Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Wanna buy a slave?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Wanna buy a slave? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 [14] 15   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/14/2014 6:37:40 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD



The embargo could be fairly described as economic warfare.


There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.



Actually, there was an embargo.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/oil-embargo

quote:

During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations. Arab OPEC members also extended the embargo to other countries that supported Israel including the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa. The embargo both banned petroleum exports to the targeted nations and introduced cuts in oil production. Several years of negotiations between oil-producing nations and oil companies had already destabilized a decades-old pricing system, which exacerbated the embargo’s effects.

The 1973 Oil Embargo acutely strained a U.S. economy that had grown increasingly dependent on foreign oil. The efforts of President Richard M. Nixon’s administration to end the embargo signaled a complex shift in the global financial balance of power to oil-producing states and triggered a slew of U.S. attempts to address the foreign policy challenges emanating from long-term dependence on foreign oil.

By 1973, OPEC had demanded that foreign oil corporations increase prices and cede greater shares of revenue to their local subsidiaries. In April, the Nixon administration announced a new energy strategy to boost domestic production to reduce U.S. vulnerability to oil imports and ease the strain of nationwide fuel shortages. That vulnerability would become overtly clear in the fall of that year.

The onset of the embargo contributed to an upward spiral in oil prices with global implications. The price of oil per barrel first doubled, then quadrupled, imposing skyrocketing costs on consumers and structural challenges to the stability of whole national economies. Since the embargo coincided with a devaluation of the dollar, a global recession seemed imminent. U.S. allies in Europe and Japan had stockpiled oil supplies, and thereby secured for themselves a short-term cushion, but the long-term possibility of high oil prices and recession precipitated a rift within the Atlantic Alliance. European nations and Japan found themselves in the uncomfortable position of needing U.S. assistance to secure energy sources, even as they sought to disassociate themselves from U.S. Middle East policy. The United States, which faced a growing dependence on oil consumption and dwindling domestic reserves, found itself more reliant on imported oil than ever before, having to negotiate an end to the embargo under harsh domestic economic circumstances that served to diminish its international leverage. To complicate matters, the embargo’s organizers linked its end to successful U.S. efforts to bring about peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors.


Another article on the subject:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2013/10/15/234771573/the-1973-arab-oil-embargo-the-old-rules-no-longer-apply

< Message edited by Zonie63 -- 9/14/2014 6:39:17 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 261
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/14/2014 8:45:47 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

The point being that you deal with the threat, should we have waited till there were Nazi soldiers on American soil? The Germans and Italians hadn't done anything to us and we declared war on them anyway.

Well, we actually did wait--to the deep dismay of the British--until we were attacked at Pearl Harbor. I think the Germans declared war on us first, in response to our declaring war against Japan, but I'm too tired to hit the books tonight. Not sure about Italy.


The Germans did declare war on the US, but I don't think it had anything to do with Japan.

It was more that Hitler and associated odd-balls were a pack of lunatics, who, while deeply embroiled in attempting to conquer Russia; thought it would be a good idea to declare war on the United States at the same time.


Yes, declaring war on the US ranked up there with Hitler's refusal to fight a mobile war in Russia


< Message edited by BamaD -- 9/14/2014 8:46:59 AM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 262
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/14/2014 8:48:40 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD



The embargo could be fairly described as economic warfare.


There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.



Actually, there was an embargo.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/oil-embargo

quote:

During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations. Arab OPEC members also extended the embargo to other countries that supported Israel including the Netherlands, Portugal, and South Africa. The embargo both banned petroleum exports to the targeted nations and introduced cuts in oil production. Several years of negotiations between oil-producing nations and oil companies had already destabilized a decades-old pricing system, which exacerbated the embargo’s effects.

The 1973 Oil Embargo acutely strained a U.S. economy that had grown increasingly dependent on foreign oil. The efforts of President Richard M. Nixon’s administration to end the embargo signaled a complex shift in the global financial balance of power to oil-producing states and triggered a slew of U.S. attempts to address the foreign policy challenges emanating from long-term dependence on foreign oil.

By 1973, OPEC had demanded that foreign oil corporations increase prices and cede greater shares of revenue to their local subsidiaries. In April, the Nixon administration announced a new energy strategy to boost domestic production to reduce U.S. vulnerability to oil imports and ease the strain of nationwide fuel shortages. That vulnerability would become overtly clear in the fall of that year.

