|
Yachtie -> RE: "Obama the Amateur" Part II (6/4/2013 5:53:08 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
quote:
ORIGINAL: Yachtie
I doubt you'd recognize a valid argument.
Of course I'm anti-Obama, otherwise I'd be pro-Obama. The man is a joke. Which is a good reason liberals don't get it.
Neutrality doesn't exist? Interesting.
You say the man is a joke. What does that say about the candidates he thrashed?
They lost, else I'd say the same about them (excepting Ron Paul).
Look, Bush sucked and you all love to point that out and keep pointing it out. But do you harangue on Obama? Absolutely not. One would think he's the second coming. Obama is the quintessential liberal front-man. He fits the social welfare leftist mantra almost perfectly. It's always the righties that are holding back his progressive goals. It's always Bush's fault.
The goals and methods of the left are easily recognized and the left has done a superb job at actually silencing the right's rhetoric. Criticize Obama and one is declared I.e. Raciss, no matter the criticism was of policy.
As a rightie I've admitted that "I miss Bill" in comparison to what we have had since. It's hysterical that I've been trashed for my support of Alan Keyes, a black man, based on his policies while now being told I'm Raciss because I question Obama's policies. But I understand the nature of the game.
The lefts mantra is unceasing, like waves upon the rocks slowly pounding away making sand.
All in all, I question what this all says about the left. I know what the neo-right is. So do you. I also know what the neo-left is. You either do and approve, which I believe is the case, or you don't which is symptomatic of political blindness. It's interesting how much of neo-republican policy Obama seemingly supports.
No, neutrality does not exist. At least in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
