RE: Nothing better to do (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


ShaharThorne -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:24:04 PM)

Hehehe...considering that you probably have a mouth that makes a Switch such as myself cringe, I know a few Doms who would LOVE to use a dragonstail on you just so you would learn a few lessons.

Besides, you probably got a few STDs...




Rawni -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:25:04 PM)

What he got was a spam filter in ONE day. [:D] That's talent.




metamorfosis -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:26:56 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow
My insinuation that it is malfunctioning is because a simple google search revealed multiple members of this site (attractive women included) who ran into the same problem.


By extension, the whole penal system must be malfunctioning because a simple google search is sure to reveal multiple convicts (attractive women included) who say they didn't do it. There can be no other explanation than that the police are at fault.

Pam




ShaharThorne -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:27:02 PM)

I know...got a few subs do that on me a few times. They just don't know how to read...or write...




TeeJayFlow -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:27:41 PM)

I can't tell if I'm on collarchat or 4chan based on your ignorance... Yes, true ferocity. There's quite a difference between criticism and rage, if you don't know the difference, the failure of logic is on your part.




dcnovice -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:29:20 PM)

quote:

My insinuation that it is malfunctioning is because a simple google search revealed multiple members of this site (attractive women included) who ran into the same problem.

I'm curious: What were the search terms that yielded this result?




TeeJayFlow -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:30:16 PM)

Oh? Did I hit a nerve? No, actually I'm 100% clean of STDs, thanks for the concern though.

I think you're a switch because choosing one side or the other is significantly difficult to you finding someone willing to even look at you, much less respond.




AthenaSurrenders -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:34:50 PM)

Fast reply

This is one of those threads we should bookmark and dredge up when someone asks why young dominants have a hard time being taken seriously. The personal remarks about people's bodies and age are shallow and immature. It gives other young dominants a bad name.




ShaharThorne -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:35:02 PM)

I am a switch because I choose to be. As for the STDs, you're the one suggesting the flame sanitized 10 foot pole. I choose not to be in a relationship due to family obligations. That is something that you probably have no idea what they are...




metamorfosis -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:35:36 PM)

FR

You're obviously here just to stir the pot but, as you see, many of us have nothing better to do either.

Pam




ShaharThorne -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:39:13 PM)

Just defending the switch...and I dislike young doms triggering the filters.




metamorfosis -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:40:04 PM)

No, it was a fast reply.

pam




DarkSteven -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:40:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow

So doms are supposed to take on the subservient attitude of winning over people with essays? Such hypocrisy.


Nope, we're supposed to use common courtesy.

Look, you're new to the game and still trying to see where you fit in. Well and good. But You need to respect other people.

Also, you seem to think that your opinion is the only one that matters. The spam filter responds to everyone else, and in that case them feeling that you're spamming them is the reason for the block.


quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow

My insinuation that it is malfunctioning is because a simple google search revealed multiple members of this site (attractive women included) who ran into the same problem.



They likely did the exact same thing, sending out impersonalized messages at high volume. Whether they're attractive women or not is irrevelant.




angelikaJ -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 1:45:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow


quote:

ORIGINAL: Killerangel


quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow

]I can't write a sample letter when it isn't directed towards a specific person, as it is quite a subjective thing don't you think?


As far as I know you hit the spam filter by:
A. Sending out many identical type messages in a short time spam.
B. People report your messages as spam.

It can be all A or all B or a bit of both.

This is what the site calls spam, it doesn't matter if your definition is different.
It always makes me laugh that people say the spam filter is "malfunctioning" when it applies to themselves- i.e. your comment on the 'popular problem here'.

Whatever you are putting in your emails is seemingly causing some people to report you as spam, or the messages are identical and being mass mailed, so it doesn't seem as though you are writing individual, subjective, personalized messages contrary to your claim above.


My insinuation that it is malfunctioning is because a simple google search revealed multiple members of this site (attractive women included) who ran into the same problem.


So for some reason, you personally believe that attractive women wouldn't be sending out mass-messages that might cause the recipient to flag the message as spam?

A wee hint: that happens all the time.
Quite often when a savvy member does an image search, they learn that said attractive woman is using a stolen image of some porn star.

In the meantime, you have had some people give you helpful suggestions.

Your responses have been rude no matter what the replies have been.

Being a dominant male does not mean one is an asshole.
(Please note: I did not just call you an asshole; I just stated that being an asshole is not a dominant trait. However, oddly enough, some people do tend to strongly equate rudeness with assholish-ness.)

Anyone who goes to your profile will now be able to see your posting history and may decide whether an unsolicited email from you fits their personal criteria for Spam.
For some people, not being what they are personally looking for is all it takes.
And... rudeness and posturing are quite frequently given as turn-offs when threads discuss such.

Oh, and [sm=welcomewave.gif] to CollarMe.


edit: typo x2





ShaharThorne -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 2:06:35 PM)

My apologies, Pam...

Anyone got a sub handy? Dishes need to be done after I cook supper and I did laundry today.




