Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: "Yes means yes" part 2


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 8:20:23 PM   
littleladybug


Posts: 1082
Joined: 5/30/2013
Status: offline
At the risk of getting this thread back to the Columbia story....

She *did* report it. Whatever system Columbia has, it played itself out, apparently. Now, rather than dealing with the legal system, she's decided to take on this VERY much more public mission.

I'd be very interested to hear Columbia's side of this-- which, apparently will come out with the Title IX lawsuit. But, regardless, I still do question the decision not to go to the NYPD rather than campus police (even if not initially, certainly not 2 years later).

(in reply to ExiledTyrant)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 8:21:27 PM   
shiftyw


Posts: 2837
Joined: 6/6/2013
From: The Shire
Status: offline
Whoa.

We actually agree on several points, and I think I've been pretty cordial to this point.

There is a time limit in most states, and I actually DO think it should be shorter- but I get that SOL are set up based on severity of the crime- but I agree it would make it better for BOTH parties.
I also am not denying false reports DO happen, but so does ACTUAL rape- and our definitions of that are a different (clearly).

It was clear as day in my case that I was NOT ready for sex. I made it crystal clear before I engaged in ANYTHING with him. I said it was fine to mess around in other ways. While messing around in other ways, dead sober, while I screamed NO Don't! over and over, he pinned me down and took my virginity. He covered my mouth and over powered me. Then later threatened me at knife point if I went to the cops.

Certainly I wasn't underage and it wasn't as horrible as what you've experienced. I'm glad that you've moved past it and consider yourself a survivor- but I'd actually like to know what your secret is? I've been in therapy for 5 years. I'm on klonopin to control my anixiety. I've sobbed in the arms of the guy I LOVE because he triggered me and I'd just LOVE to feel fucking normal again.

I know you're going to tell me "growing up" is the secret- but dang I'd like an instruction manual of how to better do that cause clearly I'm not doing it right if I'm still not over my rape?
I suppose we should tell all the soldiers to grow up too while were at it. I MEAN- they volunteered? They deserve that PTSD right?

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 8:26:23 PM   
ExiledTyrant


Posts: 4547
Joined: 12/9/2013
From: Exiled
Status: offline
You can perpetuate what ever delusion you need to to shelter yourself from the truth. It doesn't diminish the fact that the content of your posts reveal you to be a foul and bitter person, and your antagonistic nature over the topic will not retroactively negate the issues that brought you to that place in your life. You're the victim of your own choices and raising hell over your past mistakes because in your sociopathic delusion you perpetrated no wrong, will change nothing. Your perception is warped and is exactly that of a predator and perpetrator.

Jus sayin

_____________________________

Gnothi Seauton
To lead, first follow: Aurelius, Epictetus, Descartes, Sun Tzu, to name a few.

Semper fidelis (which sometimes feels like a burden)

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 8:27:58 PM   
quizzicalkitten


Posts: 312
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shiftyw

Whoa.

We actually agree on several points, and I think I've been pretty cordial to this point.

There is a time limit in most states, and I actually DO think it should be shorter- but I get that SOL are set up based on severity of the crime- but I agree it would make it better for BOTH parties.
I also am not denying false reports DO happen, but so does ACTUAL rape- and our definitions of that are a different (clearly).

It was clear as day in my case that I was NOT ready for sex. I made it crystal clear before I engaged in ANYTHING with him. I said it was fine to mess around in other ways. While messing around in other ways, dead sober, while I screamed NO Don't! over and over, he pinned me down and took my virginity. He covered my mouth and over powered me. Then later threatened me at knife point if I went to the cops.

Certainly I wasn't underage and it wasn't as horrible as what you've experienced. I'm glad that you've moved past it and consider yourself a survivor- but I'd actually like to know what your secret is? I've been in therapy for 5 years. I'm on klonopin to control my anixiety. I've sobbed in the arms of the guy I LOVE because he triggered me and I'd just LOVE to feel fucking normal again.

I know you're going to tell me "growing up" is the secret- but dang I'd like an instruction manual of how to better do that cause clearly I'm not doing it right if I'm still not over my rape?
I suppose we should tell all the soldiers to grow up too while were at it. I MEAN- they volunteered? They deserve that PTSD right?



