Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
[Poll]

Should we be able to call a rose, a rose?


Yes... twatwaffles need to know they are twatwaffles
  58% (23)
No... telling someone they are a twatwaffles is a personal attack
  33% (13)
Freedom of speech... whats that?
  7% (3)


Total Votes : 39


(last vote on : 1/30/2014 7:17:06 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/7/2014 2:06:21 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Release the kraken!!!!



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FelineRanger)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/7/2014 2:07:20 PM   
VideoAdminChi


Posts: 3086
Joined: 8/6/2012
Status: offline
quote:

So i guess if i called someone a twatwaffle or a vagina pastry i would get a gold letter.


Yes, but feel free to use "wankrabbit."

(in reply to anniezz338)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/7/2014 2:18:17 PM   
mummyman321


Posts: 2102
Joined: 10/31/2005
From: Dusseldorf
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi

quote:

So i guess if i called someone a twatwaffle or a vagina pastry i would get a gold letter.


Yes, but feel free to use "wankrabbit."


Little wascalley wank rabbit! (in the voice of Elmer Fudd).

_____________________________

Life - Its not about where you are but about the journey to get there - I prefer to choose the road less traveled

(in reply to VideoAdminChi)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/7/2014 2:24:36 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VideoAdminChi
Yes, but feel free to use "wankrabbit."

I'll probably take you up on that.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to VideoAdminChi)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/7/2014 2:42:19 PM   
Kana


Posts: 6676
Joined: 10/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: MercTech
Curious.... before this thread, I'd never seen the term "twatwaffle" before.
Anyone have a clue where it comes from?

I can't tell you where it comes from. The first time I ever saw it was here.



Unless someone spontaneously invented it or I pulled it from some long forgotten memory, I think it's a Kana original.

I went through a spell a few years back where everything was "Twat"or "Wad." (I really like Fuckwad.It rolls so well, you fuckwad bastard you)
Twatwaffle came out of that period :-)


(See notes above re Stifler speak for origin details)

< Message edited by Kana -- 1/7/2014 2:48:04 PM >


_____________________________

"One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die. "
HST

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 10:15:34 AM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
I understand your desire to exercise freedom of speech while engaging in twatwafflery. Moving those posts to a segregated area would satisfy both our perspectives and would keep richer content in the mainstream of the CollarChat forums. Maybe they could rename the Politics and Religion forum to Politics, Religion & Twatwafflery using it as the destination for those twatastically twatish troll threads?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisterP61
quote:

ORIGINAL: ResidentSadist
Well, I vote no but for a different reason. The particular twat you are referring to is seeking negative attention. The more you give, the more they are inspied to stay and post. If you completely ignore them, they will go away and seek attention elsewhere.

I was mod at a smaller board, 80k members. It was techy gamers board so IP ban was hard, everyone knew about proxy servers. When we had a twatwaffle post troll bait, all the regulars knew not to respond. The few noobs that did respond got a personal form letter from me telling them if they did respond, I would ban them. They were not allowed to respond to the twatwaffle at all, anywhere, forever, for any reason, even if they said something that wasn;t troll bait. I sent the form letter warnings privately so there was no public attention in the thread.

I did not lock the threads. I wanted the poster to get no attention, not from mods, not from members. After a few posts, the OPs got no replies and sank out of sight quickly. The twats went away.

My personal warnings about banning for feeding on troll bait were serious. I swung the "ban stick" on trolls with no mercy and virtually hung their heads out on poles at the front gate . . . i.e., I had a sticky with names of the people that were banned and why they got banned so that everyone could see we were serious about the TOS.

It was good forum with good community spirit. And like CollarMe, the noobs were always recycling common questions over and over. But we had assistant mods. Everybody likes rank, so we issued an assistant mod rank. They could move threads and view or post on the mods only forums but they didn't have mod ban powers. We had a Ban Request forum in mods forum and they would post the name and reason with link to the post.

The assistant mods were allowed to answer question and they patrolled the forums keeping everyone in check. We (mods) developed a nice set of form replies (in the mod forums) and that was the assistant mods handled a lot of recycled noob questions. The basic info was in the mod reply and then other forum regulars could fill in any variants on the theme with short and simple replies.

Anyway, I feel sorry for the mods here because feeding on troll bait doesn't get you banned. With a membership full of sadists, chest thumping Dom/mes and victim submissives when troll bait hits the water or someone is really begging to be humiliated, it's like a shark feeding frenzy.

RS, I can definitely see Your side of this. I could only imagine what Moderating anything where there is the potential of numerous vagina pastries, would be like. I will agree to disagree, however, My way of seeing it is that if you are going to twatwaffle publicly on the internet, then I should be able to publicly let them know exactly what I think of their twatwafflery. Not to mention I like to have fun with trolls, especially the ones who think they are witty, but couldn't win a battle of said wits, much less the war. Does it egg them on? Yes. But I believe in their free speech, in showing their twue twatwaffleness, and I am an asshole too. May not be a great combination, but it is who I am and I make no qualms about it.

Thanks everyone for your replies. It is pretty much split down the middle on whether or not to allow.




_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 10:41:03 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
I prefer asshat. It's gender neutral. I strongly dislike people using female anatomy as the worst insult imaginable. It says to me that they view women as less. And I don't like bigots. If you wouldn't use a term referring to someone of a different race, then why feel it's okay to use such terms about women?

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 5:05:24 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MisterP61

I think about this one often. I am not talking about simple disagreements with friends and foes. I am talking about the legitimate twatwaffles out there. Of course My vote is for the letting them know they are twatwaffles and freedom of speech, but that is just My opinion.

