Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=-


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=- Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 6:37:16 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Maybe consider some more recent numbers. Things are changing.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

Yeah. We're up to a whole 26% of Republicans supporting marriage equality. At that rate in a couple of centuries...

Only 22% of Americans still identify as Republican. I wouldn't worry too much about it.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx



That's a good point. So I have a plan. We pick a state that has a shit load of democrats, like say california. Then we wait for an election that we know will draw the most liberals out to vote. Obama's election would have been a good example, then we ask the people to vote on gay marriage. If the only ones against it are those 22 % there should be no problems getting it passed. Right? I mean with all those lefties out there backing up us gays, how could it possibly lose.


Oh wait...they tried that one already and it failed miserably.

Dumbass liar
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/06/news/la-pn-gay-marriage-measures-maryland-maine-20121106



Maybe you could be a bit clearer. What exactly did I lie about? As far as I know prop 8 didn't have a problem getting passed in CA in 2008 and there were record numbers of democrats voting in that one. If the left is so accepting of gays, why did they shoot down gay marriage there?

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 6:39:10 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Maybe consider some more recent numbers. Things are changing.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/162398/sex-marriage-support-solidifies-above.aspx

Yeah. We're up to a whole 26% of Republicans supporting marriage equality. At that rate in a couple of centuries...

Only 22% of Americans still identify as Republican. I wouldn't worry too much about it.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-high-americans-identify-independents.aspx



That's a good point. So I have a plan. We pick a state that has a shit load of democrats, like say california. Then we wait for an election that we know will draw the most liberals out to vote. Obama's election would have been a good example, then we ask the people to vote on gay marriage. If the only ones against it are those 22 % there should be no problems getting it passed. Right? I mean with all those lefties out there backing up us gays, how could it possibly lose.


Oh wait...they tried that one already and it failed miserably.

Dumbass liar
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/06/news/la-pn-gay-marriage-measures-maryland-maine-20121106



Maybe you could be a bit clearer. What exactly did I lie about? As far as I know prop 8 didn't have a problem getting passed in CA in 2008 and there were record numbers of democrats voting in that one. If the left is so accepting of gays, why did they shoot down gay marriage there?

Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 6:41:16 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: chatterbox24


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
And for the record just because someone doesn't condone gay marriages doesn't mean they hate gays.

Ahhh...yes it does.
It means that you feel that they are not good enough to enjoy the same goodies you do. I am sure that all your gay friends appreciate your tolerance of their "deviance"





Dont tell me how I feel or think about people. Your wrong.

I did not tell you how you feel I pointed out what you said about how you feel. You said you are a bogot.


do yourself a favor and give your boil of rants some relief and squeeze the festering pus out of them.

When their are "boil suckers" like yourself there is no need for me to trouble myself with "squeezing".


I think they have came to head because the same junk keeps ozzing out.
here is a needle, pop that ignorant unsubstantiated opinion, pete and repeat.

When you start validating your opinions I will stop pointing out their ignorance.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 6:45:53 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

< Message edited by thishereboi -- 6/10/2014 6:46:16 AM >


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 7:29:35 AM   
slaveoubliette


Posts: 74
Joined: 5/22/2014
Status: offline
OHHHHH like Mmmmmyyyyyyy God!

rainbows are breaking out all over the world.... it is about time!

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 7:31:32 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

Perhaps it was a close thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_8
600k votes out of 13 million cast. And now 6 years later things outside of your party things have changed for the better. Now if only you would get with that change.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/10/2014 12:21:55 PM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline
Here is the validation you need sweet cheeks
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: chatterbox24


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: chatterbox24
And for the record just because someone doesn't condone gay marriages doesn't mean they hate gays.

Ahhh...yes it does.
It means that you feel that they are not good enough to enjoy the same goodies you do. I am sure that all your gay friends appreciate your tolerance of their "deviance"





Dont tell me how I feel or think about people. Your wrong.

I did not tell you how you feel I pointed out what you said about how you feel. You said you are a bogot.


do yourself a favor and give your boil of rants some relief and squeeze the festering pus out of them.

When their are "boil suckers" like yourself there is no need for me to trouble myself with "squeezing".


I think they have came to head because the same junk keeps ozzing out.
here is a needle, pop that ignorant unsubstantiated opinion, pete and repeat.

When you start validating your opinions I will stop pointing out their ignorance.




[Offensive picture removed.]

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Moderator3 -- 6/12/2014 12:42:08 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 4:59:39 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

Perhaps it was a close thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_8
600k votes out of 13 million cast. And now 6 years later things outside of your party things have changed for the better. Now if only you would get with that change.


perhaps it was, perhaps because it isn't a partisan issue like I said before.

And you still haven't told me what I lied about. You called me a dumbass liar, were you going to explain it or is your tourettes acting up again.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 5:20:03 AM   
chatterbox24


Posts: 2182
Joined: 1/22/2012
Status: offline
Sister, I think it's possibly Tourette's.
Btw your gay, correct? Notice I called you sister? That's how much I am bigoted against you. I sense your heart and I like you. Contrary to the belief I'm a unfair violent bigot I am not.
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

Perhaps it was a close thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_8
600k votes out of 13 million cast. And now 6 years later things outside of your party things have changed for the better. Now if only you would get with that change.


perhaps it was, perhaps because it isn't a partisan issue like I said before.

