Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
[Poll]

Should we be able to call a rose, a rose?


Yes... twatwaffles need to know they are twatwaffles
  58% (23)
No... telling someone they are a twatwaffles is a personal attack
  33% (13)
Freedom of speech... whats that?
  7% (3)


Total Votes : 39


(last vote on : 1/30/2014 7:17:06 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 4:38:24 PM   
VideoAdminGamma


Posts: 2233
Status: offline
Yes it has disappeared. Remove their stage, remove acknowledgement and they eventually go away. Especially when you ban the nics faster than they can create them.

The hide feature and not replying is the best way to help the staff and this site. The more people disagree and do not do it, the more work it is for staff.

Thanks for being a part of CollarMe,
Gamma

quote:

ORIGINAL: Apocalypso

The thread in question has disappeared. The mods are prejudiced against dragons. :(



< Message edited by VideoAdminGamma -- 1/4/2014 4:43:51 PM >


_____________________________

"The administration has the authority to handle situations in whatever manner they feel to be in the best interests of the forum, at that moment, in response to that event. "

http://www.collarchat.com/m_72/tm.htm

(in reply to Apocalypso)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 4:52:23 PM   
MercTech


Posts: 3706
Joined: 7/4/2006
Status: offline
But, isn't it tempting to call 'em an idiot when they blither.

(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 5:29:00 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
I foresee a poster new to collarme spouting such ignorant nonsense that the mods forget the TOS and proceed to shellack the fool in such ways that are beyond our humble abilities.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to MercTech)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 6:23:37 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
But I liked the dragon picture :-(

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 8:15:36 PM   
VideoAdminGamma


Posts: 2233
Status: offline
This one?



Image originally provided by Apocalypso

_____________________________

"The administration has the authority to handle situations in whatever manner they feel to be in the best interests of the forum, at that moment, in response to that event. "

http://www.collarchat.com/m_72/tm.htm

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 9:03:01 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
But what does it accomplish? That's the bottom line. If it just makes you feel better while the idiot gets even more nasty, then you're cutting off your own nose to spite your face.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 9:07:44 PM   
anniezz338


Posts: 1183
Joined: 8/17/2010
Status: offline
I would say no. The only thing it seems to accomplish is more work for the mods. Now I have to admit it's fun to fuck with them to a certain degree because they are begging for it. Overall, not worth the effort though.

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/4/2014 9:27:39 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
Thanks Chi!

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to anniezz338)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/5/2014 6:10:06 PM   
VideoAdminGamma


Posts: 2233
Status: offline
This topic had a break for a short while because we missed the use of the word "fucktard". It has been a guideline here for some time that any variation that uses "tard" in it is not allowed.

Since I felt partially to blame that the topic had gone on for a while, I contacted the OP and they agreed to allow a substitution to the word twatwaffle.

Please carry on and I apologize for my part in this inconvenience.

Gamma

_____________________________

"The administration has the authority to handle situations in whatever manner they feel to be in the best interests of the forum, at that moment, in response to that event. "

http://www.collarchat.com/m_72/tm.htm

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/5/2014 6:47:37 PM   
RemoteUser


Posts: 2854
Joined: 5/10/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminGamma

This topic had a break for a short while because we missed the use of the word "fucktard". It has been a guideline here for some time that any variation that uses "tard" in it is not allowed.


Oh yeah? You're one of these.







Attachment (1)

_____________________________

There is nothing worse than being right. Instead of being right, then, try to be open. It is more difficult, and more rewarding.


(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/5/2014 7:10:31 PM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline
I just have one question... What in the Holy Nine Hecks is a twatwaffles ?

(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/5/2014 8:21:02 PM   
MisterP61


Posts: 1345
Joined: 10/9/2007
Status: offline
Thank you Gamma. I know you are all super busy and stuffs, but I was going crazy trying to find this in polls and random snippets. Just sayin.

_____________________________

Proudly married to the "Diva of Destruction" LadyPact
Though the truth may vary, this ship will carry our bodies safe to shore - Of Monsters and Men
What is the maximum effective range of an excuse? Zero meters!

(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/5/2014 8:33:54 PM   
FelineRanger


Posts: 658
Joined: 9/4/2012
Status: offline
I keep trying to say "twatwaffle" and I can't do it without laughing. Hell, I can't even type it now because I'm laughing too hard.

