RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:03:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
I talk to several people here off the board.  And I am not the only one to do so.   Some phone others- some have MET the others in person.

C-mails happen.   Get over it.

Are you actually unable to follow what orther people are saying due to a mental disability or are you just addicted to strawmanning? I don't have a fucking problem with people PMing. It was you who said you consulted with Termy, remember that at all? I have noticed that you conspiracists seem to support each others threads on this forum though, and it often goes way beyond the norm of just agreeing with the opinions of others.

WRONG

It feels like I'm talking with a two-year old but I'll try to explain. PAHunk you need to learn that it is not sufficient to simply pass judgement on an argument. You need to justify yourself if others disagree. Do you understand that at all? [8|]




DeviantlyD -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:07:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
I talk to several people here off the board.  And I am not the only one to do so.   Some phone others- some have MET the others in person.

C-mails happen.   Get over it.

Are you actually unable to follow what orther people are saying due to a mental disability or are you just addicted to strawmanning? I don't have a fucking problem with people PMing. It was you who said you consulted with Termy, remember that at all? I have noticed that you conspiracists seem to support each others threads on this forum though, and it often goes way beyond the norm of just agreeing with the opinions of others.

WRONG

It feels like I'm talking with a two-year old but I'll try to explain. PAHunk you need to learn that it is not sufficient to simply pass judgement on an argument. You need to justify yourself if others disagree. Do you understand that at all? [8|]


I'm fairly certain he doesn't. ;)




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:09:49 PM)

What is there to understand?  People support the ones who they agree with.

That is pretty standard.




Termyn8or -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:13:03 PM)

Anax, he has good days and other days. You are an ass, and I am going to tell you why right now as you have indicated that a mail from me would not be welcome. I'm sorry if it embarrasses others, and I'm sure it won't bother you because of what you are.

A very long time ago in grade(primary) school there was this kid, he was retarded or something. I guess he was alright but somehow, and I don't remember the details - we got into an argument. Well in the course of that argument I called him stupid, and he started crying. That hurt me because back then I had feelings. Since then I don't call the really stupid stupid. So when I call you stupid what it means is ignorant.

Understand ?

T^T




Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:15:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
FR

I am reallly learning here. People have these differences and it now seems that the issue(s) at hand are just a catalyst. Myself included, Anax mentions projection and I have as well. But am I myself guilty of same ? Possibly.

Wrong, I mentioned projection repeatedly. I accused you of it. It is something you have done repeatedly to attack others.

quote:


So using the word synagogue to a person who is clearly pro Israel makes me an anti-Semite ? Pish posh, I have no problem with Arabs, Palestinians etc. etc. And really if we bomb Israel into the stone age I have no problem with letting most of the Jews leave first, except the ones in the government, but then I think the same here in the US. If EVERY motherfucker who worked for the government died right now this place would be like fucking heaven, and you all know it.

You also used a Jewish term elsewhere in this thread when referring to me, have questioned where I live and even questioned my agenda.

That was not the only reason for saying you are an anti-Semite. Many on here know you have defended at considerable length the Elders of Ziyon forgery which is the primary text for justifying the Holocaust, have made out only a fraction of the death toll in the Holocaust is true, and buy into all the far-right ZOG conspiracism etc.

There was no mention of Israel until you did. It is telling you raise it here because you had huge issues with me disagreeing with some prominent Palestinian supporters on here.

quote:


Right now I'm about working on not getting goaded into an argumentative state. I thought I was infallible but I was wrong.

Alert the fucking media.

I don't care. Go apeshit. I can have more fun at your expense.

quote:


And the next time people want to call me a racist I am going to prove them right. What race controls most of the banks and insurance companies ? What race controls the largest lobbying group in the world, what race this and that and the other thing ?

You fucking want the truth, I can do that. But when this particular truth comes out it is called hate, even thopugh it is easily verifyable.

