RE: For shame...

Join Our Community

Collarchat.com

Home Login Search

RE: For shame...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: For shame...

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 7:31:25 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
Why? He said the voting shows it, it does not. You know what monolithic means.

I look forward to your application of the same standard when you accuse a group that is made up of many sub-groups/factions of anything. I'm also looking forward to your demanding that same standard of anyone making similar generalities.

You don't have to get defensive about it, MN. I'm just looking forward to consistency, as should you.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 7:39:02 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

I am not defensive, as everyone else, I am pushing my point of view, it neither has to be consistent, nor anything else.

I will do what I do, and most of you all will do what you want to do, I shouldn't do shit.

There are rarely any sort of credible citations that come from the opposite side of the aisle (although that is a little incorrect in my case, since it wouldn't really be my opposite side, just is in the current configuration, since I am not a democrat by any stretch but they are a little more centrist than the yodelers on the right nowadays)

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 7:47:13 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I am not defensive, as everyone else, I am pushing my point of view, it neither has to be consistent, nor anything else.
I will do what I do, and most of you all will do what you want to do, I shouldn't do shit.
There are rarely any sort of credible citations that come from the opposite side of the aisle (although that is a little incorrect in my case, since it wouldn't really be my opposite side, just is in the current configuration, since I am not a democrat by any stretch but they are a little more centrist than the yodelers on the right nowadays)

"Credible citations"

"... I want 100% something for some reason."

You want the opportunity to be inconsistent. I'm sure application won't have anything to do with your ideology.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 7:58:26 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

and yours.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 8:11:55 AM

VideoAdminChi

Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline

Alrighty then, reminder to discuss POSTS not POSTERS.

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 8:20:58 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
and yours.

Feel free (not that I doubted you wouldn't without my blessing (dammit, this just got religious

)) to call me out on that.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to mnottertail)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 8:22:12 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi
Alrighty then, reminder to discuss POSTS not POSTERS.

Sorry. Posted while you posted this.

_____________________________

What I support:

A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
Personal Responsibility
Help for the truly needy
Limited Government
Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to VideoAdminChi)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 8:22:16 AM

mnottertail

Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

I do constantly, so, along with the OP and the intervening spinners, was this thread a fuckin dud or what?

I vote useless dud.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30

(in reply to DesideriScuri)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: For shame... - 8/29/2013 8:24:51 AM

DesideriScuri

Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail
I do constantly, so, along with the OP and the intervening spinners, was this thread a fuckin dud or what?
I vote useless dud.

Constantly? Hardly.

Yes, a complete dud.

29 posts (including this one) and 10 of them are us discussing consistency (and getting a gentle reminder from Chi).

_____________________________

What I support: