RE: Big Money in Elections (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


mnottertail -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 1:00:07 PM)

You don't understand a complex question, as you have demonstrated.

Answer is no. Game over, no innuendo, no impugnment.




Sanity -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 1:25:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

It's a yes or no question.


Setting and maintaining false narratives means everything to you and your party, doesnt it.

"Conservatives... Must... Be... Silenced..."

Inside the Leftist Mind: The Primacy of Narrative Over Facts

Fox News Derangement Syndrome




mnottertail -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 2:33:36 PM)

where do you come up with this factless hysterical shit your pants feebleminded asswipe? The shit is hallucinatory.




HunterCA -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 3:06:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

It's a yes or no question.


Setting and maintaining false narratives means everything to you and your party, doesnt it.

"Conservatives... Must... Be... Silenced..."

Inside the Leftist Mind: The Primacy of Narrative Over Facts

Fox News Derangement Syndrome


I probably can't find it now but I read a good article about this a couple of weeks ago. The post modern deconstruction of everything allows "Different" points of views and "Different" racial or gender interpretation of the world and it is told through stories. It's funny that the elites who pride themselves on "science" disregard facts for the tribal story.




cloudboy -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 7:35:29 PM)


Is Fox News a "standard bearer" news organization, i.e. representative of high journalistic standards?

Yes or No.

Answer the question?




bounty44 -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 7:52:19 PM)

do you still beat your wife?

yes or no?

answer the question?

(im really tempted, since you keep not getting the point, willfully or otherwise, to ask if you have suffered a recent blow to the head?)




Sanity -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 8:00:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy


Is Fox News a "standard bearer" news organization, i.e. representative of high journalistic standards?

Yes or No.

Answer the question?


Sorry, but I really cannot take you seriously.

Is FOX News a standard bearer... With the old standard being, a conservative rising star having had four traffic tickets in twenty years is worthy of a breathless expose?

The old standard being, worthless stinking used fishwrap?

Well yeah, it is - because the old standard is a joke. The old standard is not a hard standard to beat






cloudboy -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 10:03:44 PM)

So, you refuse to answer. Clearly, then, your answer is NO, Fox News is not a standard bearer for journalism, but for reasons particular to you, you can't say it.

The easy path for you was to say YES, but, even you, "the right wing asshole" (your tag line) can't say YES.

I don't like MSNBC -- mainly because like SALON, its not a news organization. There's no substance there.

News, investigative journalism, and expert analysis (from actual experts) are eye opening and help advance societies.




Kirata -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/9/2015 10:56:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

Is Fox News a "standard bearer" news organization, i.e. representative of high journalistic standards?

Well yeah, it is - because the old standard is a joke. The old standard is not a hard standard to beat

quote:

ORIGINAL: cloudboy

So, you refuse to answer.

How long have you had this problem?

K.




bounty44 -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/10/2015 2:23:20 AM)

good catch---

I mentioned a blow to the head possibility.

I think I share sanity's "but I really cannot take you seriously" position.

and apparently, "since he refuses to answer, clearly then the answer is yes, he still beats his wife."





DaddySatyr -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/10/2015 5:52:17 AM)

Never mind. Photos aren't working



Michael




bounty44 -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/10/2015 6:03:52 AM)

wanna send it to me in a message or email and i'll try it?




DaddySatyr -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/10/2015 6:15:28 AM)


I think it's the work they're doing on the site but I will send it.



Michael




bounty44 -> RE: Big Money in Elections (6/10/2015 6:30:40 AM)

giving the photo a shot...

[image]local://upfiles/1936645/8E0DDCD82044434EA90F10A2858F3CED.jpg[/image]

looks like it didn't work for me either, so you are probably right...




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 7 [8]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.078125