RE: The anti pro stance (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


RedMagic1 -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 2:32:29 PM)

MissKittyDivine, you might be interested in the first post I ever made on this message board, in May 2007. My position has not changed since then. You are overreacting because I asked you rhetorical questions that I (and everyone else) knew the answer was "no" to.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=1011482




thishereboi -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 2:38:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kainundeva


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine

Please do get it into your head: Pro domming has nothing to do with sex.



now this makes me scratch my head. according to this a male sub never gets a hard on by being dominated by a pro? come on... is sex for you only fucking?



I have had a lot of scenes that were very satisfying and I didn't get sexually aroused. I wasn't sexually interested in the person topping me and they were not interested in me in that way. I just wanted my ass beat and they just wanted to hit on someone. No sex just pain.

On the flip side, I get very turned on every time I see certain actresses on tv. Does that mean they are prostitutes?

Now maybe to you there is no point to play if there is no sex involved, but not everyone is wired the same way.




thishereboi -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 2:44:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine

Please do get it into your head: Pro domming has nothing to do with sex. Your exposure to sex workers may make you think that you are an expert on the subject, but it seems to have given you a rather warped attitude towards Pro Dommes, a subject about which it appears you know nothing.

You´re right, you have nothing useful to add since you are merely posting lengthy diatribes based on your self-proclaimed expertise.



Sorry, I have been a pro domme, and if you say it has nothing to do with sex you are kidding yourself, it has everything to do with sex and you are a sex worker, you are not an escort and you don't have sexual contact with clients, but their motivation and why they come to see you is sexual, it might not be sexual gratification but it's sexually driven. Or how often do you encounter guys who truly don't care what the domme looks like? The whole attire is sexually arousing (corsets, leather, boots, whips, chains, etc.) and how often will guys pick dommes they find physically repulsive? Sexual attraction seems to be the most important aspect.



Really, so when my friend was whipping the shit out of my back I was supposed to be getting aroused. And when my other friend used to flog me, I was supposed to get off on that too? And I was supposed to be picking them because they were hot and not because I knew them and trusted them not to harm me.

Damn, all this time I have been doing this shit wrong. Thanks for the heads up.[8|]

Omg, I just remembered. I have let men stick needles in me. And once again I forgot to get sexually aroused. I guess now I better go change my profile from lesbian to bi.




LadyConstanze -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 2:52:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine

Please do get it into your head: Pro domming has nothing to do with sex. Your exposure to sex workers may make you think that you are an expert on the subject, but it seems to have given you a rather warped attitude towards Pro Dommes, a subject about which it appears you know nothing.

You´re right, you have nothing useful to add since you are merely posting lengthy diatribes based on your self-proclaimed expertise.



Sorry, I have been a pro domme, and if you say it has nothing to do with sex you are kidding yourself, it has everything to do with sex and you are a sex worker, you are not an escort and you don't have sexual contact with clients, but their motivation and why they come to see you is sexual, it might not be sexual gratification but it's sexually driven. Or how often do you encounter guys who truly don't care what the domme looks like? The whole attire is sexually arousing (corsets, leather, boots, whips, chains, etc.) and how often will guys pick dommes they find physically repulsive? Sexual attraction seems to be the most important aspect.



Really, so when my friend was whipping the shit out of my back I was supposed to be getting aroused. And when my other friend used to flog me, I was supposed to get off on that too? And I was supposed to be picking them because they were hot and not because I knew them and trusted them not to harm me.

Damn, all this time I have been doing this shit wrong. Thanks for the heads up.[8|]

Omg, I just remembered. I have let men stick needles in me. And once again I forgot to get sexually aroused. I guess now I better go change my profile from lesbian to bi.


OK, you're so much better than the average client, go and get yourself a medal, hope you're happy with it. But the average client is not a lesbian, that is actually very very rare, the average client is a man who gets a sexual kick out of a session. Yeah, who ever heard about something so weird as a masochist or a fetishist having a pro-session.... So thanks for the heads up, seems I must have been living under a rock for 15 years, great that you tell me how it's done!