The onset of the embargo contributed to an upward spiral in oil prices with global implications. The price of oil per barrel first doubled, then quadrupled, imposing skyrocketing costs on consumers and structural challenges to the stability of whole national economies. Since the embargo coincided with a devaluation of the dollar, a global recession seemed imminent. U.S. allies in Europe and Japan had stockpiled oil supplies, and thereby secured for themselves a short-term cushion, but the long-term possibility of high oil prices and recession precipitated a rift within the Atlantic Alliance. European nations and Japan found themselves in the uncomfortable position of needing U.S. assistance to secure energy sources, even as they sought to disassociate themselves from U.S. Middle East policy. The United States, which faced a growing dependence on oil consumption and dwindling domestic reserves, found itself more reliant on imported oil than ever before, having to negotiate an end to the embargo under harsh domestic economic circumstances that served to diminish its international leverage. To complicate matters, the embargo’s organizers linked its end to successful U.S. efforts to bring about peace between Israel and its Arab neighbors.


Another article on the subject:

http://www.npr.org/blogs/parallels/2013/10/15/234771573/the-1973-arab-oil-embargo-the-old-rules-no-longer-apply

The embargo led to price increases. But there was an embargo.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 263
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 6:18:53 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

ORIGINAL: thompsonx



There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.



Actually, there was an embargo.

Your source seems to be as ignorant of the meaning of the word embargo as you are.
There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.
It would help if you knew what the fuck an embargo is.


https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=embargo

(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 264
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 6:21:08 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

The embargo led to price increases. But there was an embargo.

Your source seems to be as ignorant of the meaning of the word embargo as you are.
There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.
It would help if you knew what the fuck an embargo is.


https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=embargo

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 265
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 6:23:25 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

The Germans did declare war on the US, but I don't think it had anything to do with Japan.

If one reads the declaration and the speech that accompanied it there can be no doubt that italy and germany declared war on the u.s. because of the u.s. declaration of war on japan.

It was more that Hitler and associated odd-balls were a pack of lunatics, who, while deeply embroiled in attempting to conquer Russia; thought it would be a good idea to declare war on the United States at the same time.

Hitler did not think it was a good idea but the treaty with japan obligated him to do so.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 266
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 6:26:28 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

We as in "The United States of America." It doesn't matter if you personally use gasoline or not. It also affects any product you might use that is shipped using gasoline. The "current situation" is not just about the Middle East, but also about the current state of our economy and the well-being of the people. It's pretty clear that decisions made back in the 1970s fucked the government and fucked America as a whole.

The policies were made by the rich for the rich what remains today sitll does the same thing.

It's not much of an argument to say that the "rich got richer," since they're the same imbeciles who made the decisions that put America in this sorry position in the first place.


The sorry position that makes their bank accounts fatter?

They're far worse than whatever "armchair warriors" there are around here.

The chairborn rangers here are their sycophants.






(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 267
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 6:30:23 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

As a retired veteran I am insulted.


Why don't you take that pompous attitude and stick it up your ass. You were a phoquing office pogue who spent 20 years avoiding your social responsibilities of getting a real job.

As a pacifist it is something you have to face.


Pacifist always have to face the bullshit that warmogers like you produce.

Another stupid question which of course cannot be answered.
I don't expect them, I like to think that people will wake up before it comes to that.

See if you had real time knowledge of soldering you would have to ask how the phoque would they get here? How would they be supplied?

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 268
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 6:33:08 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: BamaD

If we wait for them to come here can we count on you to resist?

You have already told us that you are too old and crippled to resist/join the military. So now you want to start a war that you have abdicated any necessity of your shedding your blood in but now ask someone fresh off of his hospital bed to take your place. Punkass motherfucker behaviour at it's best.


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 269
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 8:06:20 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:


ORIGINAL: Zonie63

quote:


ORIGINAL: thompsonx



There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.




Actually, there was an embargo.


