RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


lady4dad -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 11:12:19 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: lady4dad

from my knowledge most if not all European countries have both a health care system including mandatory health insurance and mandatory car insurance.
In Germany there is a mandatory health insurance since 1883 and no government from monarchy to nazi to to communist to democracy ever intended to abolish it ever again - and I know some German expats working in the US who prefer to board a plane back home to get teeth fixed or other necessary medical treatment

seems to be because of costs here plus plane ticket are still cheaper than getting treatment in the US ...





Interesting. A freind of mine lives in Germany. He waited until he came back to the states to get his teeth fixed because the insurance he carried didn't cover gas and they wouldn't let him pay out of pocket for it. Now I can understand saying that certain things won't be covered, but I don't understand why you can't then pay for what it doesn't cover.



maybe because hardly any dentist here uses gas (I think you mean nitrous gas) as an anesthetic and it would have been a lot of effort to get some plus all the machinery you need for just one special customer. Here usually you get a local anesthetic injection.




tazzygirl -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 11:16:59 AM)

In addition, each of Canada's 10 provinces also maintains a government-approved formulary, which determines which drugs will be available to Canadians. Once approved by the PMPRB, medication must then get the nod from each of the provincial formularies. Many provinces approve fewer than half of all the new drugs the board has okayed.

Not all drugs available in the US are available in Canada, from what I can discover. I wouldnt expect any country to offer all drugs made throughout the world. Nor do I see this as a government making health care decisions.





itsSIRtou -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 11:17:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi



why couldn't they offer tax breaks to those who hire people on welfare?

they do



Nope..... they USED to during the Clinton era.... as soon as bush sr got in ..the program was scrapped. there have been calls to bring back but of course, the GOP shot it down as too costly a program..... then wrote off on billions in military spending...Again.




tazzygirl -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 11:19:09 AM)

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i8850.pdf

No, they do offer some write offs. Hardly to the extent that the disabled gets.




tj444 -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 1:36:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

In addition, each of Canada's 10 provinces also maintains a government-approved formulary, which determines which drugs will be available to Canadians. Once approved by the PMPRB, medication must then get the nod from each of the provincial formularies. Many provinces approve fewer than half of all the new drugs the board has okayed.

Not all drugs available in the US are available in Canada, from what I can discover. I wouldnt expect any country to offer all drugs made throughout the world. Nor do I see this as a government making health care decisions.

I never said that all new drugs should be available or approved.. when i see new drug ads on tv with the long list of side effects, i wonder how in the world they ever did get approved.. especially when i see ads by ambulance chasing lawyers advertising class action lawsuits due to undisclosed and dangerous side effects of some of those same drugs.. (like Yaz) [8|]

But the allergy med i mentioned is not a new drug that needs to be approved, and i dont think the skin tag remover has anything new in it, its new as being direct to the consumer as a diy product.. I dont need big brother to treat me like an imbecile that doesnt know how to use these products responsibly..

Considering how easy it is for Big Pharma, insurance corps, etc etc to easily and successfully lobby and donate campaign contributions to corrupt politicians, you are trying to say i should just blindly trust this same govt???




BenevolentM -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 1:48:15 PM)

I finally finished watching the Peter Schiff's view of Obamacare video that was provided by tj444. I've been watching it in pieces. It was excellent. Do I feel that ObamaCare will necessarily fail? No. Could it fail? Yes. Do I want universal health care come to pass? Yes. Was it the intention all along to set up the free market people to fail? Maybe. The thought that Obama knew that it was a tax all along had crossed my mind.




tazzygirl -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 2:24:16 PM)

quote:

Considering how easy it is for Big Pharma, insurance corps, etc etc to easily and successfully lobby and donate campaign contributions to corrupt politicians, you are trying to say i should just blindly trust this same govt???


No, I am saying that each government has its own standards and reasons why something may or may not be offered OTC.




ClassIsInSession -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 2:24:22 PM)

tj444: So... ya wanna run off to an idylic tropical paradise with me??

I've hinted before that since you would be coming to DFW possibly...

