quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Oh, you dont like that things are unrehearsed? That she might have been speaking 'off the cuff'? Because if it was, you would simply suspect her of wrong doing even more. Then again, you suspect her of wrong doing....BECAUSE....of who she is.
Not one shred of....ACTUAL....evidence, that she did something wrong. Not by one conservative on this forum! And all of you want to hang her. This whole thing is politically motivated....NOT....legally motivated.

quote:

I think we should have those 47 Republican Senators arrested and charged with TREASON, and have all their stuff investigated. Unlike Hillary, their guilt is undeniable. The evidence is pretty open for the nation to see. And they broke the law to score political points. But that's a different topic right?

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri

quote:

ORIGINAL: joether
Oh, you dont like that things are unrehearsed? That she might have been speaking 'off the cuff'? Because if it was, you would simply suspect her of wrong doing even more. Then again, you suspect her of wrong doing....BECAUSE....of who she is.
Not one shred of....ACTUAL....evidence, that she did something wrong. Not by one conservative on this forum! And all of you want to hang her. This whole thing is politically motivated....NOT....legally motivated.

Not "all of [conservatives on this forum] want to hang her." I've stated several times I don't think she's done anything wrong, and, even if she has, it's not likely to be able to be proven.

quote:

I think we should have those 47 Republican Senators arrested and charged with TREASON, and have all their stuff investigated. Unlike Hillary, their guilt is undeniable. The evidence is pretty open for the nation to see. And they broke the law to score political points. But that's a different topic right?

As a matter of fact, it is a different topic.

quote:

ORIGINAL: KenDckey

LOL It's not whether or not she broke a law. It is whether or not she will be investigated and potentially prosecuted. I think that we know the answer to that one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/03/10/flashback-when-millions-of-lost-bush-white-hous/202820


Oh look, short memories. And no conspiracy at that time. The foolishness is strong with these ones, Obi Wan.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Eric Bolling, co-host of Fox News' The Five, accused Hillary Clinton of "blusters" and "lying" for saying in her press conference that she was unable to securely access multiple email accounts on one mobile phone, opting instead to use her own email server instead of using two phones. But at the time, it was reportedly not possible to have two accounts on a secure BlackBerry like the one Clinton carreid.
During her press conference, Clinton said of her decision to use a personal email account for her government work when she became secretary of state:
I opted for convenience to use my personal email account, which was allowed by the State Department, because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.
Looking back, it would've been better if I'd simply used a second email account and carried a second phone, but at the time, this didn't seem like an issue.
After playing video of Clinton's comment, Bolling asked, "Are you kidding me? Any tenth grader could set up multiple email accounts on a single handheld device. Does she think the American people are that stupid?"
But as the technology blog Mashable reports, maintaining separate personal and government accounts on the same device is less secure, presenting a "real concern of attack vectors on the personal side." Moreover, when Clinton became secretary of state in 2009, "there was no standard way to secure a BlackBerry like Clinton's with two email accounts, at least not without giving the IT person in charge complete dominion over all the data on the phone. To fulfill the criteria that Clinton demanded -- secure email that's not sitting on a cloud service, plus a single-BlackBerry solution -- she had just one option: Set up her own email server."
The Washington Post similarly reports that "senior administration officials having two phones is still common to this day" due to security concerns. Former Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau wrote on Twitter that it was impossible to have two White House accounts on one phone "until maybe 2011-12."
Bolling later claimed, "If you go to your iPhone, you can press a button that says 'add account' and you can have any one of six email servers ready to go, set up a new one."
But that feature, called "unified inbox" was not available on iPhones in 2009 when Clinton became secretary of state. That was added in iOS 4, released in June of 2010.
http://mashable.com/2015/03/10/hillary-clinton-email-blackberry/?utm_cid=mash-com-Tw-main-link
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/03/10/why-couldnt-hillary-clinton-have-two-email-accounts-on-one-phone/
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/03/10/fox-host-said-clinton-was-lying-but-she-couldnt/202833

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)