Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/wed-april-24-2013-bassem-youssef
jon at his best, with clips of fox doing what they do best
Wanting to Toss Every Amendment Except Second!!!
For people who claim to love the constitution, Fox News pundits sure seem to be hemorrhaging amendments according to Jon Stewart. On Wednesday night, he took the network to serious task for its emotional and math-challenged reaction to the Boston bombing and the handling of Dzokhar Tsarnaev in the days since his arrest.
Also Check out the Jon Olivers trip to Oz, to check out their gun control...
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/thu-april-25-2013-vali-nasr
I liked the footnote.
Would have preferred to have seen longer clips so we could gain context, but that may or may not have changed a damn thing.
It has been shown on this board that Miranda can be suspended, for public safety. And, that seems to be what Brian Kelly was talking about. So, not really against his Constitutional right.
The rest may be Constitutional in the same way, except for Coulter's assertions. Beckel's idea of barring all Muslims entry for now isn't contrary to the 1st amendment. Not letting in Muslim students isn't preventing them from freely exercising their religion, nor is it establishing a national religion. Beckel went on further (as heard on a local news talk radio afternoon show) and stated that he wasn't saying to get rid of Muslim students who are already here, but to temporarily prevent any more.
Just so I am clear, I am not in favor of preventing any race, ethnicity, or religious affiliation from entering the country. I am completely against allowing aspiring terrorists to enter the country. And, I don't think there is any specific question on the student visa application. I think it's high time we changed that... 
you know you all quote the federal constitution while your state constitution strips you of the rights you think and claim you have. yeh if you can do a title 42 case maybe.
What you miss completely is:
quote:
Rights of conscience; educatIon; the necessity of relIgion and knowledge
§7 All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty
God according to the dictates of their own conscience.
you do NOT have the right to freely exercize your religion in Ohio,
you have the right to PRAY nothing more!
Likewise you have no unalienable rights recognized by your state, only inalienable rights.
and the only reason you have that r4ight is that they cant stop you from praying anyway!
LMAO
but dont feel bad, wisconsin only allows you to pray too,
and minnysota
quote:
Sec. 16. Freedom of conscience; no preference to be given to any religious establishment or mode of worship.
The enumeration of rights in this constitution shall not deny or impair others retained by and inherent in the people. The right of every man to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience shall never be infringed;
ha now california was a little more sneaky about it
quote:
Sec. 4. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be guaranteed in this State;
the freedom to be a minister LOL
fucking hilarious anyway I am not going to post every state, this is enough to get the point across, you have no unalienable rights and you have no right to EXERCISE YOUR RELIGION
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 4/26/2013 8:47:40 PM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile
Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?
Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|
Fox News Shreds The Constitution - 
Profile
RE: Fox News Shreds The Constitution - 
Poking at beck is always a hoot.
.gif){kind=avatar}
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread