Aswad
Posts: 9374
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 You couldnt make it up could you. Simplicio seems to have had a rethink. Maybe. But, in all fairness, as I understand it, the underlying issue is a corruption scandal. One group of scientists made a prediction of a major quake based on their model. They were silenced due to concerns about tourism, and then another group was induced to put forth a prediction of no major quake. This second group would have had no good reason (in a scientific sense) to predict a major quake, but the allegation is that they put forth a prediction of one not occuring for reasons other than a scientific one. In short, two competing models were used, where one can't fault either of the models, nor fault people for preferring either model, but where there was a corrupt intent behind making a strong negative prediction, rather than the usual "nah, we don't think that's very likely" skepticism that attends any new theory. The theory that predicted the major quake isn't on solid ground (pun not intended), so the second group could have legitimately said that they didn't see a quake coming, but there being other influences involved means it's a question of whether they were unlawfully induced to go with another theory, or whether they were already convinced (with the corruption element thus being redundant and incidental, not causative, as to their predictions). If they chose a theory on the basis that it would support the view they were incentivized to hold, then I suppose a decent case could be made that they were indeed in dereliction of their duties, but the prosecution seems to have included that whole bit about accurate predictions. It may well be these guys should be locked up, just not for what they're being charged with. It's not implausible that the prosecutors might be setting this up for an appeal to carry the day due to the charges being unfounded (they are, as-is; we don't have a definitive predictive model for earthquakes), as a way to sidestep the real issue on which they could've been convicted. If so, then it's high politics as usual in Italy, with the prosecution effectively clearing their names and making them look like the victims of a gross miscarriage of justice (i.e. heroes by inversion), rather than being locked up somewhere. Wouldn't be the first time prosecutors in Italy were part of a corruption scandal in some way. Either way, a pretty creative thing they've got going here. IWYW, — Aswad.
< Message edited by Aswad -- 10/22/2012 5:00:34 PM >
_____________________________
"If God saw what any of us did that night, he didn't seem to mind. From then on I knew: God doesn't make the world this way. We do." -- Rorschack, Watchmen.
|