Bhruic
Posts: 985
Joined: 4/11/2012 From: Toronto, Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP On the 'cater to' thread, Manko posited that every power relationship must have a reward and punishment dynamic. My own response to that is that's bizarre. We have neither. In fact, if we had to do that, it would mean we weren't a good match. I am not a trained seal, willing to do anything for a piece of fish. Try this on me and my response will be to not want the reward. As far as punishment goes, if that's how you motivate and change behavior, it tells me that you aren't smart enough or are too damned lazy to identify the underlying problem and solve it. And I'm not interested in someone like that. Wondering how many people here subscribe to the puppy training theory of relationships. As opposed to talking things out and fixing them. While it is obvious, from all the replies, that there can be power exchange relationships which do not employ punishment and reward as a component, I find it surprising how judgy many of the replies seem to be on this topic. Obviously, punishment and reward can, and often is, a significant component of power exchange relationships and scenes. Some people's kinks are entirely about punishment and reward... How fun would a Disciplinarian scene be without it? And punishment and reward can mean many things too. For some subs/slaves, pleasing their Dom/Master is - I would certainly hope - a rewarding activity. And while some subs/slaves may enjoy pain for it's own sake, I am sure that there are others that enjoy some accompanying psychodrama for the pain in the form of a prescribed punishment. Sometimes, reading this forum, I wish that statements like "every power exchange relationship MUST include reward and punishment" would be met with an open exploration and expression of opinions and perspectives, rather than the more customary polarized response :( That's just my take.
_____________________________
pronounced "VROOick"
|