Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Oh man. I have been SOOOOO wrong.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Oh man. I have been SOOOOO wrong. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Oh man. I have been SOOOOO wrong. - 4/9/2012 6:46:12 AM   
fucktoyprincess


Posts: 2337
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
quote:

ORIGINAL: fucktoyprincess
In other words, I'm suggesting you are like a gay man who doesn't want to embrace the term "gay". You are a kinkster who still wants to use the label vanilla. This is what I don't quite understand.

Not my style... this is the same guy who posted pictures of himself in a thong. I'm pretty comfortable with whatever I am. This, I've learned, was simply a total miscalibration of what it means to be kinky. To exaggerate, because I came into the whole kink world basically naive about sex in general, it seemed like if I didn't have two trapezes and a bondage cross in my living room then it was vanilla LOL.

Take the leash thing. For most of the time, that's been mostly like a "6' long wedding ring". It wasn't really a bondage device. Heck, it had a velcro closure that if you tugged on it at all came loose (but it was easy to put on and off). So it didn't seem very "bondage-ey". Upon closer review, most guys don't have photos of their wives kneeling with a collar and leash :) Yes, I can be incredibly obtuse sometimes.

It's also confusing because even the D/s component isn't eroticized. I don't own Carol because it's sexy. I own her because it works for us. So it was difficult to visualize it as "erotic domination and submission" because it's not. ~shrugs~

In the end, all I know is that I like being able to use adult words to discuss adult topics with adults. I like being in a place where a mere fantasy is not automatically a crime.


No worries. You know, I'm not hung up on labels per se except that at certain times they can be very effective at communicating basic things about oneself. I do have to laugh (just a little) at your sense of what vanilla meant.

I also think what is interesting about your observation is that many of us are not so concerned about the labels, however, many are (rightfully) concerned about the level of acceptance we might get within a given community, and what that means for finding a "home" for ourselves. While BDSM is a large umbrella, and it covers many things that I am most decidedly not into, this is the only community that embraces and accepts my combination of kinks, relationship type, sexual orientation, etc. in totality. Even if I can't define what exactly vanilla is, or what exactly BDSM is (because both, in some senses do not lend themselves to simple pat definitions), I can say with some self-assuredness, that the vanilla community in general is not really that welcoming of the things that I find of interest. I do not discuss my BDSM proclivities with any of my vanilla friends. Period. Because I know that as accepting as they are about so many things about me, that the moment I mention BDSM gear, D/s dynamics, etc. I will get not get just blank stares (which I could live with), but more likely serious concern about the state of my mental health (even though I have no, zero, psychological issues otherwise). Vanilla people still consider much of what goes on under the BDSM umbrella to be either psychologically wrong at best, or a crime, at worst. And I'm simply not interested in defending myself to anyone over lifestyle choices I have made that, for me, personally, come from a healthy adult sexuality. I would rather discuss these things with like-minded people who, instead of judging, can move on to other issues around how to do these things safely, consensually, etc. rather than spend too much time hand-wringing over the "appropriateness" of such things. Most of my world is vanilla. And I love my friends and family who are. But this part of me only gets shared within the community of people where I know I will find acceptance. And I'm not convinced that even a book like 50 Shades of Grey will ever make BDSM completely mainstream and acceptable. People enjoy the book the way they might enjoy a serial killer book. I think vanilla people find it entertaining as a fantasy, but when confronted with people who actually live that way, it makes people concerned, or scared.

It sounds to me like you are both very open minded in general - and so perhaps these labels were not meaningful personally. But it is important to remember that the rest of the world is not as open minded about sex or relationship dynamics. Not even close. Anyway, I guess I should welcome you to the club. I think given what you and Carol do that you will always find it a more welcoming place than the vanilla world.

And, not that it matters, but some of the gear I use have velcro closings, too. Sometimes, depending on type of play, it is much safer. Not to mention some of the play that I'm into (like resistance play) doesn't necessarily require any equipment at all. Don't judge by the equipment of lack thereof. Judge by the mindset. I think you have a mindset much more in common with those of us here than those in the vanilla world.....


< Message edited by fucktoyprincess -- 4/9/2012 6:48:07 AM >


_____________________________

~ ftp

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Oh man. I have been SOOOOO wrong. - 4/9/2012 1:06:27 PM   
Alecta


Posts: 1355
Joined: 1/19/2010
Status: offline
I had no idea you thought you were vanilla lol

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC
I had no idea that simply broaching the idea of a threesome to your lover was instant divorce material. That's a level of sexual repression I could never get behind. It's not healthy.


I don't consider that a sexual repression so much as an insecurity... Vanilla people don't get upset because "zomg that's an unnatural act" when it comes to adding a third player, they're usually upset because they're convinced it's cheating, and "how dare you test me by wanting me to be with another man!" or "how dare you want another woman!" and the myriad "this sounds too simple (too good to be true?), you must be lying about your real intentions". A lot of vanillas' hangups come from their fear of rejection from their partners and society.

I often feel that vanilla relationships are unhealthy due to its stepford denial of the unpleasantries and power struggles inherent in any relationship. There are no rules that clearly define limits d accountability because vanilla relationships uphold the fantasy that everyone's on the same page and want the same things, and god forbid anyone be exploitative. You have rules of conduct in your relationship that you actually expect each other to follow? No! But that would shatter the illusion that all anyone needs in a relationship is love! And clearly define what is "ok" and what isn't within the bounds of your relationship. It's almost like a state of emotional anarchy sustained by its citizens' fear of potentially being found to be "wrong".

I have seen much more abuse in vanilla relationships than otherwise.

(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Oh man. I have been SOOOOO wrong. - 4/9/2012 1:07:18 PM   
Karmastic


Posts: 1650
Joined: 4/5/2012
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffBC

OK, you regulars have known for a long time that I see myself as vanilla. Yup, no whips & chains in our house. Some of you... along with a handful of our friends in real life... well... "politely nod" would be a nice way to put it.

Well, over the last few days I've been spending some time on a vanilla relationship site. OMG. The kinds of things that they think are just incredibly beyond the pall of reason. I seriously have to wonder if any of them are male or female at all -- perhaps a bunch of androgynes? robots? I think of myself as not particularly sexually worldly or knowledgeable but sheez.... if THAT is what the vanilla world is like then I'm the freakin Stephen Hawkings of Sex.

I'm gonna stop thinking I'm vanilla. Heck, long before my run in with BDSM I was WAY more open than that. My apologies for the confusion and those of you who are my friends may proceed with mocking me now :) Well, actually, you all can, but it'll be funnier from my friends who have the track record to mock me thoroughly and accurately.

Sorry, no particular BDSM question here. Although if anyone wanted to comment on the difference between subs and slaves we could probably get one going.


I guess it's really a continuum, and where we see ourselves on that evolves. And how we see the continuum evolves too. BDSM evolves from being the butt of someone else's joke (cus you always knew deep down it was more, at least for you) into hey, that could be me, to hey, that IS me!

I don't know the "marriage and sex" site, but it sounds like a gimmick. Like someone held focus groups to research what combination of things both men and women wanted. Duh! I suspect most women there are afraid to look like freaks or to be seen by the men as too eager based on the myth that kink/bdsm = easy slut. But I imagine that if you get them alone in bed, and they'll fold like a house of cards.


(in reply to JeffBC)
Profile   Post #: 43
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Oh man. I have been SOOOOO wrong. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.061