TeeJayFlow -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 2:31:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow


quote:

ORIGINAL: Killerangel


quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow

]I can't write a sample letter when it isn't directed towards a specific person, as it is quite a subjective thing don't you think?


As far as I know you hit the spam filter by:
A. Sending out many identical type messages in a short time spam.
B. People report your messages as spam.

It can be all A or all B or a bit of both.

This is what the site calls spam, it doesn't matter if your definition is different.
It always makes me laugh that people say the spam filter is "malfunctioning" when it applies to themselves- i.e. your comment on the 'popular problem here'.

Whatever you are putting in your emails is seemingly causing some people to report you as spam, or the messages are identical and being mass mailed, so it doesn't seem as though you are writing individual, subjective, personalized messages contrary to your claim above.


My insinuation that it is malfunctioning is because a simple google search revealed multiple members of this site (attractive women included) who ran into the same problem.


So for some reason, you personally believe that attractive women wouldn't be sending out mass-messages that might cause the recipient to flag the message as spam?

A wee hint: that happens all the time.
Quite often when a savvy member does an image search, they learn that said attractive woman is using a stolen image of some porn star.

In the meantime, you have had some people give you helpful suggestions.

Your responses have been rude no matter what the replies have been.

Being a dominant male does not mean one is an asshole.
(Please note: I did not just call you an asshole; I just stated that being an asshole is not a dominant trait. However, oddly enough, some people do tend to strongly equate rudeness with assholish-ness.)

Anyone who goes to your profile will now be able to see your posting history and may decide whether an unsolicited email from you fits their personal criteria for Spam.
For some people, not being what they are personally looking for is all it takes.
And... rudeness and posturing are quite frequently given as turn-offs when threads discuss such.

Oh, and [sm=welcomewave.gif] to CollarMe.


edit: typo x2




Well I meet fire with fire, so if someone is being abrasive towards me they can expect it back. I don't like assholes neither.

I don't personally believe that attractive women don't do that kind of thing but there is a stigma that attractive women don't do things like that.

I don't need or invite ignorant criticism from Alpha Females, especially ones that think I would want anything to do with them (which a number of them have insinuated)

If criticism is constructive and educational, that is welcome, but thus far I've only been flamed by old hags and obese sociopaths.

You can't call me out on my behavior when you're ignoring the fact that people are degrading me with their delusional superiority complex.

I thank you for your input.




LittleGirlHeart -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 2:44:28 PM)

I think you may be mistaken about what a Mistress is. She typically isn't going to be interested in a Dominant, or any one controlling her. Unless she is a switch, who submits to you and doms others.



quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeJayFlow



Hate to tell you, DesFIP, if I control the mistress then I AM dominant.





TeeJayFlow -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 2:54:13 PM)

You hit the nail on the head




LadyPact -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 3:23:37 PM)

Well, since *everyone* was an old hag or whatever, here's another two cents.

No, the spam filter isn't malfunctioning. Whatever search you did doesn't tell you what anybody else did to trigger it. If I started a new account with a stolen pic of a 21 year old model and sent out twenty messages to say hi and pay tribute, I'd get hit by the spam filter, too. You're either triggering frequency, generic messages, or people are reporting the messages that you have sent as spam. Perhaps, it's a combination of all three. However, that is exactly what the system is designed to do, so that means it's working precisely the way that it's supposed to.

Nobody has to read your profile to answer a simple question about the spam filter. The thing has been active on this site for about three years now and most of the folks familiar with the forums are used to people jumping over here to say that they triggered it. Do you want to know what every person who has complained about it had in common? They were all sending out a bunch of generic mail and/or mail that the other parties didn't want to receive. To date, nobody coming on the forums to complain about it has been able to honestly deny that they weren't doing the things the spam filter is in place to prevent.

I didn't read your profile but *if* you are mailing Dominant women and you have labeled yourself as a Dominant, a high number of those women are going to hit that nice "mark as spam and delete" button that the site provides. Most Dominant women are not interested in Dominant men and the ones that come along hoping we'll switch because they think they are the Domly Dom of the universe are generally pests. This can be especially true if they are younger and haven't gotten their feet wet yet.

By the way, the way you have reacted on this thread is exactly why many of the women just mark unwanted mail with the "mark as spam and delete" button, rather than sending a reply back. You may be sending nice emails to those that you want to hook up with, but those of us who have been here for a while know that any reply given to say we're not interested is met with rudeness, so we don't bother. It's the exact reaction that's been on this thread that prompts all of the questions on the forums about why women don't answer mail and why those who have experience in BDSM won't give somebody on the internet a chance.

You probably won't like any of what I've said here, so please feel free to lash out with the comments about how I'm old, fat, or don't know what I'm talking about. That last part always works when people who don't have information/knowledge don't like the answers from those that do. [8|]




MissKittyDeVine -> RE: Nothing better to do (7/20/2013 3:25:42 PM)

A 19 year old knowitall "Dom" hanging around on his own thread to pounce on each and every comments is even better than a flounce thread.

Industrial- sized bucket of popcorn, anyone?




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875