I got over it by putting the bastard in jail then realizing talking it over and over with some bint who had no idea what I went through only kept it fresh and open and aggravating and bleeding, so I stopped. I went on with my life because It didnt end. I got a job sucked it up when I was triggered, sucked it up when I got dumped after revealing I was raped, sucked it up when people told me I shouldnt have seduced the man.

And realized what Other people say about me, means nothing. Its what I think of myself that matters. Not the guy in the checkout lane, or the asshole on the internet, but me.


(in reply to shiftyw)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 8:33:41 PM   
quizzicalkitten


Posts: 312
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant

You can perpetuate what ever delusion you need to to shelter yourself from the truth. It doesn't diminish the fact that the content of your posts reveal you to be a foul and bitter person, and your antagonistic nature over the topic will not retroactively negate the issues that brought you to that place in your life. You're the victim of your own choices and raising hell over your past mistakes because in your sociopathic delusion you perpetrated no wrong, will change nothing. Your perception is warped and is exactly that of a predator and perpetrator.

Jus sayin



So Im a predator for saying its not rape if you consented even if you didnt want to do it.

Got it, Cleared up so perfectly there. You are just a special little snowflake.. talking to you has changed my life so dramatically, I think every guy touching a girls ass in a crowded room now is rape like most would drive you to believe.

Im neither a sociopath nor deluded. Disagreeing with you or other people on what rape is or isnt doesnt make me so as much as you wish it were true... But please do continue to make an ass out of yourself, Its highly entertaining.

(in reply to ExiledTyrant)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 8:45:26 PM   
kkaliforniaa


Posts: 263
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
I'd like to address comments made, and then try to get the thread back on track..

I never said being drunk was an invitation to be raped, if you chose to read it that way, then that is on you. But no one forces [well not in most cases] you to drink so much that you can't remember where you parked your car, etc. It is your responsibility, not the bartenders, not the store clerks, etc, to make sure that you are capable of taking care of yourself. Also, why is a girl, or any person for that matter, getting so drunk that they can't remember that they have a test in two days? That is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY, NOT victim blaming.. I guess college professors will now have to watch how they treat students, because if a student doesn't take a test because they missed class [because they were hung over], in the old days, that would have resulted in an F for the test. Now students will have to be given an opportunity to retake the test *shaking head*. What a shame.

I'm fairly certain the other thread was pulled because a warning was made not to discuss anything that violates the terms of service, but someone probably chose to push the boundaries, thus the thread was pulled. Normally, threads aren't pulled just because people are voicing their opinions, as you should be aware of. If you choose to take offense to any of the opinions voiced by people, then that is your right.. The forums are open to the public, and if people want to say something, so long as it doesn't violate the terms of service, then they should be allowed to. People also aren't forced in to visiting every thread, responding to every post either. You chose to view these threads, please remember that

If anyone feels that I have been trying to guilt people, that was not my intention, especially since I SPECIFICALLY stated that "YOU" was a GENERAL TERM, not targeted at anyone specific. If you chose to read it like I was blaming you specifically, once again, how people chose to interpret things is on them.. I did also say, "At that time, I had to do what was best for me and that was not to report it but get the psychological help I needed and the emotional support I needed", and that is always important too! so it seems like I'm being targeted because people chose to pick and choose pieces of an entire post! You can't do that. You have to take the whole thing, or nothing at all! You can't save the whole cake, AND eat it too, it's one or the other!

THANK YOU KITTEN!! A SURVIVOR!! That is how people should look at this! Why can't it be rapist versus SURVIVOR, rather than rapist versus victim!!

And the thing with police, shifty, do you really think they want criminals roaming free? Why did they become police officers if they were okay with letting criminals go free? Also, if you have a problem with the prison system, and the rehabilitation of convicts, then maybe you should try helping to fix the system, rather than complaining about how it doesn't work. Just saying
quote:

The police interview may take as long as several hours, depending on the circumstances of your case. Some questions will probably feel intrusive, and the officer will probably go over the details of your attack several times. The extensive questioning isn't because the police don't believe you; it is the officer's job to get every detail down precisely, to make the strongest possible case against your rapist.
https://www.rainn.org/get-information/legal-information/reporting-rape

But if you think RAINN, and other crisis centers are full of *bleep*, then I don't know what else to say. I don't think they would be as successful in helping people as they have been [RAINN has been around for 20 years now!!]

