quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY

Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.

I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??

No, his line of crap is worse than Joether, the last time this came up he actually claimed that the 2nd was there to protect the the central government from the states, then he has the gall to claim I haven't read the Constitution.

Well, according to post #1290 he's pretty much in line with the joether school of make believe. I really couldn't say for sure which one is more full of crap but you could be right.

It seems that Joether at least admits that the 2nd allows the states to offset the Feds, he doesn't seem to be so irrational as to think we have a bill of powers to protect the Feds from the people and the states.

BTW I never thought I would be saying that we had a regular further out in la la land than Joether, but if anyone could do it, it would be Mnottertail.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and amongst the relatively amoral (immoral?) bit of humanity we call liberals:

quote:

Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running [if she is charged with a felony]...

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/05/31/terrific-democrat-voters-believe-hillary-should-keep-running-for-president-if-shes-charged-with-a-felony-n2171437

And amongst the nutsuckers, there was Nixon, St. Wrinklemeat (at least twice violating the law in the various weapons deals), W who was a convict prior to, during, and after his presidency, Trump who will surely be convicted, I am thinking that the morals of the nutsucker are describable as common mattress-backed crack whores.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY

Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.

I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??

No, his line of crap is worse than Joether, the last time this came up he actually claimed that the 2nd was there to protect the the central government from the states, then he has the gall to claim I haven't read the Constitution.

Well, according to post #1290 he's pretty much in line with the joether school of make believe. I really couldn't say for sure which one is more full of crap but you could be right.

It seems that Joether at least admits that the 2nd allows the states to offset the Feds, he doesn't seem to be so irrational as to think we have a bill of powers to protect the Feds from the people and the states.

BTW I never thought I would be saying that we had a regular further out in la la land than Joether, but if anyone could do it, it would be Mnottertail.

Nutsuckers are uncommonly stupid, they have know knowledge of the subjects they felch on, havent any idea of the constitution, the ideas in it, or any facts, they just lay around bellying up to the trough like the felching pigs they are, welfare patients and a pestilence to the United States. Nobody much gives a fuck about you all gargling felch in your little circle caucuses.

And I dont know which shiteater there was toiletlicking the states offsetting the feds comments, but I have never said that part is not true, in fact, in the militia debates, the founding fathers were of the opinion that the states should commission their own officers.

Seems like nutsuckers can only speak lies and hallucinations. Toiletlickers to a man. Not different views, actual factless shiteaters.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

Fr

For the benifit of those unfamiliar with the Constitution the 2nd amendment was not passed to allow the government to be able to wage war. That power is inherent in the fact of being a nation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

it just came to me that on the whole, people write about what they know...and given his propensity for the word, vile critter parts must really know nutsucking.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

it just came to me that on the whole, people write about what they know...and given his propensity for the word, vile critter parts must really know nutsucking.

That is a possiblity, he doesn't seem to know about anything else.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

it just came to me that on the whole, people write about what they know...and given his propensity for the word, vile critter parts must really know nutsucking.

That is a possiblity, he doesn't seem to know about anything else.

airport bathrooms? although I think that and "nutsucking" are related...so you could be right.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and amongst the relatively amoral (immoral?) bit of humanity we call liberals:

quote:

Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running [if she is charged with a felony]...

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/05/31/terrific-democrat-voters-believe-hillary-should-keep-running-for-president-if-shes-charged-with-a-felony-n2171437

And amongst the nutsuckers, there was Nixon, St. Wrinklemeat (at least twice violating the law in the various weapons deals), W who was a convict prior to, during, and after his presidency, Trump who will surely be convicted, I am thinking that the morals of the nutsucker are describable as common mattress-backed crack whores.

W was in prison during his term of office. You keep using that word (convict) , I don't think it means what you think it means.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

and amongst the relatively amoral (immoral?) bit of humanity we call liberals:

quote:

Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running [if she is charged with a felony]...