And you still haven't told me what I lied about. You called me a dumbass liar, were you going to explain it or is your tourettes acting up again.


(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 7:36:53 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Contrary to the belief I'm a unfair violent bigot I am not.

That would be your ignorant unsubstantiated childish opinion.

(in reply to chatterbox24)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 1:51:45 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

Perhaps it was a close thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_8
600k votes out of 13 million cast. And now 6 years later things outside of your party things have changed for the better. Now if only you would get with that change.


perhaps it was, perhaps because it isn't a partisan issue like I said before.

And you still haven't told me what I lied about. You called me a dumbass liar, were you going to explain it or is your tourettes acting up again.

You claimed that Democrats tried putting marriage equality to a vote in a blue state and "it failed miserably" That of course was a lie as I established.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 4:47:31 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

Perhaps it was a close thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_8
600k votes out of 13 million cast. And now 6 years later things outside of your party things have changed for the better. Now if only you would get with that change.


perhaps it was, perhaps because it isn't a partisan issue like I said before.

And you still haven't told me what I lied about. You called me a dumbass liar, were you going to explain it or is your tourettes acting up again.

You claimed that Democrats tried putting marriage equality to a vote in a blue state and "it failed miserably" That of course was a lie as I established.



It was a mistake, but I don't expect you to understand the difference. Baby steps and all. And you were right, my bad. It was the republicans who pushed to get it on the ballot. It was the democrats who voted it in.



< Message edited by thishereboi -- 6/11/2014 4:48:50 PM >


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 5:17:46 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

It was the democrats who voted it in.

The story appears to be a bit more complex than that.

The vote on Proposition 8 was polarized to a remarkable degree along the lines of party 
identification, ideology, and religiosity.  The largest divide—fully 60 percentage 
points—was between conservatives and liberals (82‐22).  A similarly large gap (51 
points) existed between Republicans and Democrats. 


http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/issues/egan_sherrill_prop8_1_6_09.pdf | Quote from p. 4

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 5:31:49 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi


quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


Maybe you should realize that things change over time and  that 2008 was 6 years ago.


Yes they do change, which is why I get confused when atheists start talking about the crusades when ever the subject of religion comes up. But that's another topic isn't it.

2008 may have been 6 long years ago but the claim that the republicans are a bunch of homophobes and the democrats are open minded loving individuals goes back farther than that. So tell me, if that is really true, why did prop 8 pass when so many of those open minded living individuals came out to vote?

Perhaps the issue isn't so partisan after all.

Perhaps it was a close thing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition_8
600k votes out of 13 million cast. And now 6 years later things outside of your party things have changed for the better. Now if only you would get with that change.


perhaps it was, perhaps because it isn't a partisan issue like I said before.

And you still haven't told me what I lied about. You called me a dumbass liar, were you going to explain it or is your tourettes acting up again.

You claimed that Democrats tried putting marriage equality to a vote in a blue state and "it failed miserably" That of course was a lie as I established.



It was a mistake, but I don't expect you to understand the difference. Baby steps and all. And you were right, my bad. It was the republicans who pushed to get it on the ballot. It was the democrats who voted it in.

You made a factual claim you knew to be untrue. That is a lie.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 5:35:58 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveoubliette

OHHHHH like Mmmmmyyyyyyy God!

rainbows are breaking out all over the world.... it is about time!

Amen!

This is something I'd never expected to see in my lifetime.

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to slaveoubliette)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 5:42:39 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveoubliette

OHHHHH like Mmmmmyyyyyyy God!

rainbows are breaking out all over the world.... it is about time!

Amen!

This is something I'd never expected to see in my lifetime.

It seems inevitable that the Supreme Court will have to take one of these state court cases and simple over turn all the bans once and for all in the up coming term.

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 6:10:01 PM   
BecomingV


Posts: 916
Joined: 11/11/2013
Status: offline
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h47slByX7jI

Remember QAF (Queer As Folk on Showtime)?

Brian and Justin would be so proud!



< Message edited by BecomingV -- 6/11/2014 6:17:00 PM >

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 8:42:18 PM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


You made a factual claim you knew to be untrue. That is a lie.



No, I didn't, but don't let that stop you from claiming I did. It's what you do best.

_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/11/2014 10:10:11 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


You made a factual claim you knew to be untrue. That is a lie.



No, I didn't, but don't let that stop you from claiming I did. It's what you do best.

Then you are an uninformed idiot. Take your pick.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage ... - 6/12/2014 3:25:15 AM   
GotSteel


Posts: 5871
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
It was a mistake, but I don't expect you to understand the difference. Baby steps and all. And you were right, my bad. It was the republicans who pushed to get it on the ballot. It was the democrats who voted it in.


There is a lot to be said for checking your facts before opening your mouth. As I've pointed out to you before this is overwhelmingly a partisan issue where you're vote gets used to oppress gay people.

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: -=Federal Judge Strikes Down Virginia Gay Marriage Ban=- Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.047