--

Umm, I don't think 1. people were tweeting or posting on Facebook WHILE they were having sex [since I don't know what actually happened, I remain impartial, and anything will be considered "sex", as rape is still sex] 2. if you're talking about the Steubenville case, those were teenagers who most probably didn't even realise that what they were doing was wrong, because they are so popular that people will lick their feet if told to! This goes back to [I think] my last post on the old thread, about how programs like D.A.R.E need to discuss what is consensual, what isn't, what it looks like when people are drunk, etc. It's all about education, because surprisingly, people still may not know that sex with a drunk person is a criminal offense!, even if both people say "yes" at the time

quote:

The yes means yes law also applies in reverse, so if you're both too drunk to consent- you're both breaking it. 'Affirmative consent' means affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity. ... Lack of protest or resistance does not mean consent, nor does silence mean consent. (It) ... can be revoked at any time."

Let's see.. A person can be 1. affirmative 2. conscious 3. voluntarily agreeing to engage in sexual activity, all while being piss ass drunk. So "yes means yes" doesn't really fit. The only situation it works with is when people are actually PASSED out! And that goes back to educating people!.. I'd also like to go back to why "no means no". If someone doesn't want to have sex, "no" should be enough. If someone decides they don't like that response, and continues, that is force, thus, rape!

shifty, you actually make it seem like false accusations happen with less frequency than you think.. From what I posted on the old thread, it comes to about ONE false claim every hour, every year! I'd say that is a lot!.. Also, what is a reason people don't go to the police? If you were raped, go to the police. They don't have to believe you, but it is their job to get evidence, as difficult as it may be. And while you may not think there is evidence, unless you are an impartial police officer, equipped with all the gidgets and gadgets that they have, if there is evidence, they should be able to find it! Factor in, as Kitten mentioned, if the person has done this once, they may have done it other times. Last time I checked, a person's history is still considered to be evidence. Do you really think that people would have reported similar situations, with little to no evidence, if a crime hadn't been committed. While people may be petty, I don't think they are that petty

--

shifty, my advice on getting over something, do just that. Don't keep living in the past. What does that accomplish? We all make mistakes, go through horrible things. Yes, talking about the experiences will help, but 5, 10, 20 years later, if you keep seeing yourself as a victim, that is what you will be. Essentially you are giving your rapist all the power.. .. Wow! That is insulting,

quote:

I suppose we should tell all the soldiers to grow up too while were at it. I MEAN- they volunteered? They deserve that PTSD right?

First, not every soldier gets PTSD. The support they have from friends and family, etc, play a part in whether they develop it. Second, you are suggesting that these men and women are not grown up and need to!! I'm sorry, but seeing people you have been serving with, having their leg blown off, or having to shoot a kid because they are the enemy!! That is *BLEEP* up!! That is NOT easy to just get over, and "growing up" is.. WOW!! Soldiers lives days, weeks, MONTHS in the battlefield, a rape victim, a few hours, maybe a few days, for most victims. *shaking head*.. I'd also like to point out, two SURVIVORS, maybe you should read books about them and see how they managed.. Jaycee Lee Dugard [who was kidnapped for 13 YEARS, and had TWO children by her kidnapper!!], and Elizabeth Smart ["Smart testified to being raped three to four times daily, tied up and threatened with death if she attempted escape." Wikipedia].. .. I'll also agree with Kitten, that putting your rapist in jail would help!

--

Now, can we try figuring out ways to make reporting rapes less traumatizing to the victims/survivors.

< Message edited by kkaliforniaa -- 9/3/2014 8:47:30 PM >

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 9:10:29 PM   
shiftyw


Posts: 2837
Joined: 6/6/2013
From: The Shire
Status: offline
Kkalifornia- In many of those responses I was responding to quizzical kitten, not you. Specifically the soldiers one- I was being sarcastic.

InHisHeart, and I have explained why we didn't report, and don't feel others do.
That was your question no?
Has it not been answered? You can keep asking "How does that make sense" if you want- but I think we both made it clear?

I didn't mean to imply this thread should get pulled...and I'm certain that I didn't? Perhaps you're misinterpreting what I wrote.

