Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Guns


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Guns Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
[Poll]

Guns


There is too much regulation already.
  10% (28)
There should be far more stringent background checks.
  15% (39)
Reinstate the ban on assault guns.
  11% (29)
Make conceal and carry the law in all 50 states.
  10% (28)
Make gun classes mandatory.
  16% (42)
The only guns availible to the public should be hunting rifles.
  4% (12)
The 2nd amendment includes individuals owning firearms.
  21% (54)
The 2nd amendment does not include individuals, it's been distorted.
  3% (8)
I wish my country had gun laws similar to the US
  0% (1)
I don't want my country to have gun laws like the US
  6% (16)


Total Votes : 257


(last vote on : 2/2/2013 9:53:19 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 9:33:09 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

They should only be jailed if their lack if ethics results in breaking the law, of course.

As for results, I believe that if someone wants in that safe badly enough, then they'll do so. How much are you willing to legislate, for what you gain?

Anyway, I'm sure we'll get all this ironed out


If one life is spared, isnt that enough?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 9:35:39 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Awesome! Mandating more purchases! The Corporate Overlords will be happy.


You dont have to buy them.

quote:

What level of security is necessary, Tazzy? A gun safe? You'll mandate a gun safe? What happens if the gun safe is broken into?


Then you are not held liable.

quote:

What happens if the person is shot while getting the gun out of the safe, and now, the safe is open for the thief?


What happened to common sense? See my post to Aynne.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:09:51 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Awesome! Mandating more purchases! The Corporate Overlords will be happy.


You dont have to buy them.

quote:

What level of security is necessary, Tazzy? A gun safe? You'll mandate a gun safe? What happens if the gun safe is broken into?


Then you are not held liable.

quote:

What happens if the person is shot while getting the gun out of the safe, and now, the safe is open for the thief?


What happened to common sense? See my post to Aynne.

What if they steal the safe?

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:11:38 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
What if someone else gets to ask the next stupid question ?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:15:39 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

What if someone else gets to ask the next stupid question ?

That happened to someone in another thread. If he had to provide the broken into safe he would be up the creek.
So that wasn't a stupid question no matter how badly you want it to be.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:22:18 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

What if someone else gets to ask the next stupid question ?

That happened to someone in another thread. If he had to provide the broken into safe he would be up the creek.
So that wasn't a stupid question no matter how badly you want it to be.

sorry....still a stupid question.
I'm not even going to go to the trouble to explain to you why.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:29:09 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

What if someone else gets to ask the next stupid question ?

That happened to someone in another thread. If he had to provide the broken into safe he would be up the creek.
So that wasn't a stupid question no matter how badly you want it to be.

sorry....still a stupid question.
I'm not even going to go to the trouble to explain to you why.

Valid related to real event but you don't like it so it is stupid, if you say so.
No point in discussing anything further with you

< Message edited by BamaD -- 1/22/2013 10:34:32 PM >

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:39:46 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Works for me......I wasn't all that interested in talking to you anyway

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 10:50:37 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

Awesome! Mandating more purchases! The Corporate Overlords will be happy.


You dont have to buy them.

quote:

What level of security is necessary, Tazzy? A gun safe? You'll mandate a gun safe? What happens if the gun safe is broken into?


Then you are not held liable.

quote:

What happens if the person is shot while getting the gun out of the safe, and now, the safe is open for the thief?


What happened to common sense? See my post to Aynne.

What if they steal the safe?


1) I wasnt aware they were to easy to steal
2) You bought it, I am sure you can prove you had a safe, no?
3) If your safe is that.. cheap... that they can pick it up and tote it out the door, wasnt really a safe to begin with.. more like an excuse.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Guns - 1/22/2013 11:48:41 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
You have way more patience than I do......lol
Seriously,why go to the trouble when presented with such intellectual laziness ?

Don't bother Tazzy...I'm going to bed any way.....goodnight all.

< Message edited by slvemike4u -- 1/22/2013 11:49:16 PM >


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 3:47:45 AM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

They should only be jailed if their lack if ethics results in breaking the law, of course.

As for results, I believe that if someone wants in that safe badly enough, then they'll do so. How much are you willing to legislate, for what you gain?

Anyway, I'm sure we'll get all this ironed out


If one life is spared, isnt that enough?


As callous as it may sound, or be, I don't believe in going to any length for safety, especially potential safety.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 5:18:55 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level
They should only be jailed if their lack if ethics results in breaking the law, of course.
As for results, I believe that if someone wants in that safe badly enough, then they'll do so. How much are you willing to legislate, for what you gain?
Anyway, I'm sure we'll get all this ironed out

If one life is spared, isnt that enough?


No, it is not enough. If you are going to use the "one life spared" criterion, you will be outlawing cars, bicycles, knives, big rocks, cap guns, hot dogs, marshmallows, etc.

You never answered my question, tazzy. What level of security will be required so that one wouldn't be held liable when one's guns are stolen?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 6:53:26 AM   
EsotericLady


Posts: 713
Joined: 1/2/2013
Status: offline
I listened in horror on the radio yesterday when a police officer in my state said there were no specific laws as yet
to put restrictions on those with mental health issues from owning a gun.

He noted a case where, in doing a background check and finding the potential permit holder to have made multiple suicide attempts in the past, he still had to allow that person a permit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

3) More Stringent Background checks - Again as a gun owner I have supported this as well. The other side is that mental health issues need to be a part of the check.



