RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN

RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

SadistDave -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/3/2014 1:42:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun The gun in the position that George carried it is quite easy to pull while on the ground, and the forensics showed that Trayvon was on top of George on the ground when the gun was fired. And even if Martin couldn't get the gun that doesn't prove that Zimmerman didn't think he was trying to. Zimmerman was acquitted almost 2 years ago, get over it. Zimmerman claimed that Martin saw the gun and they struggled for it. Simply impossible since if Zimmerman was telling the truth it was under his body The fact is Zimmerman lied about what happened. You do know the trial is over don't you? So what...... Zimmerman still lied. Although I guess you support OJ Simpson because the trial is over. [8\|] Just for clarification, do you mean "support" in the same way that you support people who support car bombers? -SD-

Politesub53 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/3/2014 3:57:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave Just for clarification, do you mean "support" in the same way that you support people who support car bombers? -SD- Just for your clarification, not that it needs it, you are talking bollocks. You are still pissed because I pointed out you had posted a racist song, but lying wont win you any friends.

Raiikun -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/3/2014 5:56:25 AM)
Meanwhile, George's legal team is appealing Nelson's ruling, and seems quite confident of it being overruled. (The 5th DCA didn't hesitate to overrule her the last time George's team had to appeal one of her screw-ups.) Beasley pointed out that NBC's error was so grave that it led to the firing of two staffers, and that most libel cases like this are 15 rounders.

BamaD -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/3/2014 12:34:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: DomKen quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun The gun in the position that George carried it is quite easy to pull while on the ground, and the forensics showed that Trayvon was on top of George on the ground when the gun was fired. And even if Martin couldn't get the gun that doesn't prove that Zimmerman didn't think he was trying to. Zimmerman was acquitted almost 2 years ago, get over it. Zimmerman claimed that Martin saw the gun and they struggled for it. Simply impossible since if Zimmerman was telling the truth it was under his body The fact is Zimmerman lied about what happened. You do know the trial is over don't you? So what...... Zimmerman still lied. Although I guess you support OJ Simpson because the trial is over. [8\|] Just for clarification, do you mean "support" in the same way that you support people who support car bombers? -SD- I didn't see this when posted, I guess he missed two things. A OJ lost in a case that ruled he was responsible for the deaths. B OJ's book, which was a virtual confession rubbing the fact that he got away with it in everyone's collective noses. C When OJ beat the rap I didn't keep trying to prove he was guilty.

SadistDave -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/4/2014 2:36:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave Just for clarification, do you mean "support" in the same way that you support people who support car bombers? -SD- Just for your clarification, not that it needs it, you are talking bollocks. You are still pissed because I pointed out you had posted a racist song, but lying wont win you any friends. ROFLMAO Would that be the non-existant racist song you lied about finding on a nazi website? Actually, I laughed my ass off because you not only got busted in your lie, you kept insisting that you weren't lying when anyone who can read knows you were absolutely full of shit. Your continued denials about that whole thing just make it funnier. And now you're going to deny that you were defending a woman who supported a guy who tried to build a car bomb? I don't know why you think I'd be upset about anything you say, unless you suffer from some sort of bizarre narcissistic psychosis. You're a joke that never stops making me laugh, lol. -SD-

Sanity -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/4/2014 10:58:57 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun Meanwhile, George's legal team is appealing Nelson's ruling, and seems quite confident of it being overruled. (The 5th DCA didn't hesitate to overrule her the last time George's team had to appeal one of her screw-ups.) Beasley pointed out that NBC's error was so grave that it led to the firing of two staffers, and that most libel cases like this are 15 rounders. NBC is almost as biased as the BBC is Remember Dan Rather lying about W, and being forced to resign in order to save what tiny credibility was "left" for the far left network?

Politesub53 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/4/2014 11:38:33 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SadistDave ROFLMAO Would that be the non-existant racist song you lied about finding on a nazi website? Actually, I laughed my ass off because you not only got busted in your lie, you kept insisting that you weren't lying when anyone who can read knows you were absolutely full of shit. Your continued denials about that whole thing just make it funnier. And now you're going to deny that you were defending a woman who supported a guy who tried to build a car bomb? I don't know why you think I'd be upset about anything you say, unless you suffer from some sort of bizarre narcissistic psychosis. You're a joke that never stops making me laugh, lol. -SD- Still lying as usual dave ? Thats fine by me but dont expect a free pass. [8\|]

DomKen -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/4/2014 12:04:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun Meanwhile, George's legal team is appealing Nelson's ruling, and seems quite confident of it being overruled. (The 5th DCA didn't hesitate to overrule her the last time George's team had to appeal one of her screw-ups.) Beasley pointed out that NBC's error was so grave that it led to the firing of two staffers, and that most libel cases like this are 15 rounders. NBC is almost as biased as the BBC is Remember Dan Rather lying about W, and being forced to resign in order to save what tiny credibility was "left" for the far left network? And what has that got to do with either BBC or NBC?

joether -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/4/2014 12:15:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Sanity quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun Meanwhile, George's legal team is appealing Nelson's ruling, and seems quite confident of it being overruled. (The 5th DCA didn't hesitate to overrule her the last time George's team had to appeal one of her screw-ups.) Beasley pointed out that NBC's error was so grave that it led to the firing of two staffers, and that most libel cases like this are 15 rounders. NBC is almost as biased as the BBC is Remember Dan Rather lying about W, and being forced to resign in order to save what tiny credibility was "left" for the far left network? When your a journalist, you have to be responsible with what you say, print, and design. Now, if those on FOX News had to live up to the same standard.... ...they would be fired almost instantly! That should tell anyone the standards of journalism that exist in NBC and FOX News.

