RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


CountrySong -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 1:30:46 AM)

The risk of a harrassment suit adds to the excitement...but seriously

That statement alone proves that you are not worthy of serving anyone in business and possibly in this lifestyle. Any sub who would risks their Doms/Dommes future just for thier kink is, in my book, unworthy of servicing anyone!
Your first priority in business should be the growth and continuation of the business. Your first priority as a sub should be your Dom/Domme needs and desires - not your own desires.
If you are actually interested in doing this then do evenyone you get involved with a favor - get an education in basic business law! Set up your own secretarial business and have your Domme/Dom mentor you in that business (maybe have them become a co-owner once you have proven yourself)!




LaTigresse -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 6:06:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SylvereApLeanan


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009

If you seek only to serve, your dick will likely reap the benefits in the long run. But if you focus primarily on your dick, you'll probably chase away any Domme who might have otherwise been able to utilize your services.


Sunny QotD!


I second that!

Awesome post Roch.




Tantriqu -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:08:59 AM)

One lovely ex- who was a shift-worker would come to my work at lunch or after hours and kneel under my desk in my private office; I would lock the door and . . .

But note that is NOT during work hours. If he's doing a good job, my eyes were closed, my back was arched, and I was thinking of only the very immediate future.
As for when I'm working at home, good men have to be very, very skilled at knowing when it's OK to distract me [that same good man was excellent at that, reading when I was not to be disturbed, and when to 'casually' sit on the floor near me in long-legged elegance, knowing he would be pounced on.
The porn pics of subs chained under desks are mere vanilla fantasies, and/or pics of women who do it for dominance, not pleasure.




focalss -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:09:56 AM)

LadyPact "Obviously, you have never worked in HR. If you had, you would know that the highlighted above is an instantaneous headache."

No, I haven't worked in HR, I only clean up their mistakes.

Sorry No one thought my comment was funny, I am just the clueless kinky guy.





GreedyTop -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:11:34 AM)

quote:

I am just the clueless kinky guy


and based on your OP, I would say that sums it up nicely.




SylvereApLeanan -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:16:47 AM)

Where's a Mod when you need one? "Clueless kinky guy" would make an awesome title for him. #justsayin

[sm=evil.gif]




GreedyTop -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:19:52 AM)

hasn't someone already claimed that title, Syl? There are so many, I'm not sure...




SylvereApLeanan -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:23:38 AM)

I honestly have no idea. It's certainly possible.




OsideGirl -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 8:44:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: focalss
Sorry No one thought my comment was funny, I am just the clueless kinky guy.


Actually, the fact that you thought the suit would be directed at YOU, says volumes. You never stopped to think about that the lawsuit would be aimed at the Dominant/Employer.






MistressDarkArt -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 10:26:32 AM)

I'm still waiting to hear if the OP would be willing to serve as an office assistant without any form of sex involved.




Alecta -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 10:29:13 AM)

I think his profile answers that question.




Rainwalker -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 11:43:57 AM)

quote:

till waiting to hear if the OP would be willing to serve as an office assistant without any form of sex involved.

I suspect you should not be concerned about his sexual posturing, in fact I am firmly convinced he would reject sex entirely as part of discussing the asccepting of an office assistant position with you.




MistressDarkArt -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 1:25:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alecta

I think his profile answers that question.


Bwahahaha...just looked. Point well taken.




focalss -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 2:25:34 PM)

In answer to the question that I didn't think I was asked, I would be willing to be an assistant to a woman in some situations without sex in others no. It would depend on the person and the situation. If I try it I will tell them that MistressDarkArt said I should.

To answer some of the other questions, people are reading a lot more into the questions and answers as I guess is usual in an online forum. Two or three people said it was basically an ok secenario (not the sex part during working hours though).

HR is usually a waste of time, sorry if that upsets someone...

For the harassment scenario with me as a sub and the boss as domme, it would have to be me that would be the "harassed" person and the supervisor a female superior. Then there would be an investigation and each of us would make up some story. The female executive could say I made advances. I would either be fired or moved to a different department in the company or the boss fired. That's the point where I could start suing.

Another way would be hostile work environment for someone else to say it happened to them. So really it would be a co worker of mine that would sue the company on the ground that I was given preferential treatment for sleeping with my boss or that they were harassed. If I was smart (not clueless), I would be the sub to the harasser then there would be two witnesses against her unless I blackmail the harasser to dom me or I would testify against her but that would defeat the point of the original question.

Oh, wait, wasn't there a movie about this with Michael Douglas and Demi Moore? The good thing about open office plans and cubicles is that it's easier for the supervisor if the door is never closed and the subordinate isn't alone or out of site of the rest of the work area or there are glass walls.

signed clueless guy




focalss -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 2:34:51 PM)

Now to answer Alecta, who is "a deeply sick and dark person," thanks for your comments on my profile, please take your own advice "Online Domination is little more than play-acting" and apply it to your participation on these boards. You don't have to like me and I don't like you.

Here's one from another three page profile "Make no mistake, however; [sic] at the appropriate time you will have no doubt who is in command here." Here's free advice to you, if you have to tell people its not working.

Why is it some people on this board have to call others names? Maybe that will be my next thread.




littlewonder -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 4:38:08 PM)


quote:

HR is usually a waste of time, sorry if that upsets someone...


If it wasn't for HR you'd never get a paycheck or health insurance through your job and all those other lovely bennies that come along with it, like vacation days, sick days, holidays off, etc...

I would absolutely LOVE to see you at work at a regular secretarial job....a REAL one, not the one in your fantasyland.




littlewonder -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 4:41:53 PM)

On second thought, I DO encourage you to find a real secretarial job with a hot woman as your boss. I wanna see how this plays out in real life. [:D]

And as to another thing I just thought of....is that you Kevin?




Alecta -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/6/2012 4:44:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: focalss

Now to answer Alecta, who is "a deeply sick and dark person," thanks for your comments on my profile, please take your own advice "Online Domination is little more than play-acting" and apply it to your participation on these boards. You don't have to like me and I don't like you.

Here's one from another three page profile "Make no mistake, however; [sic] at the appropriate time you will have no doubt who is in command here." Here's free advice to you, if you have to tell people its not working.

Why is it some people on this board have to call others names? Maybe that will be my next thread.


I have honestly no idea what you are talking about. Please explain. Where have I solicited online domination from you and where I have called you names? Where does my sadism and amorality come into it? Where did I mention on the boards that I'm in charge?




MistressDarkArt -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/7/2012 1:07:33 PM)



quote:

ORIGINAL: focalss


Here's one from another three page profile "Make no mistake, however; at the appropriate time you will have no doubt who is in command here." Here's free advice to you, if you have to tell people its not working.



Au contraire, mon frere. My two long-term submissive/life partners (together 13 and 14 years respectively and concurrently...that's right, a lovely V with me in the middle) would beg to differ with you. All three of us think it has been working beautifully for a very long time. Thus, the very first line in my profile highlighted and in bold: NOT LOOKING. Here for the boards.

My plate is full x 2, you STILL have nothing. I win.





Alecta -> RE: Secretary, assistant other skills for Mistresses (10/7/2012 1:28:15 PM)

aw you got my hopes up for nothing... I was hoping it was him explaining his accusations :/




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625