RE: Cops- I know THREE people in my life who have said "I want to become a cop so I can beat up/kill *insert racial slur here*" There's a lot of reasons people become cops. Some are great, others aren't. Its also a "lack of evidence" that frightened me. I mean- lets say the cops did get involved, but nothing came of it, then I have to live with my attacker who, threatened my life...or drop out of school. Trauma is hard to explain, and as I already said, I can't believe the courage it takes to go to the cops.

I do think false accusations happen less than you think they do. 2-8% of a grossly under reported crime.

I don't know what you're talking about with the tests- but I think that comment was also directed at Quizzical.

The facebook thing I was talking about involved minors and I don't want to link to anything...but look up Stuebenville Rape Case...


___________________________________________

Quizzical:

For me calling myself a "survivor" over a "victim" simply just doesn't have the same power for me as it has for you. Its not how anyone "should" look at anything. No one "should" do anything they don't think works for them.
Therapy has been a god send- now that I've found good therapists.

I waited 4 years to even tell anyone it happened. I thought I could suck it up, but I was spending whole nights awake checking locks and behind doors. I was also struggling with suicidal thoughts. I had obsessive thoughts about what I would do if it happened again- to the point that it was interfering with everything. I was hyperalert all the time. I avoided the subway because the smell triggered me so badly (cement- like our dorm rooms). I still got A's. I still graduated in 4 years. I've held MOST of my jobs- only two that I couldn't take anymore. I'm currently a manager of a restaurant and incredibly successful. I've of course been hurt as a result of telling someone I'm interested in about it- but I've moved on and have been dating my guy for 5 years. I just still struggle with depression and anxiety, and occasionally hyper vigilance- for which I have and continue to seek help with, as you've suggested doing if you're depressed.

(in reply to kkaliforniaa)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 9:32:44 PM   
kkaliforniaa


Posts: 263
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
shifty, there is no way to know if someone is being sarcastic or not. Clearly, I did not view it as sarcasm, rather an insult, which I'm sure many other people, especially people who have experienced battle!

No, the tests was in response to the comment you made, "So if a girl gets so drunk she can't remember what day of the week it is, its an invitation to be RAPED? How does the rapist get out of that so easily? < That is victim blaming. Not personal responsibility.". As I said, no, it is not an invitation to rape, but people need to be responsible enough not to get to the point where they don't know where they are, etc. By allowing people to use the "I was drunk" defense, people will try getting away with EVERYTHING, from missing work [people can keep their jobs, so long as they get treatment for alcoholism], for missing tests in college [it hasn't reached that point, but I'm sure it will], etc. Yes, if you are actually addicted to alcohol, then yes, seeking treatment should be allowed, but it seems like everyone is being treated with kid gloves

That's another problem with not getting cops involved. People think the worst. What if they don't find evidence.. What if they do. That is how it should be viewed. But since, with you, this happened a while ago, there is no sense thinking about what could have been, since it won't change anything

I'm slightly familiar with the Stuebenville rape case, that is why I mentioned it, but like I said, I doubt they were actually posting WHILE they were engaged in the activities they participated in. And as I said, the people involved were immature [on BOTH sides] and thought that what they were doing was okay.

As for checking locks, etc, there is nothing wrong with that.. Would you rather KNOW that the door is locked, or think about it all night while you're trying to go to sleep. Measure twice, cut once and all that. There is also nothing wrong with avoiding the subway, or other triggers, so long as it doesn't interfere with your daily life. I'm sure depression and anxiety are common among any victims, in time those should subside and you won't dwell on the past as much. Like I said, by allowing the past to control your future, the criminal still holds the power!

(in reply to shiftyw)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 9:45:20 PM   
kkaliforniaa


Posts: 263
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
oOo Here's one to try getting the thread back on track

Should a person's criminal history [past or present] have an effect of their education? For example [and let's just keep it on rape, so as to not get even messier]:
1. if someone had been accused [but not convicted] of rape 5+- years prior to submitting an application to attend a place of higher education [could be Ivy league, could be some community college], but wasn't convicted, should the school be allowed to refuse admittance?
2. if someone had been convicted of rape, served time, has been released, should THIS have an effect on gaining admittance to a place of higher education [anywhere from Ivy league to a community college]?
3. if someone if CURRENTLY being accused of rape, should the college play a part in determining the person's innocence or guilt? Should the accused be expelled, even if they haven't been convicted?
4. if someone posts fliers around campus, including names of alleged rapists, should this person be punished by the school?

