|
master4bornslv -> RE: College Chancellor -Sex Dungeon (8/3/2011 10:11:01 PM)
|
What is with you people here on this site? Supposedly each member of this site joined because we believe in our right to communicate or become involved with others who are involved in or interested in BDSM practices, and yet you are talking about how he doesn’t have the same rights you all do?
This man and his girlfriend have every right to engage in what ever consensual sex they want to, and that includes searching for, advertize for or meet other adults with mutual consensual interests in the privacy of their home if that is what they want.
Plus, I notice that doing a search by his real name , and occupation do not bring up any profiles for them on Collarme.com Which means that Time-Warner/Tuner Time Sports and Entertainment website , thesmokinggun.com clearly invaded their privacy by giving out PRIVATE information about their perfectly legal activities was a clear violation of their privacy.
Trying to link their private activities with the unrelated fact that the University of Northern Virginia (but not the Chancellor himself) has been the subject of scrutiny as of late after immigration and customs officials raided the school, allegedly because of its questionable student visa policies, is the worst kind of cheap and improper journalism possible because it is flagrantly and deliberately misleading.
We have recently seen one media giant fall in Europe because of illegal and improperly gained and used private internet information.
What I would like to know is how they identified or knew which profile belonged to him? Because I doubt very much if collarme.com verified or identified the profile as belonging to him. Maybe it is time to take a serious look at how and why Time Warner gathers and prints what they are publishing.
Oh and saying that he (the Chancellor) should be held to some special standard because of his profession is ludicrous. This article served no other purpose than an attempt at sensationalism that violated his right to privacy.
If and I do mean If they had been able to show that they had ever in engaged in or been involved in some illegal sexual activity with a student this information could be appropriate to expose, especially IF that student was underage, and believe me if there was any evidence of either of these possibilities it would have been in the article, but they ( Time Warner Tuner Time Sports and Entertainment website) very carefully avoided a multi million $ legal slander suit by not making even a hint of either such possibility. Which means this stories only purpose was its so called shock or smear value to sell their product to the public even though they could show no improper or illegal activity on the Chancellors part.
The thing that bothers me is how many other site members will Time Warner choose to expose simply for a similar shock value while invading mine as well as your privacy. Most of you, like the Chancellor when he joined the site used a screen name because you want your privacy protected, but Time Warner doesn’t think privacy is a right, is his right to privacy any less important than yours?
Condemn Time Warner’s invasion of privacy, not another site members right to privacy when he joins the site to satisfy his similar interests in BDSM just like you have.
|
|
|
|