Ahh so is this more anti-Semitism? lol BTW the largest lobby group is the Saudi oil lobby not the Jewish one but fascists like yourself always ignore inconvenient facts.

quote:


Better to just shut the fuck up and let people figure it out for themselves, that is one of the things I have learned. And another thing I have learned is that no race has a monopoly on being nasty. Good thing for me because when I bust loose this timke the world is in a bunch of fucking trouble. I got my core people, tried and true. The rest of you will be sheared.

It now sounds like you have some sort of messiah complex! When I say messiah I mean a non-Jewish one of course! [:D] Where will your egomania end?




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:19:02 PM)

This thread is not about Jews.  

Stay with the topic.




Termyn8or -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:21:40 PM)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You know the only bad part of this exchange is that it might be difficult to get back to our normally scheduled arguments.

I'll have to wait for the proper segue. Wanna do it ? I can't, it would be like trying to tickle myself.

T^T




Termyn8or -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:25:00 PM)

"This thread is not about Jews.  "

Sure it ain't. Who fucking controls the major media outlets ? What is their race ?

Do you think their personal opinions might affect SOME of their decisions on what is "fit to print" so to speak ?

And do you think they would be more biased towards my views or those of Anax and his ilk ?

This thread is not about what now ?

T^T




DarkSteven -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:26:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"This thread is not about Jews.  "

Sure it ain't. Who fucking controls the major media outlets ? What is their race ?

Do you think their personal opinions might affect SOME of their decisions on what is "fit to print" so to speak ?

And do you think they would be more biased towards my views or those of Anax and his ilk ?

This thread is not about what now ?

T^T


Well, Roger Ailes controls Fox and he's sure not Jewish.  I'm not sure about the other networks.





Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:27:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
What is there to understand?  People support the ones who they agree with.

That is pretty standard.

Yes they do sometimes but you guys go a lot further. You or another fellow conspiracist starts a thread, another conspiracist joins it to validate/legitimise the views as if they are a given, and if there are no critics to cause a fuss, often the thread is perpetuated by you lot to an unusual extent. Others have noticed too. I remember Julia saying the same thing. You also keep backing each other up to an unusual extent as well. You for example have defended Termy from criticism a massive amount so much so that I said you two must be in a relationship on this very thread. I noticed that Termy does the same for R0 by paradoxically sounding vaguely critical but actually supporting his views on 9/11, NWO etc.




Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:28:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
This thread is not about Jews.  

Stay with the topic.

He is the one introducing Jewish inferences asswipe. You should tell him to stay on topic.




Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:29:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You know the only bad part of this exchange is that it might be difficult to get back to our normally scheduled arguments.

I'll have to wait for the proper segue. Wanna do it ? I can't, it would be like trying to tickle myself.

Ahh so you are waiting for someone else to start a thread for you to fire your shit out. How pathetic. Grow some hair on your balls and start one yourself.




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:30:06 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
What is there to understand?  People support the ones who they agree with.

That is pretty standard.

Yes they do sometimes but you guys go a lot further. You or another fellow conspiracist starts a thread, another conspiracist joins it to validate/legitimise the views as if they are a given, and if there are no critics to cause a fuss, often the thread is perpetuated by you lot to an unusual extent. Others have noticed too. I remember Julia saying the same thing. You also keep backing each other up to an unusual extent as well. You for example have defended Termy from criticism a massive amount so much so that I said you two must be in a relationship on this very thread. I noticed that Termy does the same for R0 by paradoxically sounding vaguely critical but actually supporting his views on 9/11, NWO etc.



We are the enlightened ones.   2012 is going to be a hoot. 




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:31:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"This thread is not about Jews.  "

Sure it ain't. Who fucking controls the major media outlets ? What is their race ?

Do you think their personal opinions might affect SOME of their decisions on what is "fit to print" so to speak ?

And do you think they would be more biased towards my views or those of Anax and his ilk ?

