -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 10:59:58 AM)
quote: I'd vote for allowing threads to drift a great deal more than is currently the case, for the above reasons. I would too if it was close to the topic in some way. Often you get assholes and bitches that enjoy trying to derail with jokes, completely different topics and complete nonsense in general. [:D] I'm an occasional asshole at times, I've staked my claim, get what's left.[8D]

RapierFugue -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 11:03:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys quote: I'd vote for allowing threads to drift a great deal more than is currently the case, for the above reasons. I would too if it was close to the topic in some way. Often you get assholes and bitches that enjoy trying to derail with jokes, completely different topics and complete nonsense in general. [:D] I'm an occasional asshole at times, I've staked my claim, get what's left.[8D] heh ... the thing is, generally, when a thread goes "sharp left" off-topic, it's because someone's decided to make a personal insult. Since those are covered under another topic/T&C, it should be possible to allow threads to drift, while still weeding out the arsehole posts. Obviously that's still going to leave you in a deep hole at least half the time but hey - I can only do so much to help in these situations ;)

Icarys -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 11:35:54 AM)
quote: Obviously that's still going to leave you in a deep hole at least half the time but hey - I can only do so much to help in these situations ;) A true humanitarian, I see.[:D]

NuevaVida -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 11:38:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys I would too if it was close to the topic in some way. Often you get assholes and bitches that enjoy trying to derail with jokes, completely different topics and complete nonsense in general. [:D] I admit I find the above to be totally annoying. A couple of posts joking around and such doesn't bother me, but when it becomes pages of bantering, I think it's rude to the OP and anyone still interested in what the original topic was. P&RS is a great place for fun bantering, not in a thread that was apparently important enough for the OP to post and others to reply to. Even if the thread has run its course, people coming in late in the game and catching up might find it useful, and have something else to say about it. But finding 3 or so pages of casual bantering could easily prevent them from adding anything, at that point. I know that's happened to me, and let's face it - what I have to share is extremely valuable. [8D] So there's my little soap box moment, here. I've done some joking and bantering in threads myself, but around my third "banter" post, I start feeling uncomfortable about doing it, and stop responding to that stuff.

VideoAdminAlpha -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 1:04:54 PM)
We tend to let more thread drift happen in offtopic and random than other areas also.

HannahLynHeather -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 1:05:13 PM)
quote: I think it's rude to the OP and anyone still interested in what the original topic was. if you want to talk further about the fucking topic, do so. how the fuck do the jokes and banter prevent that? quote: But finding 3 or so pages of casual bantering could easily prevent them from adding anything, at that point. why?

DeviantlyD -> RE: moderation interpretation? (6/26/2011 1:06:54 PM)
puts poster on ignore

Page: << < prev 32 33 34 [35] 36 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.0234375