TransFat
Posts: 20
Joined: 4/12/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: sexyred1 quote:
ORIGINAL: TransFat quote:
ORIGINAL: ChrchofDrk For some it is inherently sexual. For some it's not. In truth BDSM isn't inherently anything except perhaps different to the norm BDSM is inherently non-sexual. It's only sexualized when we make it so. Water is inherent in all life, just because some people like to drink water and some don't doesn't change that fact... So why does that notion of some people ONLY employing BDSM in a sexual nature change the fact that it's inherently non-sexual? It doesn't, and nor is it bad, or wrong to sexualize BDSM in the first place. Folks who think that BDSM is inherently sexual are only thinking of their own experiences; they're trying to shove their own shoes on everyone else's foot. You are making a generalization that BDSM is inherently non-sexual, thus you are only thinking of your own experiences; you are trying to shove your own shoes on everyone else's foot. See how that works? It's nothing to do with my own experiences. It's cold, hard, fact. BDSM isn't sexual unless you make it so. Full stop. You folks are arguing against fact, not expressing your opinion, I'm not "Generalizing" anything; you're intellectually smashing your collective heads against a brick wall over and over hoping to make a dent.
|