Your source seems to be as ignorant of the meaning of the word embargo as you are.
There was never an embargo there was an increase in price.
It would help if you knew what the fuck an embargo is.


https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=embargo



Okay, so your link gives us a definition of the word "embargo":

quote:

em·bar·go
emˈbärgō/
noun
noun: embargo; plural noun: embargoes
1.
an official ban on trade or other commercial activity with a particular country.
"an embargo on grain sales"
an official prohibition on any activity.
synonyms: ban, bar, prohibition, stoppage, interdict, proscription, veto, moratorium; More
historical
an order of a state forbidding foreign ships to enter, or any ships to leave, its ports.
archaic
a stoppage, prohibition, or impediment.
verb
verb: embargo; 3rd person present: embargoes; past tense: embargoed; past participle: embargoed; gerund or present participle: embargoing
1.
impose an official ban on (trade or a country or commodity).
"the country has been virtually embargoed by most of the noncommunist world"
officially ban the publication of.
3rd person present: embargos
"documents of national security importance are routinely embargoed"
synonyms: ban, bar, prohibit, stop, interdict, debar, proscribe, outlaw; More
antonyms: allow
2.
archaic
seize (a ship or goods) for state service.


The embargo started in October, 1973 and was lifted in March, 1974. That is, they imposed an official ban on a country (the United States) and on a commodity (oil), which falls perfectly in line with the definition of the word "embargo."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis#Arab_oil_embargo_in_response_to_war

quote:

October 17—OAPEC oil ministers agree to use oil as a weapon to influence the West's support of Israel in the Yom Kippur war. They recommend an embargo against non-complying states and mandate a cut in exports.
October 19—US President Richard Nixon requests Congress to appropriate $2.2 billion in emergency aid to Israel. This decision triggered a collective Arab response.[16] Libya immediately proclaims an embargo on oil exports to the United States;[17] Saudi Arabia and other Arab oil producing states follow suit the next day.[17]
October 26—The Yom Kippur War ends.
November 5—Arab producers announce a 25% output cut. A further 5% cut is threatened.
November 23—The Arab embargo is extended to Portugal, Rhodesia, and South Africa.
November 27—U.S. President Richard Nixon signs the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act authorizing price, production, allocation and marketing controls.
December 9—Arab oil ministers agree to another five percent cut for non-friendly countries for January 1974.
December 25—Arab oil ministers cancel the five percent output cut for January. Saudi oil minister Ahmed Zaki Yamani promises a ten percent OPEC production rise.
January 7–9, 1974—OPEC decides to freeze prices until April 1.
January 18—Israel signs a withdrawal agreement to pull back to the east side of the Suez Canal.
February 11 – United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger unveils the Project Independence plan to make U.S. energy independent.
February 12–14—Progress in Arab-Israeli disengagement brings discussion of oil strategy among the heads of state of Algeria, Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia.
March 5—Israel withdraws the last of its troops from the west side of the Suez Canal.
March 17—Arab oil ministers, with the exception of Libya, announce the end of the embargo against the United States.



(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 270
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 8:43:09 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:


ORIGINAL: Zonie63

We as in "The United States of America." It doesn't matter if you personally use gasoline or not. It also affects any product you might use that is shipped using gasoline. The "current situation" is not just about the Middle East, but also about the current state of our economy and the well-being of the people. It's pretty clear that decisions made back in the 1970s fucked the government and fucked America as a whole.


The policies were made by the rich for the rich what remains today sitll does the same thing.


Yes, but just because they're rich doesn't mean they're smart. There are a number of historical examples one could cite where rich people have had to flee their own countries with their tails between their legs because they ran their countries into the ground. It seems to be the same old story, where the insular myopia of the ruling class eventually leads to overthrow from within or defeat from without.

quote:

quote:


It's not much of an argument to say that the "rich got richer," since they're the same imbeciles who made the decisions that put America in this sorry position in the first place.



The sorry position that makes their bank accounts fatter?


Tsar Nicholas II had a net worth equivalent to $300 billion today. A fat bank account didn't do much good for him.


quote:

quote:


They're far worse than whatever "armchair warriors" there are around here.


The chairborn rangers here are their sycophants.


Perhaps they're sycophants...or possibly dupes; it's hard to say. It seems like trying to argue with Colonel Klink or Sergeant Schultz.


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 271
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 10:13:40 AM   
FieryOpal


Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

The Germans did declare war on the US, but I don't think it had anything to do with Japan.

If one reads the declaration and the speech that accompanied it there can be no doubt that italy and germany declared war on the u.s. because of the u.s. declaration of war on japan.
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

It was more that Hitler and associated odd-balls were a pack of lunatics, who, while deeply embroiled in attempting to conquer Russia; thought it would be a good idea to declare war on the United States at the same time.

Hitler did not think it was a good idea but the treaty with japan obligated him to do so.