(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 9:51:14 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

No, it is not enough. If you are going to use the "one life spared" criterion, you will be outlawing cars, bicycles, knives, big rocks, cap guns, hot dogs, marshmallows, etc.


Drunk driving deaths have been cut in half. We have used it.

quote:

You never answered my question, tazzy. What level of security will be required so that one wouldn't be held liable when one's guns are stolen?


I have answered it.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 9:51:22 AM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Due to lawsuits about privacy, people raising hell about privacy, and a few other things, many state and even the fed government have had problems in the past collecting the data and making it available.

Sorry but if someone is determined to be a possible risk to themselves and others, that right to privacy thing should give way to the general welfare of the people.

Gun control happens on a state level, and that means there will also be some backroom deals to clean someone's record up of the smaller things, so they can get a CCW. I know of someone right now that had 2 DUI's, and a Domestic Violence arrest sealed or removed from their record so they could get a CCW. The exceptions may happen, but we can still target the larger areas that should be a concern to all.


quote:

ORIGINAL: EsotericLady

I listened in horror on the radio yesterday when a police officer in my state said there were no specific laws as yet
to put restrictions on those with mental health issues from owning a gun.

He noted a case where, in doing a background check and finding the potential permit holder to have made multiple suicide attempts in the past, he still had to allow that person a permit.

quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

3) More Stringent Background checks - Again as a gun owner I have supported this as well. The other side is that mental health issues need to be a part of the check.






_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to EsotericLady)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 10:24:59 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

No, it is not enough. If you are going to use the "one life spared" criterion, you will be outlawing cars, bicycles, knives, big rocks, cap guns, hot dogs, marshmallows, etc.

Drunk driving deaths have been cut in half. We have used it.
quote:

You never answered my question, tazzy. What level of security will be required so that one wouldn't be held liable when one's guns are stolen?

I have answered it.


Why haven't we used it in cases other than drunk driving? How many deaths are caused by vehicle where the driver wasn't drunk?

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 10:43:49 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Why haven't we used it in cases other than drunk driving? How many deaths are caused by vehicle where the driver wasn't drunk?


You know how to google, yes?

You keep bringing up vehicles. Yet you cannot address the thread.. which is labeled... guns.

Everything has the potential to kill. Minimizing risks are the best we can do. Demanding gun owners be responsible owners is just one way to minimize risks. Like mandatory seat belt laws.

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 1/23/2013 10:44:04 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 11:33:46 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: uglycowwanted

I ticked the 'I don't want gun laws like the US' and I notice no one has ticked that they would. To be honest most of the Western world is amazed that America still allows guns to be so freely available. We can understand why they are in the Third World because desperate people living in poverty and without any significant law enforcement need them, but not in the West.

Clearly most gun laws in America are based in the frontier mentality of fighting to take control of an untamed land, but that was a long time now, and the World has changed. The reason America has far more shootings than other countries is not because it has any more lunatics than anywhere else, it's just that those that do can get access to guns.

I suppose the school shootings lead to a simple question, what does America love most, it's kids or it's guns? The answer appears to be the latter, and it is this the rest of the World finds hard to understand.


This....so much this.

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to uglycowwanted)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 11:50:24 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
quote:

Why haven't we used it in cases other than drunk driving? How many deaths are caused by vehicle where the driver wasn't drunk?

You know how to google, yes?
You keep bringing up vehicles. Yet you cannot address the thread.. which is labeled... guns.
Everything has the potential to kill. Minimizing risks are the best we can do. Demanding gun owners be responsible owners is just one way to minimize risks. Like mandatory seat belt laws.


I'm sorry you can't recognize "governmental legislation creep" when it's staring you in the face.

I don't have a problem with making gun owners responsible for the security of their guns, as an idea. The particulars of that, though, is where the issue will be.

The "if one life is spared" line is bullshit. You know it. You can't handle someone bringing up all sorts of reasons where that kind of thinking can lead you. Then, it's back to "stick to the topic" bullshit.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Guns - 1/23/2013 12:02:49 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

I'm sorry you can't recognize "governmental legislation creep" when it's staring you in the face.

I don't have a problem with making gun owners responsible for the security of their guns, as an idea. The particulars of that, though, is where the issue will be.

The "if one life is spared" line is bullshit. You know it. You can't handle someone bringing up all sorts of reasons where that kind of thinking can lead you. Then, it's back to "stick to the topic" bullshit.


No, what I find bullshit is a gun owner who whines and cries because he cant think.

I have seen some of the stupidest questions here.

"What if I need to grab a gun and Im asleep and someone breaks into my house?"

"What if my safe gets stolen?"

"What if someone pisses on my leg and it pisses me off?"

All extremely piss poor excuses to avoid the conversation.

Be honest. There isnt a single one of you that wants to put out the money you could be spending on another gun into protecting yourself, and your community, from a stolen weapon.

There isnt any of you who see any merit to demanding owners be responsible by installing security measures.

A gun show, Medina, Ohio, a vendor buys a gun from a seller... he notices there is a bullet in the chamber.. he goes to clear it.. it goes off. Purely accidental. Someone else is shot in the groin... poor fella.

How many of the gun owners here would take a loaded gun to a gun show to sell?

This was NOT a responsible gun owner. 7 accidental shootings at gun shows that day.

Yet you all trust them to handle their weapons.

Are you freaking nuts?

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 1/23/2013 12:03:55 PM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Guns Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.102