SweetAnise
Posts: 480
Joined: 8/23/2013 Status: offline
|
Well FelineRanger, from what I read not only did they think it but they also conspired to kidnap the wife and another female (who was a FBI agent) and purchased products and items to do so. I believe that crosses the line of thought crime. quote:
ORIGINAL: FelineRanger So let me get this straight. They never actually put a hand on anyone, this is all chat, postings on a website, and phone calls between a fetishist and a narc. Yes, there are some specific details and suggestions, as typically happens when a thread detailing a fantasy goes on for a while. One of the defendant's wives knew about the online chatter and use of her pictures and allowed it to continue along with their own BDSM play. Effectively speaking, she was an active participant, not a mere witness. Two questions to start. If I take time, I'll come up with many more so I'll stop with these two. If the prosecutors "knew" the wife was lying, why didn't they charge her with perjury? How is this anything other than prosecution of thoughtcrime?
< Message edited by SweetAnise -- 3/16/2014 12:26:49 PM >
_____________________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us."-Marianne Williamson
|