PeonForHer -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 3:11:58 PM)

FR

Hell's bells . . . This is becoming insane to me. Really, why should we care if pro-Dommes give their clients boners or not? (Though, me, I'd feel pretty damned cheated if I didn't get one!) Why should we care if they have sexual contact with their clients or not? Why should we care if they call themselves pro-dommes, prostitutes, whores, entertainers, special escorts, or even astronauts, for that matter?

And, yes, actors, dancers and singers who play to their sex appeal could be in amongst that mix, too.

The bottom line is that a) the less it has *directly* to do with sex and b) the higher paid the person doing it, the higher status, and moral virtue, that's automatically attached. These are tired, fucked up old values that we should be learning to ditch, rather than playing along with. I mean, really. It's not even the 20th century anymore, never mind the 19th.




Bhruic -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 3:26:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine
Nobody seems capable of differentiating between sex and sexuality.



I agree with that statement... but it seems to include you. People have been pointing out that sexuality, sensuality and eroticism are part of sex, and you seem to have been arguing that it is not. Are you simply being misunderstood?




thishereboi -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 4:45:30 PM)

I never claimed to be better than anyone. I was merely pointing out that bdsm isn't always about sex. Sorry you missed that.




AAkasha -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 5:03:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Hell's bells . . . This is becoming insane to me. Really, why should we care if pro-Dommes give their clients boners or not? (Though, me, I'd feel pretty damned cheated if I didn't get one!) Why should we care if they have sexual contact with their clients or not? Why should we care if they call themselves pro-dommes, prostitutes, whores, entertainers, special escorts, or even astronauts, for that matter?

And, yes, actors, dancers and singers who play to their sex appeal could be in amongst that mix, too.

The bottom line is that a) the less it has *directly* to do with sex and b) the higher paid the person doing it, the higher status, and moral virtue, that's automatically attached. These are tired, fucked up old values that we should be learning to ditch, rather than playing along with. I mean, really. It's not even the 20th century anymore, never mind the 19th.


I don't know how the anatomy or biology works for men. But I often get very sexually aroused - ie WET - from BDSM activities, play, and fantasy, but that kind of "wet" does not make me necessarily want to have sexual intercourse or even orgasm. But traditional foreplay, ie, petting, kissing, etc. makes me wet and makes me want to have sex or orgasm.

So while being "aroused" during BDSM can be highly intensely charged on an erotic level, it can also be fully clothed, include no sexual touching, and no sexual release. That might have to do with the difference between female and male wiring though.

I also don't need to have an orgasm to have a fully mindblowing femdom experience. I do have an all-over-body shudder that feels AS GOOD as an orgasm and has a similar emotional aftermath, but it's not the same as a sexual orgasm. Go figure.

Akasha




TNDommeK -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 6:15:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

FR

Hell's bells . . . This is becoming insane to me. Really, why should we care if pro-Dommes give their clients boners or not? (Though, me, I'd feel pretty damned cheated if I didn't get one!) Why should we care if they have sexual contact with their clients or not? Why should we care if they call themselves pro-dommes, prostitutes, whores, entertainers, special escorts, or even astronauts, for that matter?

And, yes, actors, dancers and singers who play to their sex appeal could be in amongst that mix, too.

The bottom line is that a) the less it has *directly* to do with sex and b) the higher paid the person doing it, the higher status, and moral virtue, that's automatically attached. These are tired, fucked up old values that we should be learning to ditch, rather than playing along with. I mean, really. It's not even the 20th century anymore, never mind the 19th.



Well I'm a fucking hooker astronaut so everyone can kiss it! Lol. No really, I love the statement I put in bold.




