Oneechan
Posts: 50
Joined: 8/31/2012 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: descrite Harlan Ellison responds to all his fan mail. Piers Anthony does, too. Orson Scott Card employs someone to help him in the effort. I remember my little brother getting a signed photo from Barbara Feldon when we were kids. Well good for them. some people have the time and effort available to respond to lots of random people. Especially when they're rich celebrities who have something to gain in public image quote:
No disrespect intended, but are you saying that the person whose sole accomplishments are being subby and owning a twat is someone less obliged to respond to admirers? no not "less" obliged. Completely "not" obliged at all. Nobody is. unless someone is actually being paid to answer mail, nobody has an obligation to do it. And unlike the aforementioned rich celebrities, a private citizen who is here for the personal purpose of finding love, has no reason to respond to things they don't want to. quote:
I think you misunderstand the meaning of the word "entitlement." Someone who thinks so little of the admiration of others, Admiration may be given, and not accepted. It's not an essential thing, many people largely don't care about it. And to expect that people should be thankful because YOU deigned to take an interest in them, is arrogant. quote:
someone who expects the offers to continue pouring in, a reasonable expectation, because the offers do continue pouring in. One person being butthurt about not getting a reply does nothing to affect things/ quote:
even when they are negligently rude after having invited the attention, that is the person who has a sense of entitlement. having a line of communication open is not necessarily an entitlement. Do you invite salespeople by having a front door on your house, or a phone line? Most sane people who have a profile on a dating site will have written in it, some sort of criteria about who they are or what they're looking for. it's up to people with basic human intelligence to use that as a barometer of whether it's worth their time messaging. quote:
Another solution: include this on your profile-- "Sorry...I'm overwhelmed by messages at the moment, and I'm looking for something specific. If you're not [in the area/over 6'0"/hung like a musk ox], please don't send me a message right now." Then feel free to ignore the ones that don't meet the criteria and response anyway. At least then they'll have an idea why you ignored them. Fair? Another solution isn't needed. Someone can feel free to ignore messages without writing anything of the sort, and it's still perfectly fair. Someone's time and attention are their own, and you're just as free to not send messages, as someone is to not read them or not respond. if you voluntarily enter into communication by email you can't necessarily expect that the other will do likewise quote:
Who has so much attention that they can spurn some more? pretty much everyone who isn't a man, and certain men too. quote:
I have replied to every message anyone has ever sent me, here, FL, Facebook, OKCupid...be they attractive, in my region, or even the wrong gender. good for you that that's manageable. I stopped doing that when it started to feel like a job, that i wasn't getting paid for. quote:
I'm always flattered when someone has something nice to say about me, and took the time to tell me. perhaps because you don't hear it very often. I seem to get compliments everyday and i'm rarely flattered, usually because it's the same trite crap that plenty have tried before. tldr; stop whining
|