< Message edited by kkaliforniaa -- 9/3/2014 9:46:43 PM >

(in reply to kkaliforniaa)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/3/2014 9:55:06 PM   
shiftyw


Posts: 2837
Joined: 6/6/2013
From: The Shire
Status: offline
After the major trauma of rape one tends to assuming the worse unless they summon the courage to overcome that. Which I have talked about many, many times on this thread

(in reply to kkaliforniaa)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 3:49:33 AM   
LetstalkboutRAP3


Posts: 49
Joined: 9/30/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kkaliforniaa


I'm fairly certain the other thread was pulled because a warning was made not to discuss anything that violates the terms of service, but someone probably chose to push the boundaries, thus the thread was pulled.


If that's what happened, it wasn't me. I didn't make any posts after the warning.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kkaliforniaa

oOo Here's one to try getting the thread back on track

Should a person's criminal history [past or present] have an effect of their education? For example [and let's just keep it on rape, so as to not get even messier]:
1. if someone had been accused [but not convicted] of rape 5+- years prior to submitting an application to attend a place of higher education [could be Ivy league, could be some community college], but wasn't convicted, should the school be allowed to refuse admittance?
2. if someone had been convicted of rape, served time, has been released, should THIS have an effect on gaining admittance to a place of higher education [anywhere from Ivy league to a community college]?
3. if someone if CURRENTLY being accused of rape, should the college play a part in determining the person's innocence or guilt? Should the accused be expelled, even if they haven't been convicted?
4. if someone posts fliers around campus, including names of alleged rapists, should this person be punished by the school?


No, no, no, yes. The only thing that should determine admittance to college is scholastic potential and achievement. Colleges are in the business of educating students not criminal trials and investigations. If the school doesn't punish on campus vigilantism, they become liable for damages caused by said vigilantism.

What should be the role of polygraph and/or FMRI tests when investigating alleged rapes? Should all complainants and/or alleged assailants be offered lie detection testing as a means to corroborate their story?

(in reply to kkaliforniaa)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 5:42:52 AM   
FieryOpal


Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline
No, it wasn't you or any of us who caused the other rape thread to get locked once the Mod issued a warning. It was a well-meaning poster who (inadvertently) precipitated this action.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3
quote:

ORIGINAL: kkaliforniaa

Should a person's criminal history [past or present] have an effect of their education? For example [and let's just keep it on rape, so as to not get even messier]:
1. if someone had been accused [but not convicted] of rape 5+- years prior to submitting an application to attend a place of higher education [could be Ivy league, could be some community college], but wasn't convicted, should the school be allowed to refuse admittance?
2. if someone had been convicted of rape, served time, has been released, should THIS have an effect on gaining admittance to a place of higher education [anywhere from Ivy league to a community college]?
3. if someone if CURRENTLY being accused of rape, should the college play a part in determining the person's innocence or guilt? Should the accused be expelled, even if they haven't been convicted?
4. if someone posts fliers around campus, including names of alleged rapists, should this person be punished by the school?

No, no, no, yes. The only thing that should determine admittance to college is scholastic potential and achievement. Colleges are in the business of educating students not criminal trials and investigations. If the school doesn't punish on campus vigilantism, they become liable for damages caused by said vigilantism.

What should be the role of polygraph and/or FMRI tests when investigating alleged rapes? Should all complainants and/or alleged assailants be offered lie detection testing as a means to corroborate their story?

Speaking of good intentions, no polygraph results are admissible in court. Inconclusive results aren't helpful in the court of public opinion, and a lawyer would advise his client not to take one. In this country, we are deemed innocent until proven guilty. For this reason alone, I cannot support what this student is doing. She feels she has the right to launch her own protest campaign, so one has to weigh the constitutional right to free speech with that of being a disruptive influence on campus as well, which violates academic policies and by-laws, etc., no doubt (which she would have had to sign off on prior to admission to her institution). Her sustained protest as an expression of civil disobedience is essentially unjustifiable. Off campus, on permissible grounds perhaps with a protest permit, is another story.