Mupainurpleasure -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 9:19:58 PM)

there is somethng to be said for pro's. people like me would have a rats ass chance of experience without them. the population of Dom vds SUB seems to leave many subs unattached. When someone who is ifestyle does latch onto the frenzied newbs like me who have had a taste want more and failed to find a connection itcan be dangerous. I was approached was grateful for the chance and three days in realized I should use the power of google when a questionare read like an applation for mblackmail. The search connected the name and some rather vicious sites about emptying subs bank accounts. A pro is direct there is known tribute and they are not engaged in actively victimizing the naive. I have a play sesion with someone Saturday but that isnt of permanence it's not serious andlacks the surrender of will and desire I wis to offer someday. it will include live broadcast to some friends who wantto watch so I guess it's public lol. I am sure the woman peparing to exploit me (diiferent site btw)considers it financialdomination but when it's a slippery manipulation it's extortion not bdsm




subbyinlosangele -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 9:55:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine

Please do get it into your head: Pro domming has nothing to do with sex. Your exposure to sex workers may make you think that you are an expert on the subject, but it seems to have given you a rather warped attitude towards Pro Dommes, a subject about which it appears you know nothing.

You´re right, you have nothing useful to add since you are merely posting lengthy diatribes based on your self-proclaimed expertise.



Sorry, I have been a pro domme, and if you say it has nothing to do with sex you are kidding yourself, it has everything to do with sex and you are a sex worker, you are not an escort and you don't have sexual contact with clients, but their motivation and why they come to see you is sexual, it might not be sexual gratification but it's sexually driven. Or how often do you encounter guys who truly don't care what the domme looks like? The whole attire is sexually arousing (corsets, leather, boots, whips, chains, etc.) and how often will guys pick dommes they find physically repulsive? Sexual attraction seems to be the most important aspect.



Really, so when my friend was whipping the shit out of my back I was supposed to be getting aroused. And when my other friend used to flog me, I was supposed to get off on that too? And I was supposed to be picking them because they were hot and not because I knew them and trusted them not to harm me.

Damn, all this time I have been doing this shit wrong. Thanks for the heads up.[8|]

Omg, I just remembered. I have let men stick needles in me. And once again I forgot to get sexually aroused. I guess now I better go change my profile from lesbian to bi.



I'm with Lady Constanze on this one. I have never purchased the services of a pro domme, but I'd say for most subs there is a sexual aspect to their interaction with their domme, even if they don't engage in sex. In fact, I'd say that's a "no duh."




LadyConstanze -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/18/2012 10:19:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha



I don't know how the anatomy or biology works for men. But I often get very sexually aroused - ie WET - from BDSM activities, play, and fantasy, but that kind of "wet" does not make me necessarily want to have sexual intercourse or even orgasm. But traditional foreplay, ie, petting, kissing, etc. makes me wet and makes me want to have sex or orgasm.

So while being "aroused" during BDSM can be highly intensely charged on an erotic level, it can also be fully clothed, include no sexual touching, and no sexual release. That might have to do with the difference between female and male wiring though.

I also don't need to have an orgasm to have a fully mindblowing femdom experience. I do have an all-over-body shudder that feels AS GOOD as an orgasm and has a similar emotional aftermath, but it's not the same as a sexual orgasm. Go figure.

Akasha


Absolutely, but that's a female thing. Every male masochist I've ever known (most women really don't tend to be clients of pro dommes, they can get it for free) could take more pain and craved more pain when aroused, to claim that BDSM is non-sexual is just crazy, if it wouldn't arouse us to some level, during or after play, why on earth would we actually do it? I never had the desire to jump somebody I just whipped, but it gave me a sexual charge and a thrill, I called it the top high, but I assume it's similar or the same to what you call a femdom experience. The feeling that all of your senses are heightened, things become super clear and are in focus and there is an intensity that's almost like an electrical current running through your body, it's very sexual for me, even if it doesn't lead to sex with the person I happen to play with.




thishereboi -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 6:03:10 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze


quote:

ORIGINAL: AAkasha



I don't know how the anatomy or biology works for men. But I often get very sexually aroused - ie WET - from BDSM activities, play, and fantasy, but that kind of "wet" does not make me necessarily want to have sexual intercourse or even orgasm. But traditional foreplay, ie, petting, kissing, etc. makes me wet and makes me want to have sex or orgasm.

So while being "aroused" during BDSM can be highly intensely charged on an erotic level, it can also be fully clothed, include no sexual touching, and no sexual release. That might have to do with the difference between female and male wiring though.

I also don't need to have an orgasm to have a fully mindblowing femdom experience. I do have an all-over-body shudder that feels AS GOOD as an orgasm and has a similar emotional aftermath, but it's not the same as a sexual orgasm. Go figure.