BTW what does a twatwaffle look like? (Thank Microsoft for cut and paste!)


_____________________________

Bill

(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/5/2014 11:58:51 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
That's kind of why I like twatwaffle, FelineRanger. It's almost like a bit of comedy relief.

The other that I like is douchecanoe. That one, I can tell you what it looks like. Ever run across a royal twit when driving down the road? Well, in Alaska, lot of folks are big on outdoor activities and often, we'll see somebody with a canoe on top of the car. Combine the two and you have a real definition of a douchecanoe.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to FelineRanger)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/6/2014 5:25:50 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisterP61

I think about this one often. I am not talking about simple disagreements with friends and foes. I am talking about the legitimate twatwaffles out there. Of course My vote is for the letting them know they are twatwaffles and freedom of speech, but that is just My opinion.

ETA punctuation... yet again >.<



The problem that I would see with this is that there's no universally-accepted standard as to what constitutes a "twatwaffle," legitimate or otherwise. One person's "twatwaffle" might be another's "greatest human who ever lived."

If it's a matter of educating another poster (i.e. "letting them know they are [fill in the blank]"), then it's really only a matter of explaining one's position and the basis of one's opposition/disagreement with another poster's view. By calling someone a "twatwaffle" or some other name, the other person would only take that as meaning that you don't like them or what they wrote, but it doesn't explain why or what the basis of your disagreement is.

Personally, insults or harsh talk never really bothered me that much, but throwaway one-liners without any specifics or clarity can be rather pointless and offer nothing to a discussion. Jargon terms and slang might also cloud and confuse the discussion, like if someone doesn't know what a "twatwaffle" is. (Can one obtain a waffle iron which would make waffles in that particular shape?) If someone called someone else by that name, it would still be difficult to ascertain exactly what complaint is being made and what the basis of one's negative opinion might be.

Come to think of it, it is rather strange that we commonly use slang terms for genitalia as insults. It's the kind of crude stuff we would giggle at in sixth grade, but the better insults might tend to use a higher-level vocabulary and even scientific terms when appropriate. The best kind of insult is when they don't even know they're being insulted.

(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/6/2014 5:46:23 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
FR

I'm on the 'no' side here, too. I was a member of an unmoderated forum for a long while: it eventually degenerated into manure pit partly because *all* that happened on it, in the end, was offensiveness. The forum looked plain ugly; regulars started to leave and no-one replaced them except the sorts of cretins who could be offensive but nothing else. The Internet is a repository for some brilliant stuff (and we frequently see it here) but it's also a repository for the dung that people had kept a lid on in the pre-Net days.

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/6/2014 5:52:52 AM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I just have one question... What in the Holy Nine Hecks is a twatwaffles ?

One of my favorite insults.I use it all the time.

I can't speak for anyone else,but as for me, it's kinda derived from Stifler speak

_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to Darkfeather)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/6/2014 5:59:11 AM   
ChatteParfaitt


Posts: 6562
Joined: 3/22/2011
From: The t'aint of the Midwest -- Indiana
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63




The problem that I would see with this is that there's no universally-accepted standard as to what constitutes a "twatwaffle," legitimate or otherwise. One person's "twatwaffle" might be another's "greatest human who ever lived."






I agree, there is no accepted standard of what constitutes a twatwaffle or a douchcanoe, but we all know one when we see one.

I voted yes, since I've been calling people on their shit since I was two. Fortunately for the mods I have enough command of the English language I don't provide them with extra work.

Like Kana, I believe strongly that you have to call people on their shit. All it takes for evil to succeed is for a few good men to do nothing.

I *have* mellowed in my old age, I no longer follow drivers who fail to use their turn signal and accost them where they parked. Himself is grateful.





_____________________________



(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/6/2014 5:59:39 AM   
Darkfeather


Posts: 1142
Joined: 3/13/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana


quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkfeather

I just have one question... What in the Holy Nine Hecks is a twatwaffles ?

One of my favorite insults.I use it all the time.

I can't speak for anyone else,but as for me, it's kinda derived from Stifler speak


Not Stifler of the famed taking a dump in the beer cooler?

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/6/2014 6:05:01 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.148