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/05/31/terrific-democrat-voters-believe-hillary-should-keep-running-for-president-if-shes-charged-with-a-felony-n2171437

And amongst the nutsuckers, there was Nixon, St. Wrinklemeat (at least twice violating the law in the various weapons deals), W who was a convict prior to, during, and after his presidency, Trump who will surely be convicted, I am thinking that the morals of the nutsucker are describable as common mattress-backed crack whores.

W was in prison during his term of office. You keep using that word (convict) , I don't think it means what you think it means.

Do you have a credible citation that W was in prison during his term of office? You are the only one who has said that, and do not lecture me on the English language, you have no commerce with it, nor knowledge of it.

You use words, but they dont mean what you think they mean. We are speaking Englische, as she is goodley spokene. We are not speaking nutsucker. Grab up a dictionary, I know you cant read the constitution, but you should be able to figure out a dictionary.

You dont think many things mean what they mean, convict is just one of them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

it just came to me that on the whole, people write about what they know...and given his propensity for the word, vile critter parts must really know nutsucking.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

it just came to me that on the whole, people write about what they know...and given his propensity for the word, vile critter parts must really know nutsucking.

I watch you people do it continuously and with such shameless gusto,

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

you've never heard of "screwed the pooch" or "fucked the dog"?
REALLY

Of course I have, Ronnie does it every time he posts. I see you want to distract from the fact that he is a liar and an asshole. I only asked that because earlier when I told him that concerning what I did at NSA "I can tell you but I would have to kill you" he treated it like an actual death threat.

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, (see if you can parse that part too) I guess welfare patients were not taught to read, especially the constitution.

You want to follow the constitution, but you havent read it, you want to tell me about the minds of the founding fathers, but havent read it.

I guess mental patients were not taught to read either, especially the Constitution. Why don't you parse that part for everyone. Would that be along the same line of crap as the joether school of the Second Amendment.??

No, his line of crap is worse than Joether, the last time this came up he actually claimed that the 2nd was there to protect the the central government from the states, then he has the gall to claim I haven't read the Constitution.

Well, according to post #1290 he's pretty much in line with the joether school of make believe. I really couldn't say for sure which one is more full of crap but you could be right.

It seems that Joether at least admits that the 2nd allows the states to offset the Feds, he doesn't seem to be so irrational as to think we have a bill of powers to protect the Feds from the people and the states.

BTW I never thought I would be saying that we had a regular further out in la la land than Joether, but if anyone could do it, it would be Mnottertail.

Nutsuckers are uncommonly stupid, they have know knowledge of the subjects they felch on, havent any idea of the constitution, the ideas in it, or any facts, they just lay around bellying up to the trough like the felching pigs they are, welfare patients and a pestilence to the United States. Nobody much gives a fuck about you all gargling felch in your little circle caucuses.

And I dont know which shiteater there was toiletlicking the states offsetting the feds comments, but I have never said that part is not true, in fact, in the militia debates, the founding fathers were of the opinion that the states should commission their own officers.

Seems like nutsuckers can only speak lies and hallucinations. Toiletlickers to a man. Not different views, actual factless shiteaters.

The shiteatting nutsucker who stated that the 2nd was to protect the Feds from the states was you, you need to keep track of the obsudities you spew.

No, you are the shiteating nutsucker in this vignette, welfare patient. I said the rationale behind the 2nd amendment was to guard against insurrections by the states, or states against states, ALL UNDER FEDERAL HEGEMONY. You are the shiteating sister fucking welfare patient that lied and said the second amendment was to protect the fed from the people. Militia, look it up, read the constitution, the notes on the constitutional convention, and go felch your fucking retarded buffoon ass elsewhere.

I said nothing of the sort, and only a lying fuckwhistle like yourself has said that, welfare patient.

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovmuffin

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

it just came to me that on the whole, people write about what they know...and given his propensity for the word, vile critter parts must really know nutsucking.

I watch you people do it continuously and with such shameless gusto,

Oh good, now he claims to follow you around with a video camera. Freakin creepy !!