SusanofO
Posts: 5672
Joined: 12/19/2005 Status: offline
|
I've had a few. One major one was whether or not I could mentally justify to myself having an affair in a relationship where, after 12 years of marriage, I simply was not getting my emotional or physical needs met at all, and had not been for 7 years, and the other person in the relationship objected to me not wanting to remain monogamous (also, not being monogamous was also clearly out of bounds as far as my religion was concerned) - but - the other person clearly wasn't ever going to meet those needs (they said they weren't and I believed them as they'd already proved they meant it). I had an affair anyway - and deliberately did not let them know (not that they would have energetically objected too much, would be my guess. I just didn't want to fight about it, or have to explain it if they did). Then, about a year into it, felt incredibly guilty - so I stopped having it. In hindsight, I've got no problem with having done that - at all (again). Doesn't matter now anyway - my own situation has completely changed since then. I think "justifying" that kind of thing is pretty situational and also depend's on someone's personal sense of "ethics". Many folks (although I agree there are amoral folks out there) - from your supposedly sane, "upstanding, back-bone of society" types to petty thugs on the streets are operating within their "code of honor" or has their "personal code", don't they? Much of the time all of it seems pretty - fluid - to me. I have to love when people want to apply cookie-cutter answers to scenarios that are both individually developed and dealt with. Some people (possibly much of the human race) apparently doesn't deal very well with ambiguity and prefers to live in a black-and-white world, as far as supposed "morals" are concerned - instead. It's easier, probably, since in many cases it takes a lot less thought and in some cases, less personal accountability. My religion, for istance, says I should: Object to homosexuals having a sex life and never ever take a birth-control pill. I'm not going to follow those "guidelines", though. They are against my "'personal code." I know we've got societal laws and courts, etc - for some very good reasons, and I do think some things (murder, for instance) are inherently wrong - But - (My take) if even "the law" was "cut and dried" as far as interpretation, then why would there even be a need for lawyers? Who'd need them? People wouldn't get trials - they'd just go straight to prison much of the time instead. Having said that, I've always been pretty fond of the ethical "test question": **What would the world be like to live in if everyone (not just you)did____________(whatever it is you're considering). Better or worse? If everyone: Ran red lights, beat their children, donated to charity - whatever. Even after you've answered that for yourself there will be people who'll disagree and debate what you may be considering - it really ends up being (I think) whatever you can you live with yourself (long-term) doing. I've had more than one "impulsive moment" I have not regretted in the long-term but still think - it never hurts to think it over for awhile if you're not sure. Can be easier said than done sometimes. Good luck. - Susan
< Message edited by SusanofO -- 6/24/2006 3:52:12 AM >
_____________________________
"Hope is the thing with feathers, That perches in the soul, And sings the tune without the words, And never stops at all". - Emily Dickinson
|