Sanity -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/4/2014 12:16:49 PM)
Wait, you may be correct, he was on that other far left broadcast network... There are only three of them. How could I have gotten that one wrong

thompsonx -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/6/2014 2:13:18 PM)
ORIGINAL: Sanity Remember Dan Rather lying about W, and being forced to resign in order to save what tiny credibility was "left" for the far left network? That only happened in your head. If you could link us to some source ,that is not just inside your head, that will validate that rather lied about w we would all like to see it. But since you cant we can just call you a fucking liar now.

Raiikun -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/9/2014 7:41:37 AM)
It wasn't in Sanity's head; it's a well known incident. Of course though, that incident makes a wonderful litmus test; on one side there are those that believe Rather was implicit in an attempt to deceive (and there's legitimate reason for the belief), and those that don't (with reasons that can be used to explain that as well.) But calling someone a "fucking liar" for having a different opinion on a widely known event is a pretty lame tactic that does nothing to promote intellectual discourse. (But of course, this particular forum is not the place to go to for intellectual discourse so I s'pose it fits right in.)

Mouth4Mistress -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/9/2014 10:35:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Sanity Remember Dan Rather lying about W, and being forced to resign in order to save what tiny credibility was "left" for the far left network? That only happened in your head. If you could link us to some source ,that is not just inside your head, that will validate that rather lied about w we would all like to see it. But since you cant we can just call you a fucking liar now. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=dan%20rather%20scandal&safe=off Ta-motherfucking-daaaah! Over 1 million results for "Dan Rather scandal". Enough material?

BamaD -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/9/2014 12:17:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Raiikun It wasn't in Sanity's head; it's a well known incident. Of course though, that incident makes a wonderful litmus test; on one side there are those that believe Rather was implicit in an attempt to deceive (and there's legitimate reason for the belief), and those that don't (with reasons that can be used to explain that as well.) But calling someone a "fucking liar" for having a different opinion on a widely known event is a pretty lame tactic that does nothing to promote intellectual discourse. (But of course, this particular forum is not the place to go to for intellectual discourse so I s'pose it fits right in.) Rather did stand by the report even though it was based on poorly forged documents because even though there was no longer any proof he said he still believed the charges. Personally I believe that he wanted to believe them so bad he allowed himself to be duped. I don't know exactly where that puts me in your ranking of views on this.

thompsonx -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/10/2014 5:59:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Mouth4Mistress quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Sanity Remember Dan Rather lying about W, and being forced to resign in order to save what tiny credibility was "left" for the far left network? That only happened in your head. If you could link us to some source ,that is not just inside your head, that will validate that rather lied about w we would all like to see it. But since you cant we can just call you a fucking liar now. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=dan%20rather%20scandal&safe=off Ta-motherfucking-daaaah! Over 1 million results for "Dan Rather scandal". Enough material? Why don't you put your google findings in the same place you have your ta-motherfucking-daaaaah stored and answer the mother fucking question. Until you have acquainted yourself with the facts and not the fiction you wish to believe you will forever be just another fucking moron who chooses not to actually deal with facts. So once you have done a little research (you know all that google shit you are so proud about)and found out how fucking mindnumbingly stupid your post is, get back to us.

thompsonx -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/10/2014 6:07:54 PM)
ORIGINAL: Raiikun It wasn't in Sanity's head; Yes it is. it's a well known incident. The incident is well known. Rather was not fired/retired because he lied or made an attempt to lie. Of course though, that incident makes a wonderful litmus test; on one side there are those that believe Rather was implicit Complicit is the word you are looking for here. in an attempt to deceive (and there's legitimate reason for the belief), It would be nice if you could produce such. and those that don't (with reasons that can be used to explain that as well.) But calling someone a "fucking liar" for having a different opinion on a widely known event is a pretty lame tactic that does nothing to promote intellectual discourse. Perhaps you are not aware of the facts of the incident. Perhaps if people were to actually look at the incident itself and all of it's aspects they would not make foolish statements. In the mater of my post. I was responding to a blatant lie not a "difference of opinion" (But of course, this particular forum is not the place to go to for intellectual discourse so I s'pose it fits right in.) This is the perfect place for intellectual discourse but you are well aware that some are not equipped to do so. So they post up rhetoric about how bad the other side is without ever making a specific claim.

thompsonx -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (7/10/2014 6:14:32 PM)
dp

Politesub53 -> RE: UNMODERATED ZIMMERMAN (4/8/2015 5:28:11 AM)
Wrong thread.

Page: << < prev 171 172 173 174 [175]

Collarchat.com © 2024

Terms of Service

0.4042969