This thread is not about what now ?

T^T


Well, Roger Ailes controls Fox and he's sure not Jewish.  I'm not sure about the other networks.





I really did not mean this thread to be about the Jews.   430,000 Jews protested again in Israel- against cost of living rising- and the oligarchs.  Which tells me- they have the same trouble there with corporatism that we have here.




Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:33:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Anax, he has good days and other days. You are an ass, and I am going to tell you why right now as you have indicated that a mail from me would not be welcome. I'm sorry if it embarrasses others, and I'm sure it won't bother you because of what you are.

Here you are again with your PM shit. Thats why I commented on it. Fire away mutherfucker. Lets have fun.

quote:


A very long time ago in grade(primary) school there was this kid, he was retarded or something. I guess he was alright but somehow, and I don't remember the details - we got into an argument. Well in the course of that argument I called him stupid, and he started crying. That hurt me because back then I had feelings. Since then I don't call the really stupid stupid. So when I call you stupid what it means is ignorant.

Understand ?

I do. So what. You think me stupid. I can deal with that mutherfucker. I think you are borderline retarded. Don't start crying now! [:D]




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:34:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Anax, he has good days and other days. You are an ass, and I am going to tell you why right now as you have indicated that a mail from me would not be welcome. I'm sorry if it embarrasses others, and I'm sure it won't bother you because of what you are.

Here you are again with your PM shit. Thats why I commented on it. Fire away mutherfucker. Lets have fun.

quote:


A very long time ago in grade(primary) school there was this kid, he was retarded or something. I guess he was alright but somehow, and I don't remember the details - we got into an argument. Well in the course of that argument I called him stupid, and he started crying. That hurt me because back then I had feelings. Since then I don't call the really stupid stupid. So when I call you stupid what it means is ignorant.

Understand ?

I do. So what. You think me stupid. I can deal with that mutherfucker. I think you are borderline retarded. Don't start crying now! [:D]


WRONG




Anaxagoras -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:35:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
What is there to understand?  People support the ones who they agree with.

That is pretty standard.

Yes they do sometimes but you guys go a lot further. You or another fellow conspiracist starts a thread, another conspiracist joins it to validate/legitimise the views as if they are a given, and if there are no critics to cause a fuss, often the thread is perpetuated by you lot to an unusual extent. Others have noticed too. I remember Julia saying the same thing. You also keep backing each other up to an unusual extent as well. You for example have defended Termy from criticism a massive amount so much so that I said you two must be in a relationship on this very thread. I noticed that Termy does the same for R0 by paradoxically sounding vaguely critical but actually supporting his views on 9/11, NWO etc.

We are the enlightened ones.   2012 is going to be a hoot. 

That sounds like you are saying I am right. Thank you for your time. [:)]




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:39:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
quote:

ORIGINAL: Anaxagoras
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
What is there to understand?  People support the ones who they agree with.

That is pretty standard.

Yes they do sometimes but you guys go a lot further. You or another fellow conspiracist starts a thread, another conspiracist joins it to validate/legitimise the views as if they are a given, and if there are no critics to cause a fuss, often the thread is perpetuated by you lot to an unusual extent. Others have noticed too. I remember Julia saying the same thing. You also keep backing each other up to an unusual extent as well. You for example have defended Termy from criticism a massive amount so much so that I said you two must be in a relationship on this very thread. I noticed that Termy does the same for R0 by paradoxically sounding vaguely critical but actually supporting his views on 9/11, NWO etc.

We are the enlightened ones.   2012 is going to be a hoot. 

That sounds like you are saying I am right. Thank you for your time. [:)]


and our job is to rescue you from the NWO.   Dont take the chip.  DONT.




NocturnalStalker -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:40:12 PM)

Ladies, please.




pahunkboy -> RE: FOX fakes Irene coverage (9/5/2011 7:41:56 PM)

YEAH LADIES!




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875