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to LetstalkboutRAP3)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 6:35:36 AM   
LetstalkboutRAP3


Posts: 49
Joined: 9/30/2013
Status: offline
Hmm, a quick search reveals that polygraph tests are often admissible in court, with some caveats... Basically it's at the discretion of the judge, and whether or not the test subject(s) agreed to the admissibility of the test results (depends on the State). Here's some links.

http://www.truthorlie.com/admissible.html
http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/admissability-of-polygraph-tests-in-court.html
http://thepolygraphexaminer.com/polygraph_laws.htm

That last one has a pretty extensive case history.

Regardless, even if they were inadmissible in court, it could still serve as a useful investigatory tool. I don't know about you, but if I'm the investigating officer, and the accused is all "I didn't rape that bitch, I swear, I wanna take a lie detector, I got nuthin' to hide," and meanwhile the accuser is like, "I was just raped and you don't believe me, and asking me to take a lie dectector test is like being violated all over again." Well, one of those people seems like they don't have anything to hide, and the other one kinda does.

FMRI unlike the polygraph is basically unbeatable. If we chose to, we could develop FMRI testing protocols where the reliability rate would be on par with dna testing. Imagine a test that could put the bastard away in any of a number of these he said she said situations! We won't though. Two reasons. FMRI is expensive, and developing the necessary protocols would be even more expensive. Any such testing protocol would make evident the fact that far more than 8 percent of rape accusations are false accusations. That would make women look bad, and we can't have that.




(in reply to FieryOpal)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 7:43:09 AM   
FieryOpal


Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LetstalkboutRAP3

Basically it's at the discretion of the judge, and whether or not the test subject(s) agreed to the admissibility of the test results (depends on the State).


You're right, there are at least 5 states which do (California, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, and Florida), if the judge allows it with "the stipulations of both parties" and states having "different emphasis on the test's accuracy." Interesting that Florida requires that previously convicted sex offenders submit to polygraph tests, "but even then those test results cannot be used against them in court, and are for use only within the course of their therapy."
â—¾Georgia law, on the other hand, allows defendants who suffer damage because of a false result on a polygraph test (which are somewhat frequent) to sue the polygraph operator for damages and attorney[']s fees.

No test is foolproof and there's potential for human error in any test, whether it's an fMRI-functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (functional MRI), or not.

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to LetstalkboutRAP3)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 9:15:21 AM   
ExiledTyrant


Posts: 4547
Joined: 12/9/2013
From: Exiled
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant

You can perpetuate what ever delusion you need to to shelter yourself from the truth. It doesn't diminish the fact that the content of your posts reveal you to be a foul and bitter person, and your antagonistic nature over the topic will not retroactively negate the issues that brought you to that place in your life. You're the victim of your own choices and raising hell over your past mistakes because in your sociopathic delusion you perpetrated no wrong, will change nothing. Your perception is warped and is exactly that of a predator and perpetrator.

Jus sayin



So Im a predator for saying its not rape if you consented even if you didnt want to do it.

Got it, Cleared up so perfectly there. You are just a special little snowflake.. talking to you has changed my life so dramatically, I think every guy touching a girls ass in a crowded room now is rape like most would drive you to believe.

Im neither a sociopath nor deluded. Disagreeing with you or other people on what rape is or isnt doesnt make me so as much as you wish it were true... But please do continue to make an ass out of yourself, Its highly entertaining.


I'm not really sure why you're lurking around here. You should be in P&R with everyone else that wants to bitch and whine relentlessly but do nothing to make changes. Personally, when I encounter laws or practices I don't care for, I change those laws/practices. It's one of the perks of democracy.

It's a smart phone world and, at some point, everyone will wise up and use their smart phone features and this debate will fall into antiquity. Antagonizing victims only makes you come across preditorial or that you have been caught with your hand in the cookie jar in an act that you felt justified but was charged and tried unjustly. I get that it's a flawed system and it pisses you off, what pisses me off is when violent sex offenders do less time than the pot head.

If you truly want to create change on this topic then you need to assist your state representative in penning a bill that excludes the use of a smart phone as a wire tapping device when establishing consensual/non-consensual sex.

Jus sayin


_____________________________

Gnothi Seauton
To lead, first follow: Aurelius, Epictetus, Descartes, Sun Tzu, to name a few.

Semper fidelis (which sometimes feels like a burden)

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 9:22:53 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline
So this could potentially mean, all those poor kids that fail polygraph tests on the Jeremy Kyle Show could well be innocent.