A couple of serious questions (as usual ) -- Didn't Hitler count on the support of German-American sympathizers to keep the U.S. out of WWII, or to somehow subvert us from mobilizing war efforts against the Nazi Axis in the European/Eurasian theatre?

Knowing that invading Russia was a daunting undertaking, and wanting to avoid making the same mistakes Napoleon had made, do you believe Hitler was counting on his Japanese allies to eventually come to Germany's assistance if needed per Japan's occupation of conquered Asian & Pacific territories, specifically via China (and force Russia to fight on two fronts)?

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 272
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 10:26:25 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

Okay, so your link gives us a definition of the word "embargo":

The embargo started in October, 1973 and was lifted in March, 1974. That is, they imposed an official ban on a country (the United States) and on a commodity (oil), which falls perfectly in line with the definition of the word "embargo."

What do you think you might find if you were to check the oil consumption of oil in the u.s. for that five month period? If it went down by the amount that we imported that was "embargoed" that would indicate that there was in fact an embargo. If the oil consumption did not go down that might indicate that we were still getting oil at the same level we had before the so called "embargo"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis#Arab_oil_embargo_in_response_to_war

quote:

October 17—OAPEC oil ministers agree to use oil as a weapon to influence the West's support of Israel in the Yom Kippur war. They recommend an embargo against non-complying states and mandate a cut in exports.


Operant word here is recommend.

October 19—US President Richard Nixon requests Congress to appropriate $2.2 billion in emergency aid to Israel. This decision triggered a collective Arab response.[16] Libya immediately proclaims an embargo on oil exports to the United States;[17]


How difficult would it be for you to find out how much we imported from lybia before the so called "embargo"?


Saudi Arabia and other Arab oil producing states follow suit the next day.[17]
October 26—The Yom Kippur War ends.
November 5—Arab producers announce a 25% output cut. A further 5% cut is threatened.

How muh was actually cut?


November 23—The Arab embargo is extended to Portugal, Rhodesia, and South Africa.

They are really not part of the u.s.

November 27—U.S. President Richard Nixon signs the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act authorizing price, production, allocation and marketing controls.
December 9—Arab oil ministers agree to another five percent cut for non-friendly countries for January 1974.

How much was actually cut?

December 25—Arab oil ministers cancel the five percent output cut for January. Saudi oil minister Ahmed Zaki Yamani promises a ten percent OPEC production rise.

Wow 16 days of threatened cuts in production followed by a real increase.


January 7–9, 1974—OPEC decides to freeze prices until April 1.

This would have the effect of stabalizing prices would it not?




January 18—Israel signs a withdrawal agreement to pull back to the east side of the Suez Canal.
February 11 – United States Secretary of State Henry Kissinger unveils the Project Independence plan to make U.S. energy independent.
February 12–14—Progress in Arab-Israeli disengagement brings discussion of oil strategy among the heads of state of Algeria, Egypt, Syria and Saudi Arabia.
March 5—Israel withdraws the last of its troops from the west side of the Suez Canal.
March 17—Arab oil ministers, with the exception of Libya, announce the end of the embargo against the United States.


How much oil were we deprived of by this so called "embargo"?



(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 273
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 10:39:45 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Zonie63

Yes, but just because they're rich doesn't mean they're smart. There are a number of historical examples one could cite where rich people have had to flee their own countries with their tails between their legs because they ran their countries into the ground.

These examples are few and far between.


It seems to be the same old story, where the insular myopia of the ruling class eventually leads to overthrow from within or defeat from without.

The ruling class in japan is the same as before the war. The ruling class in germany is the same as before. The rich get richer and the poor get pregnant

Tsar Nicholas II had a net worth equivalent to $300 billion today. A fat bank account didn't do much good for him.

Yet many of the ruling class of imperial russia escaped with their fortunes in tact...nikki and his family were nothing but punks not even worth the skin.




(in reply to Zonie63)
Profile   Post #: 274
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 11:07:59 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

A couple of serious questions (as usual ) -- Didn't Hitler count on the support of German-American sympathizers to keep the U.S. out of WWII, or to somehow subvert us from mobilizing war efforts against the Nazi Axis in the European/Eurasian theatre?

