RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons

RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:04:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah, ZeroHedge...............FLUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! he is painting himself in a corner........isn't he always, because there is an end goal to be accomplished. Not like the house who is drowning in the middle of the ocean with fiscal responsibility, massive defense appropriations (that we obviously are not needing) a debt ceiling and bankruptcy being kicked down the road again........... This is about Syria. And why the ZH flush????????? It's only a Rice Tweet or what ever being reported.... You again berate the messenger. I will give you kudos in your consistency. [;)]

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:13:27 PM)
When the messenger has been shown to consistently alter the message............then it is FLUSH. Well, painting in Syria then. Lets leave Obama out of it.

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:25:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Well, painting in Syria then. Lets leave Obama out of it. How? He's in the thick of it. Or maybe he'll throw Rice under the bus for unsanctioned tweeting.

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:27:45 PM)
Congressional vote on Syria, congress is dead center. We dont know that Rice tweeted that, and we dont know what it means, because only ZeroHedge is the messenger, and they aren't very good at transcription.

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:31:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail We dont know that Rice tweeted that, and we dont know what it means, because only ZeroHedge is the messenger, and they aren't very good at transcription. What transcription? The link was right there had you bothered to even look. Here, let me spoon feed you. https://twitter.com/WHLive/statuses/377121102507433984

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:34:49 PM)
Well it wasnt on your ZH thing, that was a blank page. And what is wrong with that? There is nothing that is untoward there, nor nothing that is diametrically opposed to what Obama said, regarding the goals of a strike. If you are going to traffic in the English language, know the difference between a regime and President. You want somebody other than a democrat to be president but you ain't looking to change the regime. NObody but nutsuckers hallucinate that we can bring democracy to the middle east. It's pretty obvious, you don't get the message.

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:52:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Well it wasnt on your ZH thing, that was a blank page. ... And what is wrong with that? There is nothing that is untoward there, I messed up a link. Happens. Can't edit it now. No matter. You have it now anyway. ... nor nothing that is diametrically opposed to what Obama said Carney on regime change.... or perhaps this - US forces readied to strike Syria on Tuesday, as the West insisted its goal was not regime change but to punish the Assad government for unleashing chemical warfare on civilians.

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:55:34 PM)
Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:57:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top. Thank God the guy at the top has nothing to do with the regime in power... [8\|]

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:57:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top. Yeah? In Assad's case,,, lose Assad and then what? I'm sure the rebels wish to continue Assad's benevolent policies [;)] edit: I guess Obama was against it before he was for it... now, where have I heard that before?

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 12:59:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top. Thank God the guy at the top has nothing to do with the regime in power... [8\|] He doesn't. That is why we, by example have a legislature.

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:01:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Yachtie quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top. Yeah? In Assad's case,,, lose Assad and then what? I'm sure the rebels wish to continue Assad's benevolent policies [;)] Losing Assad does not install the rebels (a rather scurvy bunch themselves.) No more than losing Bush has lost the nutsuckers. You can better believe the administrations in those places don't sneeze unless the military and the princes and caliphs formally agree.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:01:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top. Thank God the guy at the top has nothing to do with the regime in power... [8\|] He doesn't. That is why we, by example have a legislature. Assad has nothing to do with the ruling regime in Syria?!?!? Then, why are we even talking about removing him from power? What would the point be in removing a guy that doesn't have anything to do with the regime in power?

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:03:41 PM)
Assad is not the system of government. Would you say that Obama is the system of government? Exactly what the fuck form and policy of the Syrian government do you believe was different than now? Not looking to replace the government or the forms of government, just the President.

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:05:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Yeah? Why dig yourself a bigger hole than you are in? Here, let me spoon feed you: a mode or system of rule or government: a dictatorial regime. a ruling or prevailing system. a government in power. the period during which a particular government or ruling system is in power. Nobody is looking to change the regime as in Iraq with the nutsuckers, only the man at the top. Thank God the guy at the top has nothing to do with the regime in power... [8\|] He doesn't. That is why we, by example have a legislature. [sm=ofcourse.gif]

Yachtie -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:07:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Assad is not the system of government. Would you say that Obama is the system of government? Exactly what the fuck form and policy of the Syrian government do you believe was different than now? Not looking to replace the government or the forms of government, just the President. [sm=popcorn.gif]

DesideriScuri -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:14:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Assad is not the system of government. Would you say that Obama is the system of government? Exactly what the fuck form and policy of the Syrian government do you believe was different than now? Not looking to replace the government or the forms of government, just the President. Guess the buck don't stop there, eh? Remove the dictator from a dictatorial regime and you end up with... ?

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:19:25 PM)
That would be Libya, this is Syria. Look, the only way to spin bullshit is misuse the English language and twist meanings, but it is foolish. Neither of you have said you are sheep fuckers, or have you? In any case I don't believe it, you can't twist it enough to make me believe it, if you could you would have solved the debt crisis back in St. Wrinklemeats time.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:24:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail Look, the only way to spin bullshit is misuse the English language and twist meanings, [image]http://agfbrakpan.co.za/ClientFiles/Events/Matthew7-Do-not-judge/Pot-calling-kettle-black.png[/image]

mnottertail -> RE: Congressional Vote on Syria - Use of Chemical Weapons (9/9/2013 1:27:08 PM)
That is called a non-sequitur. It doesn't have anything to do with your misuse of simple English to promulgate imbecilities.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

5.859375E-02