When I do retire, I've always said I would move to the Caribbean and basically live on a boat, a grumpy old sailor like Popeye's dad, Pappy.
I don't know if that's idylic enough...there is a shortage of un-claimed land masses in the world.


vincentML: When you isolate a class of people by economic status instead of integrating them into the larger community it should be no surprise that role models are absent and resentment increases. Highrise housing projects are an anacronism. The last tower of Cabrini Green in Chicago was recently demolished. The problems you cite are more a result of erronious social theory and planning than a lack of aspirations among the poor, and certainly not indigenous to the color of their skin. I'll bet you can find similar failure amongst whites in public housing in London and Dublin. We need to stop blaming the victims of class stratification and find a workable system toward upward mobility. Sending manufacturing jobs to China has not been helpful.

Actually vincent, at one time I lived in Norview, and not in the projects, for 8 years. There was an "integration" into my neighborhood, and the trash and graffiti moved with it, never mind the crime. It isn't, nor did I say it was, indigenous to the color of anyone's skin. It's just a matter of fact that the particular projects I referred to were populated with african-americans. I'm quite certain you would find the same results in an all white welfare complex or of any racial trend, and I'm pretty sure I elaborated the psychological reasons behind it. Don't pull the race card on me, that is intellectually dishonest of you to do. I am not a bigot.

As to workable systems toward upward mobility... I've had this discussion from time to time most of my life. I did not grow up with a silver spoon. I received the same public school education as those same project kids and went to school right along side them. I chose to take that public school education and follow it with college, not to mention I've read 2-3 books a week since I was in grade school. And I had to wait quite a long time to get that college education because I had to pay for it and I didn't do it with loans. The results I got came from hard work, self control and making good decisions. You can wish in one hand and crap in the other, which one fills up first? It's very simple to blame class stratification, but really, it boils down to being about more than just day dreams and talk. There are plenty of examples of people who grew up without means and went on to be very successful. It's been done.

I distinctly remember being in Norview High School and having a girl disrupt class repeatedly with outbursts where she would scream, you can't make me *explicative* learn. And I remember distinctly having guys I went to school with come up to me at the 7-11 parking lot while I was going to college asking me for money. And I told them exactly what I just told you, "I am paying for my own education with money I saved up from years of hard work. I'm not going to give you money that I can't afford to give you, you need to work just like I did, you got the same education I did."

There was nothing holding them back but themselves. I worked with plenty of men and women at the shipyard who had grown up in the projects, so you can't even say it was the hiring practices in that economy. In fact, often, it was harder for me to get a job because I wasn't a minority in those cases. Eventually, everyone has to take responsibility for themselves, and that has nothing to do with race, gender, sexual preference or economic level.

I agree with you about the manufacturing sector and the jobs going overseas, and I have been outspoken about it many times before. Our greatest challenge to the economy is the exportation of jobs, and the global economy. The case has been argued that we wouldn't have all the cheap products we enjoy today were it not for the trade agreements and job exportation, but I will argue that a certain degree of closing the economy to our borders would create a market place where the cost of products and the wages paid to produce them would begin to level out. That is the way it was for many decades here earlier in our history. And even now, if I have the opportunity to purchase American made products over Chinese manufactured products I will do so even if I have to pay more for them.

The solution will come as gas prices continue to escalate and shipping drives the price of imported goods high enough. At some point I believe that will trip the trigger for manufacturing to return. As much as I hate the 300-400% increase in the cost of gas (a major unspoken cause of inflation and economic hardship) at some point, people will build and buy local out of necessity.




BenevolentM -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 2:43:24 PM)

These words from what I wrote in post 68 trouble me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

It also makes the insurance industry a de facto branch of government with the power to make law.


I believe that the insurance industry was a de facto branch of government with the power to make law prior to ObamaCare. Technically, speaking I believe I'm right, but ObamaCare does do something right. Before ObamaCare the insurance industry was not accountable to the people. They were only accountable to an alleged free market which isn't a free market because it is an oligarchy. Things can be the opposite to what they appear to be.




thishereboi -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:03:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i8850.pdf

No, they do offer some write offs. Hardly to the extent that the disabled gets.



thanks, I knew I could count on you. [:)]




BenevolentM -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:06:17 PM)

The problem I have with the argument that Obama is evil because he has broken some of his campaign promises is that as outrageous as this may seem that he broke his promises may in fact indicate that he is a man who takes his responsibilities seriously. It is one thing to be a candidate who has yet to carry any responsibility and another to sit in the chair and having to be responsible. As president he has to make rational decisions and We the People aren't entirely rational.




tazzygirl -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:06:54 PM)

I always try to post honestly. The write offs for the disabled are larger.. and more politically acceptable.




BenevolentM -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:11:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i8850.pdf

No, they do offer some write offs. Hardly to the extent that the disabled gets.


thanks, I knew I could count on you. [:)]


I pointed out in post 78 that as contrary to what appears obvious it can argued that whether or not they do is an immaterial fact. Unfortunately, what I am saying will likely seem abstract and difficult to understand. What appears to be so need not be so.




thishereboi -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:15:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I always try to post honestly. The write offs for the disabled are larger.. and more politically acceptable.


That doesn't make sense to me, but I see the two as being the same thing. They both are helping someone who can't help themselves and they both use tax money to do it.




tj444 -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:20:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Considering how easy it is for Big Pharma, insurance corps, etc etc to easily and successfully lobby and donate campaign contributions to corrupt politicians, you are trying to say i should just blindly trust this same govt???


No, I am saying that each government has its own standards and reasons why something may or may not be offered OTC.

yeah, sure.. of course there are different standards and expectations by each govt... I just think the US govt (by their actions) thinks everyone (but them, big biz & the 1%) is an imbecile and blindly accepts what the govt decides.. its the tail wagging the dog.. [>:]




BenevolentM -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:22:35 PM)

This is what I believe the Supreme Court Justices heard when they heard Obama speak
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ErkeFA-QWk




tj444 -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:24:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ClassIsInSession

tj444: So... ya wanna run off to an idylic tropical paradise with me??

I've hinted before that since you would be coming to DFW possibly...

When I do retire, I've always said I would move to the Caribbean and basically live on a boat, a grumpy old sailor like Popeye's dad, Pappy.
I don't know if that's idylic enough...there is a shortage of un-claimed land masses in the world.

lol First you have to tell me when you intend to retire, it has to be fairly soon.. and second, no living on a boat.. I want a nice house but a boat for fishing, scuba diving and stuff would be ok.. [:)] Oh,.. and no grumpy allowed!!!




tazzygirl -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:26:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

I always try to post honestly. The write offs for the disabled are larger.. and more politically acceptable.


That doesn't make sense to me, but I see the two as being the same thing. They both are helping someone who can't help themselves and they both use tax money to do it.


My initial comment was .. which one would employers hire. And, to my mind, they would hire those who give them the most benefit for their buck. Taking someone to stuff envelopes and lick stamps would not be suited to someone wanting to get off welfare because there is no chance for upward mobility.. which is what an employer would look for, in part.

I dont like the system, but I do see the benefits in each. Nor am I condemning businesses for employing the practice... its just the snark that welfare recipients arent looking... which isnt the case in many situations.




tazzygirl -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:29:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Considering how easy it is for Big Pharma, insurance corps, etc etc to easily and successfully lobby and donate campaign contributions to corrupt politicians, you are trying to say i should just blindly trust this same govt???


No, I am saying that each government has its own standards and reasons why something may or may not be offered OTC.

yeah, sure.. of course there are different standards and expectations by each govt... I just think the US govt (by their actions) thinks everyone (but them, big biz & the 1%) is an imbecile and blindly accepts what the govt decides.. its the tail wagging the dog.. [>:]


Oh, I dont always agree with what the USDA approves... nor do I agree with big pharma either.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenzo's_Oil

Orphan drugs are a big issue with me. Not profitable enough for big companies to produce.. yet life saving non the less.

Without knowing what meds you were seeking, its hard to determine why they arent offered as they are in Canada.




BenevolentM -> RE: ObamaCare and Mandatory Automobile Insurance (7/13/2012 3:36:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

I pointed out in post 78 that as contrary to what appears obvious it can argued that whether or not they do is an immaterial fact. Unfortunately, what I am saying will likely seem abstract and difficult to understand. What appears to be so need not be so.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zwbSDpROm8
At 1:00 minutes to 1:31 minutes.

quote:


The cold must have effected me more than I realized. Please don't pay attention I'm not myself. I'm behaving disgracefully. I've eaten animal flesh and I've enjoyed it. What is wrong with me! I tell you that you are beautiful. But you are beautiful. Is it so wrong to tell you so?




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875