Hitler was not a big fan of the u.s. in general but he found much support from many(not most) of industrialist in the u.s. Pretty much the same "law and order" crowd that froths at the mouth on a regular bassis about "respect for authority" today.
The "german american bund" was a big deal but there is scant evidence of the pro-german punks being herded onto reservations like the japs. Ironically it was the self same industrialist who inadvertantly helped the axis by not "sharing the wealth" that they were reaping with their fat war toy contracts. The employees of todd shipyard rebelled and set one of the ships on fire. The mafia told the feds they could stop all further sabtoge on the docks in new york if the feds would give the mafia back lucky luciano. They did and that was the end of sabatoge in nyc docks.


Knowing that invading Russia was a daunting undertaking,

Hitler believed his own propaganda about the "sub human russians". He actually believed he would be eating christmas dinner in the krimlin.


and wanting to avoid making the same mistakes Napoleon had made,

Going to an ass kicking contest barefoot?


do you believe Hitler was counting on his Japanese allies to eventually come to Germany's assistance if needed per Japan's occupation of conquered Asian & Pacific territories, specifically via China (and force Russia to fight on two fronts)?

Before the germans attacked, stalin had made a deal with the japs about non aggression. The japs never planned on fighting a long war with the u.s. They thought they could negotiate a peaceful settlement and started doing so with russia as their emissary right after the midway disaster.Japans desires were all in china. That was where the money was...and of course revenge.

(in reply to FieryOpal)
Profile   Post #: 275
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 12:56:07 PM   
FieryOpal


Posts: 2821
Joined: 12/8/2013
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
quote:

ORIGINAL: FieryOpal

and wanting to avoid making the same mistakes Napoleon had made,

Going to an ass kicking contest barefoot?

Yathink these UGG®s might have helped the French in their ass-kicking contest?
(Couldn't find thigh-high snow height boots.)

Metal buckles could have been used for secondary or tertiary weaponry as a last resort.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Being deeply loved by someone gives you strength, while loving someone deeply gives you courage. - Lao Tzu
There is no remedy for love but to love more. - Thoreau

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 276
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 1:22:14 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

The Germans did declare war on the US, but I don't think it had anything to do with Japan.

If one reads the declaration and the speech that accompanied it there can be no doubt that italy and germany declared war on the u.s. because of the u.s. declaration of war on japan.

It was more that Hitler and associated odd-balls were a pack of lunatics, who, while deeply embroiled in attempting to conquer Russia; thought it would be a good idea to declare war on the United States at the same time.

Hitler did not think it was a good idea but the treaty with japan obligated him to do so.



Not true at all.

The Japanese did not declare war on Russia, because they were somewhere approaching sanity. Whereas Hitler and his mates were clearly not a full shilling.


_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 277
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/15/2014 1:34:55 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

The Germans did declare war on the US, but I don't think it had anything to do with Japan.

If one reads the declaration and the speech that accompanied it there can be no doubt that italy and germany declared war on the u.s. because of the u.s. declaration of war on japan.

It was more that Hitler and associated odd-balls were a pack of lunatics, who, while deeply embroiled in attempting to conquer Russia; thought it would be a good idea to declare war on the United States at the same time.

Hitler did not think it was a good idea but the treaty with japan obligated him to do so.



Not true at all.

The Japanese did not declare war on Russia, because they were somewhere approaching sanity. Whereas Hitler and his mates were clearly not a full shilling.


They could never win at solitaire, they only had 40 cards in their deck.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 278
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/16/2014 5:25:58 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent


Not true at all.

It is true that the axis alliance required germany and italy to declare war on the u.s. because the u.s. had declared war on japan.

The Japanese did not declare war on Russia, because they were somewhere approaching sanity.


The japanese did not declare war on russia because they had signed a treaty of non aggression with russia. Thus allowing them to conduct their operations in china and south asia with no interference from russia in the north.

http://famousdaily.com/history/russia-japan-non-aggression-pact.html






(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 279
RE: Wanna buy a slave? - 9/16/2014 6:10:05 AM   
Zonie63


Posts: 2826
Joined: 4/25/2011
From: The Old Pueblo
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
How much oil were we deprived of by this so called "embargo"?


I don't really want to derail this thread any further by quibbling over the definition of "embargo," but if what happened between Oct. '73 and March '74 was not an "embargo," then what was it? I do remember the long gas lines, rationing, and countless gas stations with "no gas" signs in front. You say it was just a price increase, but it was obviously much more than that. The prices did increase significantly during the years which followed, but the gas lines and rationing ended.

Even if it was just a ploy by the oil companies and the government to screw the people, it was still rather short-sighted.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 280
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 13 [14] 15   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Wanna buy a slave? Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 [14] 15   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.164