Akasha


Absolutely, but that's a female thing. Every male masochist I've ever known (most women really don't tend to be clients of pro dommes, they can get it for free) could take more pain and craved more pain when aroused, to claim that BDSM is non-sexual is just crazy, if it wouldn't arouse us to some level, during or after play, why on earth would we actually do it? I never had the desire to jump somebody I just whipped, but it gave me a sexual charge and a thrill, I called it the top high, but I assume it's similar or the same to what you call a femdom experience. The feeling that all of your senses are heightened, things become super clear and are in focus and there is an intensity that's almost like an electrical current running through your body, it's very sexual for me, even if it doesn't lead to sex with the person I happen to play with.




so because it is always sexual for you, you assume it has to be that way for everyone else? Interesting theory.




Bhruic -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 7:03:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kainundeva


quote:

ORIGINAL: MissKittyDeVine

Please do get it into your head: Pro domming has nothing to do with sex.



now this makes me scratch my head. according to this a male sub never gets a hard on by being dominated by a pro? come on... is sex for you only fucking?



I have had a lot of scenes that were very satisfying and I didn't get sexually aroused. I wasn't sexually interested in the person topping me and they were not interested in me in that way. I just wanted my ass beat and they just wanted to hit on someone. No sex just pain.



I'm curious... what exactly IS the feeling you experience from receiving pain inflicted upon you by another? I am assuming it is something different from what you might feel from whacking your hand with a hammer? Is there truly no component of arousal in your pain experience at all?

I admit I have difficulty conceiving of such a situation, but I accept that it must exist. I have known people who sought pain for its own sake, but they generally just cut themselves.




TNDommeK -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 10:58:08 AM)

Different strokes for different folks. I'm sure a large amount of My subs get turned on. I am very much into pain infliction when it comes to My sessions, so most of those who book are into that as well. For Me, it is about the money, but there is nothing wrong with enjoying Myself. Not meaning sexually, I just enjoy inflicting pain on others. So what ever that makes Me, I am...As I said, astronaut!




LadyHibiscus -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 11:07:53 AM)

Lots of my pro clients had ED. They might have been aroused, but they didn't "show" it, as it were. I got aroused by... maybe three clients, altogether. I know I was a sex worker, but there wasn't any sex happening in my studio, except for the occasional slut deep throating my strap on. What the men felt sexually was really not my problem. Some were allowed to masturbate for my entertainment.

If I waited to only play with someone that I was interested in sexually, I would essentially never play. I respect that play is foreplay for many, but I am a sadist, and I need a masochist.

Professional playing honed my creativity, and was just plain fun. I got the chance to do a lot of unusual things, and do a lot of ordinary things over and over and over. I didn't get very damp, though.




JeffBC -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 11:11:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
I never claimed to be better than anyone. I was merely pointing out that bdsm isn't always about sex. Sorry you missed that.

of COURSE it's all about sex... for everyone... always. I've lost count of the number of times people have told me that. ~laughs~




mnottertail -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 11:20:22 AM)

I would imagine an anti-pro stance to be one in which you would use your hands to cover your nuts to fend off any stilletto kicks.




TNDommeK -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 11:22:08 AM)

Haaaaaaa!




thishereboi -> RE: The anti pro stance (4/19/2012 11:27:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bhruic
I'm curious... what exactly IS the feeling you experience from receiving pain inflicted upon you by another? I am assuming it is something different from what you might feel from whacking your hand with a hammer? Is there truly no component of arousal in your pain experience at all?

I admit I have difficulty conceiving of such a situation, but I accept that it must exist. I have known people who sought pain for its own sake, but they generally just cut themselves.


It's hard to describe. Kinda floaty and out of it. And no whacking my hand with a hammer would just hurt. Now when I played with my gf, it was different. She would talk to me about things we had done or things she wanted to do that were sexual and also play with parts that were off limits to others. But I wasn't turned on by the play, I was turned on by her because we had a sexual relationship and she turned me on. She would have the same effect on me when I was washing dishes.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 7 [8] 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875