_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to FieryOpal)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 9:25:22 AM   
MariaB


Posts: 2969
Joined: 4/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten

Ive watched lives be destroyed from false rape claims. Even after the guy PROVED IT WAS FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE because he was in a different STATE. He still gets labeled a rapist because some cunt regretted telling him he could do what he wanted and he took her anally.




How did he take her anally from another state?

_____________________________

My store is http://e-stimstore.com

(in reply to quizzicalkitten)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 9:54:27 AM   
quizzicalkitten


Posts: 312
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MariaB


quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten

Ive watched lives be destroyed from false rape claims. Even after the guy PROVED IT WAS FUCKING IMPOSSIBLE because he was in a different STATE. He still gets labeled a rapist because some cunt regretted telling him he could do what he wanted and he took her anally.




How did he take her anally from another state?


They fucked 6 months before hand and she consented. They realized a few weeks later they went compatible and parted ways. A few months later she says he raped her the night before

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 10:04:11 AM   
LetstalkboutRAP3


Posts: 49
Joined: 9/30/2013
Status: offline
I bet it's like in that Vonnegut novel, where his cock is really thousands of miles long, it's just that most of it exists in a higher dimension.

Edit:

@quizzical

Yea, that's low. Same thing, more or less, happened to a buddy of mine in the Navy. Broke things off, she cried rape.

< Message edited by LetstalkboutRAP3 -- 9/4/2014 10:12:25 AM >

(in reply to MariaB)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 - 9/4/2014 10:05:18 AM   
quizzicalkitten


Posts: 312
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant


quote:

ORIGINAL: quizzicalkitten


quote:

ORIGINAL: ExiledTyrant

You can perpetuate what ever delusion you need to to shelter yourself from the truth. It doesn't diminish the fact that the content of your posts reveal you to be a foul and bitter person, and your antagonistic nature over the topic will not retroactively negate the issues that brought you to that place in your life. You're the victim of your own choices and raising hell over your past mistakes because in your sociopathic delusion you perpetrated no wrong, will change nothing. Your perception is warped and is exactly that of a predator and perpetrator.

Jus sayin



So Im a predator for saying its not rape if you consented even if you didnt want to do it.

Got it, Cleared up so perfectly there. You are just a special little snowflake.. talking to you has changed my life so dramatically, I think every guy touching a girls ass in a crowded room now is rape like most would drive you to believe.

Im neither a sociopath nor deluded. Disagreeing with you or other people on what rape is or isnt doesnt make me so as much as you wish it were true... But please do continue to make an ass out of yourself, Its highly entertaining.


I'm not really sure why you're lurking around here. You should be in P&R with everyone else that wants to bitch and whine relentlessly but do nothing to make changes. Personally, when I encounter laws or practices I don't care for, I change those laws/practices. It's one of the perks of democracy.

It's a smart phone world and, at some point, everyone will wise up and use their smart phone features and this debate will fall into antiquity. Antagonizing victims only makes you come across preditorial or that you have been caught with your hand in the cookie jar in an act that you felt justified but was charged and tried unjustly. I get that it's a flawed system and it pisses you off, what pisses me off is when violent sex offenders do less time than the pot head.

If you truly want to create change on this topic then you need to assist your state representative in penning a bill that excludes the use of a smart phone as a wire tapping device when establishing consensual/non-consensual sex.

Jus sayin



Ever thr foolish knight to thr rescuse.

First you don't know me, you don't know what I do or don't do, you have no idea my active or non active involvement so how about you pull your head out of your ass and stop trying to say you do. Or continue so I can use you as an open example of what type of people deserve my derision.

I have opinions and my opinions while harsh are just that my fucking opinions.

I don't whine and do nothing but have no reason to justify myself to some pathetic fool on the Internet because he feels I was mean to someone. So keep on keeping on sad little knight.


As for the topic at hand there is no way to make reporting a rape less painless, admitting weakness admitting suffering admitting all of that while being vulnerable is hard. It's so hard many people can't ever bring fourth thr courage to do it.

And for wither rape should be involved in thr employment process I say no.

I think rape should be one of those crimes where all names are withheld and tried in closed court sessions. Because even if you are a quitted of rape your still a rapist. Even if your just the accused your still a rapist.

(in reply to ExiledTyrant)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: "Yes means yes" part 2 Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109