ETA punctuation... yet again >.<



(I don't know what a twatwaffle is).

(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 5:06:01 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
a waffling twat

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 6:34:06 PM   
ExiledTyrant


Posts: 4547
Joined: 12/9/2013
From: Exiled
Status: offline
Okay MP, now you've opened a can of worms.

First, never having tasted a twatwaffle, I cannot give fair biased/unbiased, input... so let's just transpose twatwaffle for cocksucker.

Now, I've heard cocksucker used in derogatory context. However, having many cocksuckers kneeling before me, leaning over the gear shift, sprawled out on the sofa... well, you get it... I have yet to find the act derogatory, in fact i find it wonderful. To the point, when a politician does something absolutely awesome, we should shout "Hail the Cocksucker!"

I suppose some people may have had a negative or even a bad experience with a cocksucker, but I have a hard time imagining that enough people have had such an experience as to transform "cocksucker" in all its beauty, into something bad. Even considering the law of averages, I've had more cocksuckers in my life than most gynecologists will see in a career, and have yet to have one so bad, I'd consider "cocksucker" to be a bad thing.

YMMV
Exiled

_____________________________

Gnothi Seauton
To lead, first follow: Aurelius, Epictetus, Descartes, Sun Tzu, to name a few.

Semper fidelis (which sometimes feels like a burden)

(in reply to MisterP61)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 6:38:40 PM   
MisterP61


Posts: 1345
Joined: 10/9/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana
Twatwaffle came out of that period :-)

Uhmmmm funny as fuck here.

_____________________________

Proudly married to the "Diva of Destruction" LadyPact
Though the truth may vary, this ship will carry our bodies safe to shore - Of Monsters and Men
What is the maximum effective range of an excuse? Zero meters!

(in reply to Kana)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 7:07:04 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

a waffling twat


Is that like a warbling twat?

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 7:09:50 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
a dumb warbling twat

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/24/2014 7:16:25 PM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

a dumb warbling twat


Hmmmm.....

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/25/2014 9:42:05 AM   
windchymes


Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline
LOL....I literally got permabanned from eNotAlone for using the word twatwaffle. I had over 500 good posts going, which is a lot for in there because they're not chatty like in here, just question and offer lame advice. Use the word once, not even directed at someone, and I got banned for "trolling", lol.

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/25/2014 10:46:46 AM   
LookieNoNookie


Posts: 12216
Joined: 8/9/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

LOL....I literally got permabanned from eNotAlone for using the word twatwaffle. I had over 500 good posts going, which is a lot for in there because they're not chatty like in here, just question and offer lame advice. Use the word once, not even directed at someone, and I got banned for "trolling", lol.


WTF is enaotalone?

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/25/2014 10:50:01 AM   
VideoAdminGamma


Posts: 2233
Status: offline
Using "cocksucker" in a derogatory fashion is against TOS. This is because of the association of aligning that word in a derogatory fashion and homosexuals.

http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4579513


Regards,
Gamma

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant

Okay MP, now you've opened a can of worms.

First, never having tasted a twatwaffle, I cannot give fair biased/unbiased, input... so let's just transpose twatwaffle for cocksucker.

Now, I've heard cocksucker used in derogatory context. However, having many cocksuckers kneeling before me, leaning over the gear shift, sprawled out on the sofa... well, you get it... I have yet to find the act derogatory, in fact i find it wonderful. To the point, when a politician does something absolutely awesome, we should shout "Hail the Cocksucker!"

I suppose some people may have had a negative or even a bad experience with a cocksucker, but I have a hard time imagining that enough people have had such an experience as to transform "cocksucker" in all its beauty, into something bad. Even considering the law of averages, I've had more cocksuckers in my life than most gynecologists will see in a career, and have yet to have one so bad, I'd consider "cocksucker" to be a bad thing.

YMMV
Exiled



_____________________________

"The administration has the authority to handle situations in whatever manner they feel to be in the best interests of the forum, at that moment, in response to that event. "

http://www.collarchat.com/m_72/tm.htm

(in reply to ExiledTyrant)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/25/2014 10:56:57 AM   
myotherself


Posts: 7157
Joined: 3/9/2006
From: The cold bit of the UK
Status: offline
But we'd be ok with fartgoblin?

Gender neutral and everyone does it!

I for one will not be using 'wankrabbit', for obvious reasons...

_____________________________

There's nowt so queer as folk


(in reply to VideoAdminGamma)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/25/2014 11:45:30 AM   
windchymes


Posts: 9410
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LookieNoNookie


quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

LOL....I literally got permabanned from eNotAlone for using the word twatwaffle. I had over 500 good posts going, which is a lot for in there because they're not chatty like in here, just question and offer lame advice. Use the word once, not even directed at someone, and I got banned for "trolling", lol.


WTF is enaotalone?


It's a "relationship advice" forum I stumbled on about a year ago. enotalone.com I'd like to see a bunch of you join up and then bombard the place with twatwaffles, lol. Their mods would just combust.

_____________________________

You know it's going to be a GOOD blow job when she puts a Breathe Right strip on first.

Pick-up artists and garbage men should trade names.

(in reply to LookieNoNookie)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? - 1/30/2014 11:19:08 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
Personally, I think we should be able to refer to someone with the terms Ass, idiot, among other things, especially when they hijack a thread just to feed their warped sense of political correctness.

Sometimes, the term ass would be a compliment, since the proper term is so socially unacceptable as to make Don Rickles blush with shame.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Should we be able to call a rose, a rose? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125